Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

RapidAPI for Mac VS restclient.el

Compare RapidAPI for Mac VS restclient.el and see what are their differences

RapidAPI for Mac logo RapidAPI for Mac

Paw is a REST client for Mac.

restclient.el logo restclient.el

HTTP REST client tool for emacs
  • RapidAPI for Mac Landing page
    Landing page //
    2024-10-20
  • restclient.el Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-23

RapidAPI for Mac features and specs

  • User Interface
    Paw.cloud offers an intuitive and visually appealing user interface, making it easy to design and manage APIs.
  • Team Collaboration
    Paw.cloud supports team collaboration features, allowing multiple users to work on API projects simultaneously.
  • Advanced Request Capabilities
    The platform offers advanced request capabilities, including the ability to customize headers, parameters, and bodies with ease.
  • Extensions and Plugins
    Paw.cloud supports a variety of extensions and plugins, allowing users to extend its functionalities according to their needs.
  • Multi-Environment Support
    The tool provides support for multiple environments, enabling seamless switching between development, staging, and production setups.

Possible disadvantages of RapidAPI for Mac

  • Cost
    Paw.cloud is a paid service, which may not be suitable for individuals or small teams with limited budgets.
  • Platform Limitation
    The software is currently available only for macOS, which limits its accessibility to a wider range of users who might be using other operating systems.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, there is still a learning curve for new users to fully utilize all of its advanced features.
  • Resource Intensive
    Paw.cloud can be resource-intensive, potentially slowing down performance on older hardware.
  • Offline Accessibility
    Some functionalities may be limited or unavailable in offline mode, which could hinder productivity in environments with unstable internet connections.

restclient.el features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    restclient.el allows users to interact with RESTful services from within Emacs, leveraging familiar keybindings and UI, which simplifies the learning curve for Emacs users.
  • Integration with Emacs
    As an Emacs package, it integrates seamlessly with other Emacs features and workflows, such as Org mode for documentation or Magit for version control.
  • Lightweight
    Being an Emacs package, it is relatively lightweight compared to full-fledged GUI REST clients, offering quick installation and minimal resource consumption.
  • Scripting Capabilities
    Users can script and automate their HTTP requests, leveraging Emacs Lisp, which can be more powerful than traditional GUI-based REST clients.

Possible disadvantages of restclient.el

  • Emacs Dependency
    Since it runs within Emacs, users who are not familiar with Emacs might find the setup and usage more challenging compared to standalone applications.
  • Limited Features Compared to GUI Tools
    Compared to dedicated GUI tools like Postman, restclient.el lacks advanced features such as a comprehensive GUI, response visualization, and environment management.
  • Steeper Learning Curve for Non-Emacs Users
    For users not already familiar with Emacs, the need to learn Emacs conventions and keybindings can pose an additional barrier.
  • Less Intuitive for Large API Testing
    Organizing and managing large sets of API endpoints and tests might be less intuitive without a graphical interface or built-in management features.

RapidAPI for Mac videos

Dr Paw Paw Review & Demo | Abbey Clayton

More videos:

  • Review - Paw Perfect Review - Testing As Seen On TV Products
  • Review - PAW PATROL: ON A ROLL - REVIEW

restclient.el videos

No restclient.el videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RapidAPI for Mac and restclient.el)
API Tools
89 89%
11% 11
Developer Tools
83 83%
17% 17
APIs
90 90%
10% 10
API Management
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using RapidAPI for Mac and restclient.el. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare RapidAPI for Mac and restclient.el

RapidAPI for Mac Reviews

Top 10 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools (2023)
Are you a developer that works with macOS? Then Paw is the right pick for you. Paw is specifically built for macOS. As such, it is arguably the best tool for Mac interface. Unlike Postman which majorly revolves around API, Paw is an all-in-one tool for API development, HTTP Client, API description, and more. In terms of its functionalities, it can send all kinds of HTTP...
12 HTTP Client and Web Debugging Proxy Tools
Paw is a full-featured HTTP client, which allows you to send all kinds of HTTP requests. With Paw, you can test your APIs and also explore new ones.
Source: geekflare.com
15 Best Postman Alternatives for Automated API Testing [2022 Updated]
Paw is an advanced API tool with powerful features designed explicitly for Mac. Its primary function is to test and describe APIs, and it provides a beautiful interface to make activities such as composing requests, inspecting server responses, and exporting API definitions easier.
Source: testsigma.com

restclient.el Reviews

We have no reviews of restclient.el yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, RapidAPI for Mac should be more popular than restclient.el. It has been mentiond 45 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RapidAPI for Mac mentions (45)

  • Learning API Requests with GUI client - The easy way🚀🚀
    Although Apidog is a popular REST client, you can also use others, such as Insomnia, RapidAPI for Mac, and Hoppscotch. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Sending both File and JSON in One Request to Spring Boot
    But it can't help when faced with this complex scenario because it doesn't support set the content-type for text field of a multipart request. I tried Paw, Bruno and they didn't work either. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • The Best Alternatives to Postman for API Testing
    To use Paw, purchase and download it from the Paw website. Open the app, create a new request, and start testing your API endpoints with ease. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Ask HN: Alternatives to Postman?
    Enjoy it while it lasts: https://paw.cloud/. Really good. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Bruno
    I myself use Paw [0] because it's native to MacOS, but I'm a little bit worried for it's longevity as it being supported by a SaaS business. But so far it's been great to document API for my personal projects. [0]: https://paw.cloud/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

restclient.el mentions (6)

  • Emacs Advent Calendar 9: devdocs, code-cells, dREPL, etc.
    Plz-see: Interactive HTTP client, similar to restclient and verb, but using Elisp instead of a special text-based syntax. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Hurl 4.0.0
    Emacs enthusiasts have https://github.com/pashky/restclient.el I see some parallels to Hurl, but having everything inside Emacs is hard to beat, just thinking about using M-x jq-interactivly for json responses ... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Hurl, run and test HTTP requests with plain text
    I recently switch from custom Bash wrappers around curl to restclient.el [1]. It has similar features. Especially nice is the integration with jq for fetching specific data (or inspection of results with jq-mode). And, whoever is inclined to appreciate it, the fact that I can stay within Emacs. No need to get familiar with a new UI/UX. [1]: https://github.com/pashky/restclient.el. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Show HN: Restfox – A web based HTTP client inspired by Insomnia and Postman
    Although I mainly stick with curl or requests due to muscle memory, there's also restclient.el https://github.com/pashky/restclient.el. I imagine having builtin org support is super convenient, thanks for sharing. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Which IDE/Editor is Your Daily driver?
    Right now I am writing a document in org-mode (human readable) and with a bit of help from org-ql I am converting it into json for API consumption, which I am also testing with resclient.el. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RapidAPI for Mac and restclient.el, you can also consider the following products

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

Insomnia REST - Design, debug, test, and mock APIs locally, on Git, or cloud. Build better APIs collaboratively for the most popular protocols with a dev‑friendly UI, built-in automation, and an extensible plugin ecosystem.

Hoppscotch - Open source API development ecosystem

Apigee - Intelligent and complete API platform

Step CI - API Testing and Monitoring made simple

Amazon API Gateway - Create, publish, maintain, monitor, and secure APIs at any scale