
WebLOAD
OctoPerf
StresStimulus
LoadView
k6 Cloud
Katalon
Taurus
The only load testing tool to record, replay, and test in real browsers at scale.

Create blank files, custom file types, templates, whole batches, and reusable folder setups exactly where you are working on macOS.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, LoadComplete seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | loadninja.com | createfilesplus.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of LoadComplete yet.
CreateFiles+ adds the file creation workflow macOS should have had all along. Create a new file exactly where you are working, without opening TextEdit, saving-as, using Terminal, or dragging template files around. Use Finder right-click menus where macOS allows them, or fall back to the Finder...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
LoadComplete 101: Getting Started in LoadComplete | SmartBear Academy
More videos
CreateFiles+ Demo
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing LoadComplete and CreateFiles+.
CreateFiles+'s answer:
Xcode and Swift
CreateFiles+'s answer:
macOS should have created this feature out of the box but does not exist. Windows users have had this feature for over a decade. I created this to remove that gap for macOS users.
CreateFiles+'s answer:
I am not familiar with any competitors doing this today.
CreateFiles+'s answer:
Power Users, Developers, Productivity focused users, students, teachers, creators.
CreateFiles+'s answer:
Its brand new so that is yet to be determined.
CreateFiles+'s answer:
I have struggled with not having this capability in Finder for years and decided I would fix the problem for me and then see if other users would want the same solution.
Share your experience with using LoadComplete and CreateFiles+. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Browser Testing: Hit pages with virtual users performing a flow e.g. Sign up, login. If you want a report of how many "real" users can use your app concurrently, then this testing would give the closest "real" world statistics. Cons -... Source: over 5 years ago
Tracking CreateFiles+ since Jun 2026.
When comparing LoadComplete and CreateFiles+, you can also consider the following products.

WebLOAD - The most flexible and cost effective software for enterprise load, stress and performance testing, integrated with DevOps processes. Click for details
Compare WebLOAD to LoadComplete or CreateFiles+:

OctoPerf is an enterprise-grade load testing platform, available as SaaS & on-premise, helping IT teams validate scalability at lower cost.
Compare OctoPerf to LoadComplete or CreateFiles+:

Load testing tool for websites and mobile that works with hard-to-test applications.
Compare StresStimulus to LoadComplete or CreateFiles+:

LoadView is a cloud-based load testing platform that allows users to stress-test their websites and web apps to know their performance level.
Compare LoadView to LoadComplete or CreateFiles+:

Managed load testing service built on top of the popular open-source project k6.
Compare k6 Cloud to LoadComplete or CreateFiles+:

Built on the top of Selenium and Appium, Katalon Studio is a free and powerful automated testing tool for web testing, mobile testing, and API testing.
Compare Katalon to LoadComplete or CreateFiles+: