Tailchat VS Devzat

• Open source and self-hostable
  Tailchat is open source (Apache/MIT-style licensing), so teams can deploy it on their own servers with Docker. This gives full control over data, privacy, and customization, which is attractive to organizations with compliance or data sovereignty requirements.
• Plugin-based extensibility
  The platform is built around a plugin system and a microservices architecture (Moleculer), allowing developers to add features, integrate third-party services, or build custom functionality such as bots, panels, and group extensions without modifying the core.
• Discord-like group and channel model
  It offers groups, text and other panel types, and a familiar layout for community and team collaboration. Users coming from Discord or Slack can adapt quickly, and it supports rich messaging, notifications, and customizable group panels.
• Cross-platform availability
  Tailchat provides web, desktop (Electron), and mobile clients (iOS/Android via React Native), so users can access it from multiple devices and teams are not restricted to a single platform.
• Open API and integrations
  It provides open APIs, webhooks, and bot/openapp support that let developers integrate external systems, automate workflows, and embed third-party apps inside the chat environment.

Possible disadvantages

• Smaller community and ecosystem
  Compared with Slack, Discord, Mattermost, or Rocket.Chat, Tailchat has a much smaller user base and fewer community-built plugins, tutorials, and third-party resources, making it harder to find help or ready-made extensions.
• Self-hosting complexity
  Running Tailchat requires managing multiple services (Node.js microservices, MongoDB, Redis, MinIO, etc.). Setup, scaling, upgrades, and maintenance demand DevOps knowledge, which can be a burden for small teams.
• Limited documentation and localization
  Documentation is less comprehensive than that of mature competitors, with gaps in advanced topics like plugin development and production deployment. Much of the community discussion is oriented toward Chinese-speaking users, which can be a barrier for others.
• Less enterprise-grade features
  Features such as advanced admin controls, compliance tooling, SSO options, audit logs, and guaranteed support are less mature than in established enterprise chat platforms, which may limit adoption in larger organizations.
• Uncertain long-term sustainability
  The project is driven by a small core team and relies on community contributions, so development pace, long-term maintenance, security response, and roadmap stability are less assured than with commercially backed products.

• Real-time Communication
  Devzat allows developers to chat in real-time, fostering immediate collaboration and exchange of ideas, which is crucial for effective team dynamics.
• Command Line Interface
  Devzat integrates into the developer's workflow seamlessly by using the command line, which many developers are accustomed to, ensuring familiarity and ease of use.
• Lightweight
  The application is lightweight, ensuring that it doesn't consume significant system resources, making it usable on a variety of systems without slowing them down.
• Open Source
  Being open source, Devzat allows users to modify and adapt the application to their specific needs, encouraging community contributions and transparency.
• Customizability
  Users can customize aspects of the chat, such as themes and commands, which enhances the user experience by allowing personalization.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Features
  Compared to other team communication tools, Devzat may lack advanced features such as video calls or robust file sharing capabilities, limiting its use in more complex communication scenarios.
• User Experience
  As a command line tool, it may not offer the most intuitive or visually appealing interface for users who are more accustomed to graphical interfaces.
• Dependency on Terminal
  Devzat’s reliance on terminal or command line usage means non-technical team members might find it challenging to use, potentially limiting collaboration across diverse teams.
• Scalability
  The tool might face challenges in handling a very large number of users simultaneously, which could be problematic for larger teams.
• Security Concerns
  Being an open-source project, there might be concerns about potential vulnerabilities or the need for users to manually ensure that the latest security patches are applied.

No Tailchat videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

HackTheBox - Devzat

More videos

Tracking Tailchat since Oct 2026.

• Ask HN: Why are so many OSS communities on Discord?

  I've tried to make this argument in the past and gained no traction. What I did instead was to create self hosted chat things as a fallback for the times when Discord or Slack have a green status page but their applications fail... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago

• Ask HN: Most Secure Way to Communicate?

  Did not know it was possible to use such ports as not-root. Anyway here is a direct link to how you can host your own devzat server: - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

• Ask HN: Most Secure Way to Communicate?

  One method could be a Linux laptop and using SSH to talk over devzat [1] They should generate a site-specific ssh key to talk to your devzat instance. The developer is here on HN. Configure devzat to listen on port 443. To do this as... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

View more