
ChatGPT
Perplexity.ai
stashd.ai
Stroo
Stobo helps businesses get cited in AI search engines like ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity. Increase citation rates by 40-60% within 1-2 weeks through technical audits and copy-paste implementation code.

Compute various size metrics for a Git repository, flagging those that might cause problems - github/git-sizer

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, git-sizer seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | trystobo.com | github.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | Startup from France · 1 - 9 employees · 2025 | — |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


Stobo is an Answer Engine Optimization tool that audits websites for AI search visibility. It analyzes six technical factors that determine whether ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews will cite your business. The audit checks robots.txt configuration for AI crawlers, llms.txt...
No description of git-sizer yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Stobo and git-sizer.
Stobo's answer
We built it for ourselves. As a two-person team shipping products, we needed AI search visibility but found only monitoring tools or expensive agencies. So we built what we wanted: an audit that generates the actual fixes. When we showed founders, 64% wanted to try it immediately.
Stobo's answer
Stobo's answer
Stobo runs on modern web infrastructure optimized for speed. The audit completes in under 60 seconds, and full implementation reports generate in about 45. We chose our stack specifically for fast, reliable analysis at scale. Standard cloud hosting keeps everything responsive.
Stobo's answer
Stobo tells you how to fix visibility problems, not just that they exist. Most AEO tools monitor your AI citations. We generate production-ready code: robots.txt rules, JSON-LD schema blocks, llms.txt files, and bespoke FAQ content. You copy, paste, and deploy. No developer needed, no weeks of research.
Stobo's answer
Competitors charge $300-500/month to track citations. Stobo gives you a free audit in 60 seconds, then a complete implementation report for €199 once. No subscription. No dashboard you need to check weekly. Just the fixes, ready to deploy. Most sites go from below 40 to above 80 in a single sprint.
Stobo's answer
Startup founders and marketing teams who need AI visibility but lack time for another learning curve. Technical enough to copy-paste code, busy enough to value implementation over theory. Typically bootstrapped or small teams competing against companies with dedicated SEO resources.
Share your experience with using Stobo and git-sizer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking Stobo since Dec 2025.
Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago
When comparing Stobo and git-sizer, you can also consider the following products.



Organizes code snippets with AI-powered generation, full-text search, multi-fragment grouping, real-time offline sync, rich metadata, automated tags, and link-based sharing while supporting multi-device access, customizable themes, and contextual AI…
Compare stashd.ai to Stobo or git-sizer:
