Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Pipedream seems to be a lot more popular than Submit.co. While we know about 51 links to Pipedream, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Submit.co.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
S
Submit.co
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | submit.co | pipedream.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

No analysis of Submit.co yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Pipedream is recommended for developers, especially those working in small to medium-sized enterprises, startups, or any environment where rapid development and deployment of API integrations are needed. It's also suitable for developers who appreciate serverless architecture and need to automate workflows without managing the underlying infrastructure.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No Submit.co videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Using Event Sources and Workflows: Analyze Twitter Sentiment in Real-Time and Save to Google Sheets
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Share your experience with using Submit.co and Pipedream. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

We have no reviews of Submit.co yet. Be the first one to post
Pipedream fits teams that want automation to feel more like a programmable integration layer, especially when engineers want to write logic and work directly with APIs.
Finally, Pipedream focuses on better support for complex Zapier use-cases by providing a platform that software engineers can use to create more technical and nuanced integrations.
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Fun story: I built BetaList 16 years ago which was one of the first "product discovery" platforms. Years before Product Hunt, etc. I manually reviewed every submission and unfortunately often I had to tell founders that their startup... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
First, I crawled and audited all the available data from similar lists. Startup directories, such as those found on GitHub and Submit.co websites are the few standing out in terms of quality. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
Very cool. Just submitted to submit.co. Source: over 5 years ago
Pipedream: Fast workflows with visual builder and real code. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
With our REST APIs, it is now possible for any developer to set up an integration and document workflow using their language of choice. But what about workflow automations? Luckily, this is even simpler (of course, depending on platform)... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Alright, time to automate this. For my automation, I'll be making use of Pipedream, an incredibly flexible workflow system I've used many times in the past. Here's the entire workflow with each part built out:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
When comparing Submit.co and Pipedream, you can also consider the following products.


Connect the apps you use everyday to automate your work and be more productive. 1000+ apps and easy integrations - get started in minutes.
Compare Zapier to Submit.co or Pipedream:

Free and curated list of startup directories to promote your new startup. We manually post your startup to more than 150+ relevant directories and blogs to help your startup get discovered.
Compare Submit Juice to Submit.co or Pipedream:

Free and open fair-code licensed node based Workflow Automation Tool. Easily automate tasks across different services.
Compare n8n.io to Submit.co or Pipedream:

Free list of 1100+ media outlets to pitch your startup
Compare Promotehour to Submit.co or Pipedream:

Tool for workflow automation (Former Integromat)
Compare Make.com to Submit.co or Pipedream: