Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Step CI VS restclient.el

Compare Step CI VS restclient.el and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Step CI logo Step CI

API Testing and Monitoring made simple

restclient.el logo restclient.el

HTTP REST client tool for emacs
  • Step CI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-13
  • restclient.el Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-23

Step CI features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Step CI provides an intuitive user interface that makes it accessible for users of varying technical expertise. This ease of use helps teams adopt it without a steep learning curve.
  • Integration
    Step CI integrates seamlessly with a variety of third-party tools and services, allowing teams to create flexible and powerful CI pipelines without extensive reconfiguration of their existing environment.
  • Scalability
    The platform is designed to handle projects of different sizes, making it suitable for both small startups and large enterprises looking to scale their continuous integration processes.
  • Customization
    Step CI offers plenty of customization options, enabling teams to tailor their CI/CD pipelines according to specific project requirements and workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Step CI

  • Pricing
    Pricing for Step CI may be higher compared to other CI/CD tools, especially for startups or smaller teams with limited budgets.
  • Limited Documentation
    Some users may find the available documentation insufficient or lacking in detail, which can lead to slower implementation and troubleshooting times.
  • Feature Gaps
    While Step CI offers a robust set of features, there may be certain advanced functionalities that other competitors provide, which Step CI may lack, potentially leading to constraints for some users.

restclient.el features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    restclient.el allows users to interact with RESTful services from within Emacs, leveraging familiar keybindings and UI, which simplifies the learning curve for Emacs users.
  • Integration with Emacs
    As an Emacs package, it integrates seamlessly with other Emacs features and workflows, such as Org mode for documentation or Magit for version control.
  • Lightweight
    Being an Emacs package, it is relatively lightweight compared to full-fledged GUI REST clients, offering quick installation and minimal resource consumption.
  • Scripting Capabilities
    Users can script and automate their HTTP requests, leveraging Emacs Lisp, which can be more powerful than traditional GUI-based REST clients.

Possible disadvantages of restclient.el

  • Emacs Dependency
    Since it runs within Emacs, users who are not familiar with Emacs might find the setup and usage more challenging compared to standalone applications.
  • Limited Features Compared to GUI Tools
    Compared to dedicated GUI tools like Postman, restclient.el lacks advanced features such as a comprehensive GUI, response visualization, and environment management.
  • Steeper Learning Curve for Non-Emacs Users
    For users not already familiar with Emacs, the need to learn Emacs conventions and keybindings can pose an additional barrier.
  • Less Intuitive for Large API Testing
    Organizing and managing large sets of API endpoints and tests might be less intuitive without a graphical interface or built-in management features.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Step CI and restclient.el)

Step CI

restclient.el

Developer Tools
47 47%
Developer Tools
53% 53
API Tools
39 39%
API Tools
61% 61
API
65 65%
API
35% 35
APIs
41 41%
APIs
59% 59

User comments

Share your experience with using Step CI and restclient.el. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Step CI should be more popular than restclient.el. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Step CI mentions (12)

  • SOAP API Testing Guide
    Key Tools: SoapUI (free and Pro versions) for Functional, security, and load testing or Step CI for a modern, open-source alternative that focused on workflow testing. - Source: dev.to / 30 days ago
  • Why Feedback Loops Matter in API Development
    CI/CD testing: As mentioned earlier, if you have fast preview deployments Of your API hooked up to your PRs, you can use a tool like StepCI to run integration and end-to-end tests as a part of your development workflow. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Show HN: Simplifying Back end Testing with qapir.io
    How is it different from Step CI? https://stepci.com. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • End-to-End API Testing Guide and Best Practices
    Top Tools: Use Postman for a visual approach to E2E testing, StepCI for CI/CD integration, and Playwright for all-in-one testing. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • TypeScript NPM Packages Done Right
    The problem is that you can import commonjs modules in ESM but not the other way around. For stepci (https://stepci.com) we have chosen to not support ESM for this very reason. We want that the library “just works” for all our users. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
View more

restclient.el mentions (6)

  • Emacs Advent Calendar 9: devdocs, code-cells, dREPL, etc.
    Plz-see: Interactive HTTP client, similar to restclient and verb, but using Elisp instead of a special text-based syntax. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Hurl 4.0.0
    Emacs enthusiasts have https://github.com/pashky/restclient.el I see some parallels to Hurl, but having everything inside Emacs is hard to beat, just thinking about using M-x jq-interactivly for json responses ... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Hurl, run and test HTTP requests with plain text
    I recently switch from custom Bash wrappers around curl to restclient.el [1]. It has similar features. Especially nice is the integration with jq for fetching specific data (or inspection of results with jq-mode). And, whoever is inclined to appreciate it, the fact that I can stay within Emacs. No need to get familiar with a new UI/UX. [1]: https://github.com/pashky/restclient.el. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • Show HN: Restfox – A web based HTTP client inspired by Insomnia and Postman
    Although I mainly stick with curl or requests due to muscle memory, there's also restclient.el https://github.com/pashky/restclient.el. I imagine having builtin org support is super convenient, thanks for sharing. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • Which IDE/Editor is Your Daily driver?
    Right now I am writing a document in org-mode (human readable) and with a bit of help from org-ql I am converting it into json for API consumption, which I am also testing with resclient.el. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Step CI and restclient.el, you can also consider the following products

Restfox.dev - Browser based HTTP client inspired by Insomnia and Postman

Insomnia REST - Design, debug, test, and mock APIs locally, on Git, or cloud. Build better APIs collaboratively for the most popular protocols with a dev‑friendly UI, built-in automation, and an extensible plugin ecosystem.

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

Hoppscotch - Open source API development ecosystem

RecipeUI - Open source type-safe Postman alternative

RapidAPI for Mac - Paw is a REST client for Mac.

Loading...