Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Surf VS QuickTile

Compare Surf VS QuickTile and see what are their differences

S
Surf

A simple web browser based on WebKit2/GTK+

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
QT
QuickTile

A lightweight utility for allowing you to quickly snap windows to a tiling grid under your existing...

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
Data Analytic System
Sourced crypto market data with indicator monitoring, market regime context and research. BTC, ETH, XRP, SOL + major indices monitored 24/7. Educational content — not investment advice. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Surf seems to be a lot more popular than QuickTile. While we know about 46 links to Surf, we've tracked only 4 mentions of QuickTile.

social mentions
46 vs 4
Web Browsers popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 45

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

S
Surf
QT
QuickTile
Website surf.suckless.org ssokolow.com
Pricing —
Open source
Listed in
Cryptocurrencies Crypto Web Browsers Web3 +1
Window Manager OSX Tools OSX Window Manager Multi Monitor +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

S
Surf 5 features
QT
QuickTile 4 features
  • Minimalism
    Surf is extremely lightweight and focuses on offering a minimalistic web browsing experience, which can result in faster performance and lower resource usage.
  • Customizability
    Users can tailor Surf to their specific needs through patches and configuration. This makes it highly adaptable for those who are comfortable with a bit of coding.
  • Integration with Suckless Tools
    Surf fits seamlessly into the Suckless ecosystem, integrating well with other minimal and efficient tools like the DWM window manager.
  • Privacy
    By default, Surf doesn't include many of the tracking features found in mainstream browsers, potentially offering a more privacy-conscious browsing experience.
  • Compliance with UNIX Philosophy
    Surf adheres to the UNIX philosophy of doing one thing well, focusing solely on web browsing without additional, potentially unwanted, features.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Customizing and configuring Surf can be challenging for users who are not familiar with programming or the command line.
  • Limited Features
    Due to its minimalistic design, Surf lacks many modern features like extensions, tabs, and a built-in password manager that are standard in other browsers.
  • Manual Updates
    Users need to manually update the browser, which can be a hassle compared to automatic updates provided by mainstream browsers.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Surf may have trouble rendering some modern web pages correctly, as it lacks some of the compatibility layers found in more feature-complete browsers.
  • Community Support
    Being a niche and minimalist browser, Surf does not have as large a user base or as much community support compared to more popular browsers.
  • Ease of Use
    QuickTile provides a straightforward approach to window tiling, allowing users to manage window layouts efficiently without complex configurations.
  • Customization
    It supports extensive customization, enabling users to define their own tiling layouts and shortcuts to suit their workflow needs.
  • Lightweight
    QuickTile is lightweight and doesn't consume significant system resources, making it suitable for older or less powerful machines.
  • Cross-Platform
    QuickTile is compatible with various Linux distributions, making it accessible to a wide range of Linux users.

Possible disadvantages

  • Linux Only
    QuickTile is designed for Linux systems, which means users on other operating systems like Windows or macOS cannot use it.
  • Limited Features
    Compared to full-fledged tiling window managers, QuickTile offers a more limited set of features focused solely on tiling.
  • Manual Configuration
    Some users may find the initial setup and configuration to be manual and time-consuming, especially if they want to tailor their shortcuts extensively.
  • No GUI
    QuickTile operates without a graphical user interface, which might not appeal to users who prefer visual configuration tools.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

S
Surf
QT
QuickTile

Overall verdict

  • Surf can be considered 'good' for users who value simplicity, minimal system resource usage, and the ability to customize their browsing experience via external scripts or patches. However, it might not be suitable for those who rely heavily on modern web features and extensions available in mainstream browsers.

Why this product is good

  • Surf is a minimalist web browser created by the Suckless community, known for developing software that adheres to the philosophy of simplicity and clarity. It is designed to be lightweight and efficient, making it suitable for users who prefer minimalism and are comfortable using a browser without a graphical user interface (GUI) for settings or extensions.

Recommended for

  • Users who are familiar with Unix-like operating systems and command-line interfaces.
  • Individuals who prefer lightweight and efficient software.
  • Those willing to customize their browser through external tools and scripts.
  • Minimalists who do not require a plethora of features and extensions.

No analysis of QuickTile yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

S
Surf 3 videos + Add
QT
QuickTile 0 videos + Add

Pro Surfer Reviews Surf Movies, from 'Blue Crush' to 'Point Break' | Vanity Fair

More videos

  • - Noel's "2021 Favorite Finds" Surfboards & Surf Product Must Haves
  • - Surf Tip "How to Surf Faster in Small Waves" Part 1

No QuickTile videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
S
Surf
QT
QuickTile
100% 100%
Web Browsers
0% 0%
0% 0%
Window Manager
100% 100%
100% 100%
Crypto
0% 0%
0% 0%
OSX Tools
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Surf and QuickTile. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

S
Surf 46 mentions
QT
QuickTile 4 mentions
  • My server is a phone now
    When I read about the browser 'surf', I first thought of the browser from suckless: https://surf.suckless.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • How to build a circular LCD clock
    Interesting, surf is based off WebKit2. https://surf.suckless.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Ladybird browser spreads its wings
    What about surf? https://surf.suckless.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

View more

  • My (challenging) experience building a window switcher for Ubuntu
    As the author of QuickTile, which is written in Python but even closer to what you describe than a window manager would be, I have to say that, yeah, doing X11 stuff takes a lot of knowledge that's not ideally documented in non-print... Source: over 3 years ago
  • Rust's problematic reliance on GitHub
    Actually, I plan to add a .nojekyll file and then use something like Pelican with custom plugins, then set GitHub Actions to run my update.sh on push... Similar to how http://ssokolow.com/quicktile/ is a Sphinx-based site hosted on... Source: over 4 years ago
  • tilling wm on elementary os ?
    I've been using ssokolow.com/quicktile for this purpose, it does what I need and doesn't replace the wm. Source: over 4 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Surf and QuickTile

When comparing Surf and QuickTile, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...