
Teletype for Atom
CodeShare.io
Visual Studio Live Share
CodeTogether
Dabblet
Liveweave
Codeply
CSSDeck
Gitless
Pro Git
Pijul
lazygit
Git
Mercurial SCM
Learn Git Branching
Fork
Teletype for Atom
GitlessBased on our record, Gitless should be more popular than Teletype for Atom. It has been mentiond 14 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Focusing on the reason stated โpair programmingโ ask your employer if you can use live share for VSCode or teletype for atom instead. Pair programming works great in certain situations but screen sharing is the absolute worst way to get this done. Source: about 4 years ago
Teletype: this is one of the highlight features of Atom as it allows you to share your entire workspace and edit code together in real-time. Source: over 4 years ago
Some code editors have plugins to allow the developers to create collaboration sessions. Visual Studio has Live Share and Atom has Teletype. But the invitees need to install the editor to be able to join the session. Until today. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
Teletype for Atom might be what you're looking for. Also, haven't used yet, but a quick Google search shows me something like this also exists. Source: about 5 years ago
Hi there! I'd like to implement something similar to Teletype's way of connection. It briefly works this way: first the clients (peers) connect to an external server, then they somehow manage to establish a peer-to-peer connection to stop using the server and talk to each other. No need to open router ports in any of the peers. Source: over 5 years ago
This is unrelated to the tool called "Gitless": https://gitless.com/. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
One such project is the Gitless initiative which has a Python wrapper around Git proper providing far-simpler workflows based on some solid research. Unfortunately it doesn't look like Gitless' Python codebase has had active development recently, which doesn't inspire much confidence. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
You and me both. Git's interface has been very hard for me to understand (especially coming from Mercurial). I ended up finding Gitless (https://gitless.com), a wrapper around Git with a better interface, and loving it. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
> > To differentiate from Git Pijul should focus on usability... If Pijul has an easy to use interface like Mercurial did then that will massively help adoption. > I don't think the goal or differentiation of pijul is to be popular via good UI, though. If the theory of patches is good, it doesn't matter if pijul "wins" or not, as long as whatever does can integrate it. If the theory of patches is bad, I... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
I'd like to think it was my project (https://github.com/martinvonz/jj), but other possibilities include Gitless (https://gitless.com/) or Bazaar (https://bazaar.canonical.com/). - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
CodeShare.io - Realtime code sharing for developers
Pro Git - The Git Book is the official tutorial about Git.
Visual Studio Live Share - Real-time collaborative development
Pijul - Pijul is a free and open source distributed version control system based on a sound theory of...
CodeTogether - Live share IDEs and coding sessions. See changes in real time.
lazygit - Simple terminal UI for git commands.