Software Alternatives & Startups

TestComplete VS mxGraph

Compare TestComplete VS mxGraph and see what are their differences

TestComplete

TestComplete Desktop, Web, and Mobile helps you create repeatable and accurate automated tests across multiple devices, platforms, and environments easily and quickly.

Rating
0 reviews
mxGraph

mxGraph is a fully client side JavaScript diagramming library - jgraph/mxgraph

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

mxGraph might be a bit more popular than TestComplete. We know about 2 links to it since March 2021 and only 2 links to TestComplete.

social mentions
2 vs 2
Automated Testing popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 40

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

TestComplete
mxGraph
Website smartbear.com github.com
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

TestComplete 7 features
mxGraph 5 features
  • Ease of Use
    TestComplete has a user-friendly interface that allows both technical and non-technical users to create automated tests with ease.
  • Scriptless Testing
    The tool supports keyword-driven testing, enabling users to create automated tests without any scripting knowledge.
  • Multi-Technology Support
    TestComplete supports testing for a wide range of technologies, including desktop, web, and mobile applications, making it a versatile tool.
  • Integration Capabilities
    It easily integrates with other SmartBear tools and third-party tools like JIRA, Jenkins, and Azure DevOps, facilitating a smooth CI/CD process.
  • Parallel Test Execution
    TestComplete allows for parallel test executions, which can significantly reduce the total testing time and speed up the development cycle.
  • Object Recognition
    The tool includes advanced object recognition methods that ensure automated tests are stable and resilient to changes in the application's UI.
  • Comprehensive Reporting
    TestComplete provides detailed test reports and logs, helping teams quickly diagnose and address any issues that arise during testing.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    TestComplete is relatively expensive compared to other automated testing tools, which can be a significant investment for small and medium-sized businesses.
  • Resource Intensive
    The tool can be resource-intensive, requiring significant system resources for smooth operation, which might affect performance on less powerful machines.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, there can be a steep learning curve for users who want to utilize its more advanced features.
  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to some other popular testing tools, TestComplete has a smaller user community, which can make it challenging to find solutions to uncommon issues.
  • Complex Licensing Model
    The licensing model can be complex, potentially confusing for new users who need to understand different types of licenses and their limitations.
  • Open Source
    mxGraph is an open-source project, which allows developers to use, modify, and distribute the library freely.
  • Cross-Platform
    The library is designed to work seamlessly across multiple platforms (e.g., web browsers, desktop), providing flexibility in application deployment.
  • Rich Feature Set
    mxGraph provides a comprehensive set of features for building interactive diagramming applications, including support for drag-and-drop, undo/redo, zoom, and layout algorithms.
  • Lightweight
    Despite its rich feature set, mxGraph is relatively lightweight, which can yield better performance in terms of speed and resource usage.
  • Good Documentation
    mxGraph offers extensive documentation, making it easier for developers to understand and implement features in their projects.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its extensive feature set and flexibility, mxGraph might have a steep learning curve for developers who are new to the library.
  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to more mainstream libraries, mxGraph may have a smaller community, potentially limiting the availability of community-based support and resources.
  • Legacy Codebase
    Some parts of mxGraph's codebase may be considered outdated, particularly as newer technologies and frameworks have emerged since its initial development.
  • Complex Customization
    While mxGraph offers powerful customization capabilities, achieving specific custom behaviors and styles can be complex without in-depth knowledge of the library.
  • Sparse Ecosystem
    As a specialized library, it may have fewer third-party plugins and extensions compared to more widely-adopted graph libraries.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

TestComplete
mxGraph

Overall verdict

  • Overall, TestComplete is considered a robust and comprehensive tool for automated testing. Its user-friendly interface and powerful testing capabilities make it a worthwhile investment for many organizations aiming to improve their software testing processes.

Why this product is good

  • TestComplete is a popular automation tool for UI testing, known for its ease of use, broad range of supported applications, and testing capabilities. It supports multiple scripting languages, such as JavaScript, Python, and VBScript, allowing testers with varying coding skills to utilize it effectively. Its record-and-playback feature makes creating tests straightforward, and its extensive integration options with other tools enhance its functionality and flexibility. Additionally, TestComplete automates functional, regression, and performance testing, which contributes to higher-quality software releases.

Recommended for

    TestComplete is recommended for organizations seeking a reliable UI testing tool that supports both desktop, mobile, and web applications. It is especially beneficial for testers who appreciate the flexibility of choosing from multiple scripting languages or those who prefer a record-and-playback approach. It suits both small teams looking for straightforward solutions and larger enterprises that require more advanced integration and automation capabilities.

No analysis of mxGraph yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

TestComplete 1 video + Add
mxGraph 1 video + Add

TestComplete: The Easiest-to-Use Automated UI Testing Tool

mxGraph Made Easy 3

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
TestComplete
mxGraph
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using TestComplete and mxGraph. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

TestComplete no reviews yet
mxGraph no reviews yet

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

TestComplete 2 mentions
mxGraph 2 mentions
  • How to create step recording program like testcomplete?
    I've been working with Selenium and Python for the past two years and I can say I've good enough experience with them about now. One thing that has always bothered me is how much manual work I have to do in order to implement the steps I... Source: over 3 years ago
  • Looking for OS automation software
    SmartBear TestComplete and Ranorex both offer 30-day free trials to try them out. Their suites make it easy to automate desktop apps, but licensing is expensive. Part of what you pay for is being able to write "codeless" tests by... Source: over 4 years ago
  • Process Analytics - March 2022 News
    It is possible to use the new API to retrieve the bpmn-visualization and mxGraph versions used at runtime: getVersion(). - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • mxGraph usage in TypeScript projects
    This article is the first one of a series about mxGraph, the Javascript diagramming library. - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago

Alternatives to TestComplete and mxGraph

When comparing TestComplete and mxGraph, you can also consider the following products.

  • Sauce Labs

    Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

    Compare Sauce Labs to TestComplete or mxGraph:

  • GoJS

    GoJS is a JavaScript library for building interactive diagrams on HTML web pages. Build apps with flowcharts, org charts, BPMN, UML, modeling, and other visual graph types.

    Compare GoJS to TestComplete or mxGraph:

  • Ranorex Studio

    Accelerate testing with Ranorex Studio, the all-in-one tool for test automation. For desktop, web, or mobile app testing, with easy codeless automation tools, a full IDE, robust object recognition, flexible reporting and built-in Selenium WebDriver.

    Compare Ranorex Studio to TestComplete or mxGraph:

  • Paper.js

    Open source vector graphics scripting framework that runs on top of the HTML5 Canvas.

    Compare Paper.js to TestComplete or mxGraph:

  • soapUI

    SoapUI Pro is one of the most prominent API testing platforms around, allowing developers to quickly prototype the functions of their apps and get them to market with little hassle.

    Compare soapUI to TestComplete or mxGraph:

  • jsPlumb

    jsPlumb is an advanced, standards-compliant and easy to use JS library for building connectivity based applications, such as flowcharts, process flow diagrams, sequence diagrams, organisation charts, etc. More than just a diagram library.

    Compare jsPlumb to TestComplete or mxGraph: