Sumo Logic
Datadog
Dynatrace
LogicMonitor
Logz.io
Splunk Enterprise
Zabbix
Graylog
Cppcheck
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
lgtm.com
SonarQube
VisualCodeGrepper
Flawfinder
Parasoft C/C++test
Sumo Logic
CppcheckCppcheck is recommended for C/C++ developers and development teams, particularly those responsible for maintaining large codebases or projects where code quality and reliability are paramount. It is also beneficial for educational purposes, where students and new developers can learn about potential pitfalls in C/C++ programming.
Based on our record, Cppcheck should be more popular than Sumo Logic. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Hello, my name is Caleb. I'm a product manager by trade, and have enjoyed working in/around the software industry over the past 15 years. I was most recently CEO & co-founder at Sensu (https://sensu.io), which was eventually acquired by Sumo Logic (https://sumologic.com), resulting in my "funemployment". I've met so many people over the course of my career who are interested in making websites โ they even teach... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
He's coming with years of experience of having architected systems at Uber, Flock, Sumo Logic and was a founding engineer who helped design the cryptography primitives at Zeta. Someone of his caliber coming onboard means that we'll be able to ship nicer things faster. ๐. Source: about 5 years ago
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 3 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: about 3 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: about 3 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 3 years ago
Datadog - See metrics from all of your apps, tools & services in one place with Datadog's cloud monitoring as a service solution. Try it for free.
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
Dynatrace - Cloud-based quality testing, performance monitoring and analytics for mobile apps and websites. Get started with Keynote today!
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
LogicMonitor - LogicMonitor is the SaaS performance monitoring platform for the world's best IT teams. Deploy Fast, Monitor More, Improve Ops.
lgtm.com - lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.