
WebLOAD
OctoPerf
StresStimulus
LoadComplete
Loader.io
Loadster
k6 Cloud
Automation-friendly framework for Continuous Testing.

Create blank files, custom file types, templates, whole batches, and reusable folder setups exactly where you are working on macOS.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Taurus seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 5 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | gettaurus.org | createfilesplus.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Taurus yet.
CreateFiles+ adds the file creation workflow macOS should have had all along. Create a new file exactly where you are working, without opening TextEdit, saving-as, using Terminal, or dragging template files around. Use Finder right-click menus where macOS allows them, or fall back to the Finder...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Taurus yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Taurus G3
More videos
CreateFiles+ Demo
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Taurus and CreateFiles+.
CreateFiles+'s answer:
Xcode and Swift
CreateFiles+'s answer:
macOS should have created this feature out of the box but does not exist. Windows users have had this feature for over a decade. I created this to remove that gap for macOS users.
CreateFiles+'s answer:
I am not familiar with any competitors doing this today.
CreateFiles+'s answer:
Power Users, Developers, Productivity focused users, students, teachers, creators.
CreateFiles+'s answer:
Its brand new so that is yet to be determined.
CreateFiles+'s answer:
I have struggled with not having this capability in Finder for years and decided I would fix the problem for me and then see if other users would want the same solution.
Share your experience with using Taurus and CreateFiles+. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


My main goal was simplicity. Inspired by Taurus (https://gettaurus.org), I wanted QA engineers to create comprehensive tests without writing code—just YAML. But I also needed power: parameterization, data extraction, and seamless CI/CD... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
Taurus. You can use it on its own, or with JMeter. Which is nice, if you already know JMeter. Source: almost 4 years ago
You’ll need to run some benchmarks to know. Check out https://gettaurus.org. Source: over 4 years ago
Tracking CreateFiles+ since Jun 2026.
When comparing Taurus and CreateFiles+, you can also consider the following products.

WebLOAD - The most flexible and cost effective software for enterprise load, stress and performance testing, integrated with DevOps processes. Click for details
Compare WebLOAD to Taurus or CreateFiles+:

OctoPerf is an enterprise-grade load testing platform, available as SaaS & on-premise, helping IT teams validate scalability at lower cost.
Compare OctoPerf to Taurus or CreateFiles+:

Load testing tool for websites and mobile that works with hard-to-test applications.
Compare StresStimulus to Taurus or CreateFiles+:

The only load testing tool to record, replay, and test in real browsers at scale.
Compare LoadComplete to Taurus or CreateFiles+:

Loader.io is a simple cloud-based load testing service
Compare Loader.io to Taurus or CreateFiles+:

Loadster is load testing, stress testing, and site monitoring platform. Your site has a breaking point... load test to find it before your users do, and monitor to react quickly to downtime and other problems.
Compare Loadster to Taurus or CreateFiles+: