Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Surf VS Ember-cli

Compare Surf VS Ember-cli and see what are their differences

S
Surf

A simple web browser based on WebKit2/GTK+

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
E
Ember-cli

Application and Data, Libraries, and JavaScript Framework Components

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
AeroDataBox
Aviation and flight API tailored for SMBs and individual developers, offering flight status, schedules, aircraft and airport data, statistics, historical data and more. Seamless REST/web hook integration via API marketplaces at affordable rates. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Surf seems to be a lot more popular than Ember-cli. While we know about 46 links to Surf, we've tracked only 1 mention of Ember-cli.

social mentions
46 vs 1
Web Browsers popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

S
Surf
E
Ember-cli
Website surf.suckless.org cli.emberjs.com
Listed in
Cryptocurrencies Crypto Web Browsers Web3 +1
Developer Tools Design Tools Productivity

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

S
Surf 5 features
E
Ember-cli 5 features
  • Minimalism
    Surf is extremely lightweight and focuses on offering a minimalistic web browsing experience, which can result in faster performance and lower resource usage.
  • Customizability
    Users can tailor Surf to their specific needs through patches and configuration. This makes it highly adaptable for those who are comfortable with a bit of coding.
  • Integration with Suckless Tools
    Surf fits seamlessly into the Suckless ecosystem, integrating well with other minimal and efficient tools like the DWM window manager.
  • Privacy
    By default, Surf doesn't include many of the tracking features found in mainstream browsers, potentially offering a more privacy-conscious browsing experience.
  • Compliance with UNIX Philosophy
    Surf adheres to the UNIX philosophy of doing one thing well, focusing solely on web browsing without additional, potentially unwanted, features.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Customizing and configuring Surf can be challenging for users who are not familiar with programming or the command line.
  • Limited Features
    Due to its minimalistic design, Surf lacks many modern features like extensions, tabs, and a built-in password manager that are standard in other browsers.
  • Manual Updates
    Users need to manually update the browser, which can be a hassle compared to automatic updates provided by mainstream browsers.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Surf may have trouble rendering some modern web pages correctly, as it lacks some of the compatibility layers found in more feature-complete browsers.
  • Community Support
    Being a niche and minimalist browser, Surf does not have as large a user base or as much community support compared to more popular browsers.
  • Convention over Configuration
    Ember-cli enforces strong conventions for file structure, naming, and project organization, which reduces decision fatigue and makes it easier for developers to jump between different Ember projects with minimal onboarding time.
  • Built-in Tooling
    Comes with a robust set of built-in tools including a development server, testing framework integration (QUnit), asset compilation, and live reload, reducing the need to manually configure and integrate third-party build tools.
  • Addon Ecosystem
    Ember-cli supports a rich ecosystem of addons that can be easily installed and integrated into projects, allowing developers to extend functionality without reinventing the wheel for common features.
  • Blueprints and Generators
    Provides powerful generator commands (blueprints) that scaffold components, routes, models, and other application pieces quickly, speeding up development and ensuring consistency across the codebase.
  • Stable Long-term Support
    Ember-cli follows Ember's release cycle with clear LTS (Long Term Support) versions, providing stability and predictability for teams maintaining large applications over time.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep Learning Curve
    The strict conventions and unique architecture of Ember-cli can be difficult for newcomers to learn, especially those coming from more flexible frameworks or with no prior Ember experience.
  • Smaller Community Compared to Alternatives
    Compared to tools like Vite, Webpack, or CRA used with React/Vue, Ember-cli has a smaller community and ecosystem, which can mean fewer third-party resources, tutorials, and community-driven troubleshooting.
  • Build Performance
    For large applications, Ember-cli's build process can become slow, and while improvements have been made with embroider, some developers still report slower build times compared to more modern bundlers.
  • Rigid Structure
    The opinionated nature of Ember-cli, while helpful for consistency, can feel restrictive for developers who prefer more flexibility in structuring their applications or adopting non-standard patterns.
  • Migration Complexity
    Upgrading between major Ember-cli versions or migrating to newer build systems like Embroider can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for older or heavily customized applications.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

S
Surf
E
Ember-cli

Overall verdict

  • Surf can be considered 'good' for users who value simplicity, minimal system resource usage, and the ability to customize their browsing experience via external scripts or patches. However, it might not be suitable for those who rely heavily on modern web features and extensions available in mainstream browsers.

Why this product is good

  • Surf is a minimalist web browser created by the Suckless community, known for developing software that adheres to the philosophy of simplicity and clarity. It is designed to be lightweight and efficient, making it suitable for users who prefer minimalism and are comfortable using a browser without a graphical user interface (GUI) for settings or extensions.

Recommended for

  • Users who are familiar with Unix-like operating systems and command-line interfaces.
  • Individuals who prefer lightweight and efficient software.
  • Those willing to customize their browser through external tools and scripts.
  • Minimalists who do not require a plethora of features and extensions.

Overall verdict

  • Ember CLI is a solid, mature command-line tool for building Ember.js applications, offering strong conventions, built-in tooling, and a stable development workflow that has been refined over many years.

Why this product is good

  • Provides a standardized project structure and conventions, reducing setup decisions and configuration overhead
  • Includes built-in support for ES modules, testing, and asset compilation out of the box
  • Strong addon ecosystem allows easy integration of third-party functionality
  • Backed by the official Ember.js team, ensuring long-term support and consistent updates
  • Automatic reloading and rebuilding during development speeds up the workflow
  • Encourages best practices like testing and modular code organization

Recommended for

  • Teams building large-scale, maintainable web applications with Ember.js
  • Developers who prefer convention-over-configuration frameworks
  • Projects that require long-term stability and structured upgrade paths
  • Organizations already invested in the Ember.js ecosystem
  • Developers who value built-in testing and tooling integration without extra setup

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

S
Surf 3 videos + Add
E
Ember-cli 0 videos + Add

Pro Surfer Reviews Surf Movies, from 'Blue Crush' to 'Point Break' | Vanity Fair

More videos

  • - Noel's "2021 Favorite Finds" Surfboards & Surf Product Must Haves
  • - Surf Tip "How to Surf Faster in Small Waves" Part 1

No Ember-cli videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
S
Surf
E
Ember-cli
100% 100%
Web Browsers
0% 0%
0% 0%
Productivity
100% 100%
100% 100%
Crypto
0% 0%
0% 0%
Design Tools
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Surf and Ember-cli. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

S
Surf 46 mentions
E
Ember-cli 1 mention
  • My server is a phone now
    When I read about the browser 'surf', I first thought of the browser from suckless: https://surf.suckless.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • How to build a circular LCD clock
    Interesting, surf is based off WebKit2. https://surf.suckless.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Ladybird browser spreads its wings
    What about surf? https://surf.suckless.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

View more

  • Help! Why does chrome console inner text and my program inner text not return the same values? (spent nearly the whole day trying to extract an element). Turned to reddit as its always had the best community. Any help is MASSIVELY appreciated. Puppeteer!!
    The webpage is LinkedIn.com. While this isn’t a framework, I know that are using https://cli.emberjs.com/release/. Source: about 5 years ago

Alternatives to Surf and Ember-cli

When comparing Surf and Ember-cli, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...