Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Submittable VS Materialize CSS

Compare Submittable VS Materialize CSS and see what are their differences

Submittable

Submittable is an easy-to-use online submission manager.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Materialize CSS

A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
PromptBrake
Automated AI security testing for agents, chatbots, and APIs. Find prompt injection, data leaks, and unsafe behavior before launch. sponsored
This page does not exist

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Materialize CSS should be more popular than Submittable. It has been mentioned 28 times since March 2021.

social mentions
5 vs 28
ERP popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Submittable
Materialize CSS
Website submittable.com materializecss.com
Pricing
Official pricing
Open source
Listed in
ERP Awards Management Nonprofit Accounting & Finance +1
CSS Framework Design Tools Developer Tools Development Tools +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Submittable 5 features
Materialize CSS 5 features
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Submittable offers an intuitive and easy-to-use interface for both submitters and reviewers, which simplifies the submission and review process.
  • Streamlined Workflow
    The platform supports a streamlined workflow with automated email notifications, task assignments, and status tracking, improving efficiency in managing submissions.
  • Customizable Forms
    Users can create fully customizable submission forms tailored to their specific needs, allowing for more precise data collection.
  • Collaboration Tools
    Submittable provides robust collaboration tools, allowing multiple reviewers to provide feedback, discuss submissions, and make collective decisions.
  • Analytics and Reporting
    The platform offers detailed analytics and reporting features, enabling users to track submission trends, reviewer activity, and overall performance.

Possible disadvantages

  • Pricing
    Submittable can be expensive, especially for smaller organizations or individuals, as pricing scales with the volume of submissions and additional features.
  • Limited Free Plan
    The free plan offered by Submittable is quite limited in terms of features and submission volume, necessitating an upgrade for more robust needs.
  • Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, there can be a learning curve for new users to fully utilize all the advanced features and functionalities.
  • Customization Limitations
    Although forms are customizable, some users may find limitations in customizing the broader workflow and integration aspects to fit their unique requirements.
  • Dependency on Internet
    As a cloud-based platform, Submittable requires a reliable internet connection for access, which can be a drawback in areas with poor connectivity.
  • Responsive Design
    Materialize CSS provides a responsive grid system, making it easier to create layouts that work well on various screen sizes and devices.
  • Material Design
    Adheres to Google's Material Design principles, offering a modern and professional look that is consistent across web applications.
  • Component Variety
    Offers a wide range of pre-built components, including forms, buttons, cards, and navigation bars, which helps speed up development.
  • Customization
    Provides options to customize components using Sass, making it flexible for specific design needs.
  • Built-in JavaScript
    Includes built-in JavaScript components like modals, carousels, and tabs, which enhance functionality without requiring additional libraries.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    Although it follows Material Design guidelines, there is a learning curve associated with understanding and implementing its various components and classes.
  • File Size
    Including the full library can make your project heavier, affecting load times, especially for users on slower connections.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customizable, deeply customizing or overriding default styles can sometimes be complicated and time-consuming.
  • Dependency on jQuery
    Some components still rely on jQuery, adding to the library size and potentially conflicting with modern JavaScript practices.
  • Community Support
    Compared to larger frameworks like Bootstrap, Materialize CSS has a smaller community, which can result in fewer third-party resources and plugins.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Submittable
Materialize CSS

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Submittable is considered a good platform.

Why this product is good

  • Submittable is a widely-used submission management platform known for its user-friendly interface, comprehensive features, and flexibility in handling a range of submission types. It is praised for streamlining the process of collecting and reviewing submissions, offering customization options for forms, and facilitating effective communication between submitters and administrators. Users appreciate its robust reporting tools and integrations with other services.

Recommended for

    Submittable is recommended for organizations and individuals who need an efficient way to manage and review submissions, such as literary journals, film festivals, grant programs, and scholarship providers. It's well-suited for teams that require collaboration in the decision-making process and for those seeking to enhance their submission workflows with automated tools.

Overall verdict

  • Materialize CSS is a good choice if you're looking for a framework that emphasizes Material Design and comes with a sleek, modern interface. It's particularly useful for developers who want to quickly integrate Google's design philosophy without delving into custom styling or layout creation.

Why this product is good

  • Materialize CSS is a front-end framework based on Material Design principles developed by Google. It provides a comprehensive set of UI components that help developers create visually appealing and responsive web applications quickly. The framework includes a variety of pre-styled components like buttons, forms, cards, and much more, which adhere to the Material Design guidelines. This consistency in design components helps ensure a cohesive and professional look across web applications. Additionally, it simplifies responsive design with a grid system that's easy to implement, and it comes with excellent documentation and a supportive community.

Recommended for

    Materialize CSS is recommended for teams and developers who prefer Google's Material Design aesthetic, are building applications with a focus on rapid UI development, and value consistency and ease of use. It's also great for projects where a pre-existing UI library speeds up the development process, such as prototypes, admin dashboards, or smaller web applications. However, for highly customized UI components or non-Material Design projects, other frameworks might be more suitable.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Submittable 3 videos + Add
Materialize CSS 1 video + Add

Submittable: Accept and review any digital content

More videos

  • - What is Submittable?
  • - Submittable: Submissions made simple

Build A Travel Agency Theme With Materialize CSS 1.0.0

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Submittable
Materialize CSS
100% 100%
ERP
0% 0%
0% 0%
Design Tools
100% 100%
100% 100%
Event Management
0% 0%
0% 0%
CSS Framework
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Submittable and Materialize CSS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Submittable no reviews yet
Materialize CSS no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Submittable yet. Be the first one to post

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Submittable 5 mentions
Materialize CSS 28 mentions
  • Looking for art zines
    Try checking out Submittable https://submittable.com/ and Chillsubs https://chillsubs.com/ to look for journals, zines and other publications that are seeking art :) Good luck! Source: about 4 years ago
  • [HELP] How to publish as a new poet.
    You send them into literary magazines & journals. chillsubs.com + submittable.com + duotrope.com are good places to start. Source: over 4 years ago
  • [help]
    You'll need a Submittable account for most mainstream submissions these days. Source: over 4 years ago

View more

  • JavaScript Awesome Package
    Materialize - Responsive front-end framework based on Material Design. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Mistakes Were Made
    Sure, why not use Blazor? It makes life easier for the developers who are primarily backend, to work on the frontend as well. Seems like the better choice. So what's next? The UI library. No shade to the long-time standing Bootstrap, but... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Top 5 Best CSS Frameworks for Responsive Web Design in 2024
    Materialize is a modern CSS framework based on Google’s Material Design. It was created and designed by Google to provide a unified and consistent user interface across all its products. Materialize is focused on user experience as it... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Submittable and Materialize CSS

When comparing Submittable and Materialize CSS, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...