Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Stonly VS Fig Scripts

Compare Stonly VS Fig Scripts and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Stonly logo Stonly

Create interactive step-by-step guides
Build internal CLI tools, really fast
  • Stonly Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-20
  • Fig Scripts Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-08

Stonly

Website
stonly.com
Release Date
2018 January
Startup details
Country
France
City
Levallois
Founder(s)
Alexis Fogel
Employees
10 - 19

Fig Scripts

Website
fig.io
Pricing URL
-
Release Date
-

Stonly features and specs

  • Interactive Tutorials
    Stonly offers interactive step-by-step tutorials that can engage users better compared to traditional static guides. This interactivity helps in improving user comprehension and retention.
  • Customization
    The platform allows for high levels of customization, enabling organizations to tailor the tutorials and guides to match their branding and specific needs.
  • Analytics
    Stonly provides robust analytics features that allow organizations to track user interactions with guides and tutorials, helping them to understand better what works and what needs improvement.
  • Integrations
    The tool integrates with various third-party applications like Intercom, Zendesk, and more, making it easy to incorporate into existing workflows.
  • No Coding Required
    Users do not need any coding skills to create interactive guides and tutorials, making it accessible to a wider range of users within an organization.

Possible disadvantages of Stonly

  • Cost
    Stonly can be expensive, particularly for small businesses or startups with limited budgets, potentially making it less accessible for these organizations.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite being user-friendly, there is still a learning curve associated with mastering all of its features and making the most out of the platform.
  • Limited Offline Access
    Since Stonly is primarily a web-based platform, offline access to tutorials and guides is very limited, which can be a drawback in environments where internet access is unreliable.
  • Dependency on Platform
    Using a third-party platform means that organizations could become dependent on Stonly for their tutorials, which may present issues if the platform experiences downtime or other service issues.
  • Customization Limits
    Although highly customizable, there are still some limitations in design and functionality that may not meet the specific needs of every user or organization.

Fig Scripts features and specs

  • Pre-built automation scripts
    Fig Scripts provides a library of pre-built scripts that help developers automate common tasks, saving significant time on repetitive terminal workflows without needing to write scripts from scratch.
  • Easy integration with the terminal
    Fig Scripts integrates seamlessly with the terminal environment, allowing users to run and manage scripts directly within their existing workflow without needing to switch between tools or interfaces.
  • Community-driven collection
    The scripts are community-driven, meaning developers can benefit from the collective knowledge and contributions of other developers, gaining access to a diverse range of useful automation solutions.
  • Customizable and extensible
    Users can modify existing scripts or create their own to fit specific use cases, making the tool flexible enough to accommodate a wide variety of development workflows and personal preferences.
  • Developer-focused design
    Fig Scripts is built specifically for developers, so the scripts and tooling are tailored to common development tasks like Git operations, environment setup, deployment, and other engineering-centric workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Fig Scripts

  • Limited platform support
    Fig was historically focused on macOS, which limited its availability to developers working on Linux or Windows platforms, reducing its appeal for cross-platform teams.
  • Dependency on Fig ecosystem
    Using Fig Scripts often requires having the broader Fig (now acquired by AWS and rebranded) tooling installed, creating a dependency on an external ecosystem that may change or be discontinued.
  • Uncertain future after acquisition
    After Fig was acquired by Amazon and integrated into AWS, the future direction and continued support of Fig Scripts became uncertain, raising concerns about long-term reliability for users who depend on it.
  • Limited script discoverability
    Finding the right script for a specific use case can be challenging, as the library may not be as well-organized or searchable as more mature package managers or script repositories.
  • Learning curve for customization
    While pre-built scripts are easy to use, customizing or creating new scripts requires understanding Fig's specific configuration format and conventions, which adds a learning curve beyond standard shell scripting.

Analysis of Fig Scripts

Overall verdict

  • Fig Scripts, part of the Fig platform, was a well-regarded tool for terminal autocomplete and productivity, though it's important to note that Fig was acquired by AWS in 2023 and its standalone product was eventually sunset, with much of its technology being integrated into Amazon Q Developer (formerly CodeWhisperer/CLI). If you're referring to the legacy Fig tool, it was generally well-liked for its user-friendly approach to terminal enhancement.

Why this product is good

  • Provided IDE-style autocomplete for hundreds of CLI tools directly in the terminal
  • Easy to install and integrated seamlessly with existing shell environments like bash, zsh, and fish
  • Offered a visual, intuitive interface for command discovery without needing to leave the terminal
  • Supported scripting and customization for teams to build their own autocomplete specs
  • Had a strong open-source community contributing autocomplete definitions for various tools

Recommended for

  • Developers who spend significant time in the terminal and want to reduce typing errors
  • Teams looking to standardize CLI usage with custom autocomplete scripts
  • New developers learning complex CLI tools who benefit from visual command suggestions
  • Users who prioritize terminal productivity and efficiency
  • Those already using AWS tools who might now prefer transitioning to Amazon Q Developer for similar functionality

Stonly videos

Add and edit media in Stonly

More videos:

  • Review - AWS & Dashlane/Stonly | Les conseils du fondateur #StartupMoments

Fig Scripts videos

No Fig Scripts videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Stonly and Fig Scripts)
User Onboarding And Engagement
Productivity
85 85%
15% 15
User Engagement
100 100%
0% 0
Web Icons
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Stonly and Fig Scripts. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Stonly and Fig Scripts

Stonly Reviews

11 Popular Knowledge Management Tools to Consider in 2025ย 
The future of customer service hinges on the quality of your knowledge. Thatโ€™s why Stonlyโ€™s knowledge base platform allows you to create content that makes it easier for people to get the help they need, and deliver that help when and where itโ€™s needed. With generative AI and powerful search, Stonly lets you turn your knowledge into instant, accurate answers.With Stonly you...
Source: knowmax.ai
8 Best Usetiful Alternatives and Competitors That Are More Professional
โŒ If you want to integrate Stonly into your UI elements, and, of course, implement Stonlyโ€™s knowledge base and help center into your platform, youโ€™ll definitely need a bunch of developer hours to get it done.
Source: userguiding.com
Top alternatives to UserGuiding
Like Usetiful and Lou, Stonly has a free forever plan limited to 5 guides, no team seats and 1000 guide views per month. Stonly Pricing

Fig Scripts Reviews

We have no reviews of Fig Scripts yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Stonly seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Stonly mentions (1)

Fig Scripts mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Fig Scripts yet. Tracking of Fig Scripts recommendations started around Feb 2023.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Stonly and Fig Scripts, you can also consider the following products

UserGuiding - Create in-app experiences with the most straightforward product adoption platform โ€” quick implementation, lasting user engagement.

Icons8 - Free app for Mac & Windows already containing 39,800 icons. Allows to search and import iconsโ€ฆ

Intercom - Intercom is a customer relationship management and messaging tool for web businesses. Build relationships with users to create loyal customers.

Appcues - Improve user onboarding, feature activation & more โ€” no code required! Stop waiting on dev and start increasing customer engagement today. Try it for free.

Dozuki - Dozuki is a web-based tool for creating and distributing step-by-step documentation.

Userlane - Userlane helps healthcare, financial services, manufacturing, and pharma organizations close the gap between deploying software and AI and people using it well. See where technology creates friction. Fix it in context. Prove it worked.