Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Step CI VS Hurl.dev

Compare Step CI VS Hurl.dev and see what are their differences

ScreenshotMAX
The all-in-one Screenshot API for developers: capture websites, generate PDFs, record videos, and automate it all with powerful, scalable infrastructure. No browser setup, no hassle. Just clean results, fast. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Step CI logo Step CI

API Testing and Monitoring made simple

Hurl.dev logo Hurl.dev

Hurl is a command line tool that runs HTTP requests defined in a simple plain text format.
  • Step CI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-13
  • Hurl.dev Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-09

Step CI features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Step CI provides an intuitive user interface that makes it accessible for users of varying technical expertise. This ease of use helps teams adopt it without a steep learning curve.
  • Integration
    Step CI integrates seamlessly with a variety of third-party tools and services, allowing teams to create flexible and powerful CI pipelines without extensive reconfiguration of their existing environment.
  • Scalability
    The platform is designed to handle projects of different sizes, making it suitable for both small startups and large enterprises looking to scale their continuous integration processes.
  • Customization
    Step CI offers plenty of customization options, enabling teams to tailor their CI/CD pipelines according to specific project requirements and workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Step CI

  • Pricing
    Pricing for Step CI may be higher compared to other CI/CD tools, especially for startups or smaller teams with limited budgets.
  • Limited Documentation
    Some users may find the available documentation insufficient or lacking in detail, which can lead to slower implementation and troubleshooting times.
  • Feature Gaps
    While Step CI offers a robust set of features, there may be certain advanced functionalities that other competitors provide, which Step CI may lack, potentially leading to constraints for some users.

Hurl.dev features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Hurl.dev provides a simple and intuitive interface to work with, making it easy for users to compose and test HTTP requests without dealing with the complexity of more advanced tools.
  • Scripting Capabilities
    It offers powerful scripting capabilities using a straightforward syntax, allowing users to automate HTTP requests efficiently.
  • Open Source
    Hurl.dev being open-source allows users to contribute to the development and improvement of the tool, as well as ensuring transparency and reliability.
  • Flexibility
    The tool supports a wide range of HTTP methods and features, accommodating various testing needs and workflows.
  • Integration
    Hurl.dev can easily integrate into existing CI/CD pipelines, streamlining automated testing processes.

Possible disadvantages of Hurl.dev

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to more complex tools, Hurl.dev might lack some advanced features required for extensive API testing and analysis.
  • Learning Curve for Scripting
    While Hurl.dev provides scripting capabilities, users unfamiliar with the syntax may face an initial learning curve.
  • Community Support
    As a newer tool, it might have a smaller community, which can affect the availability of resources and support.
  • Performance Limitations
    Hurl.dev may not handle very large or complex load testing scenarios as efficiently as dedicated load testing tools.
  • Interface Limitations
    The command-line nature of the tool might not appeal to users who prefer graphical user interfaces for managing HTTP requests.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Step CI and Hurl.dev)

Step CI

Hurl.dev

Developer Tools
50 50%
Developer Tools
50% 50
Command Line Tools
0 0%
Command Line Tools
100% 100
API
100 100%
API
0% 0
API Tools
43 43%
API Tools
57% 57

User comments

Share your experience with using Step CI and Hurl.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Hurl.dev should be more popular than Step CI. It has been mentiond 52 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Step CI mentions (12)

  • SOAP API Testing Guide
    Key Tools: SoapUI (free and Pro versions) for Functional, security, and load testing or Step CI for a modern, open-source alternative that focused on workflow testing. - Source: dev.to / 30 days ago
  • Why Feedback Loops Matter in API Development
    CI/CD testing: As mentioned earlier, if you have fast preview deployments Of your API hooked up to your PRs, you can use a tool like StepCI to run integration and end-to-end tests as a part of your development workflow. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Show HN: Simplifying Back end Testing with qapir.io
    How is it different from Step CI? https://stepci.com. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • End-to-End API Testing Guide and Best Practices
    Top Tools: Use Postman for a visual approach to E2E testing, StepCI for CI/CD integration, and Playwright for all-in-one testing. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • TypeScript NPM Packages Done Right
    The problem is that you can import commonjs modules in ESM but not the other way around. For stepci (https://stepci.com) we have chosen to not support ESM for this very reason. We want that the library “just works” for all our users. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
View more

Hurl.dev mentions (52)

  • hurl
    For more details and documentation, check out the official site: https://hurl.dev/. - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago
  • nvim-hurl and Some Intuitions on UX
    I just made a new release to a plugin I've developed to run hurl files (https://hurl.dev/) In Neovim (https://github.com/ethancarlsson/nvim-hurl.nvim/releases/tag/v1.2.0). I really like working on this project, it's designed for me to use and so when I add features I only ever add the features that I'm actually going to use. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Test, Save, and Execute HTTP Requests with Hurl (Or Restclient.el)
    You can see how you can make various asserts here [2] [1]: https://hurl.dev [2]: https://hurl.dev/docs/asserting-response.html. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Rest Easy
    Hi, you may like Hurl [1] it's a cli based on curl to make REST call, add asserts on results, chains requests etc... I'm one of the maintainer [1]: https://hurl.dev. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Show HN: A Fast HTTP Request CLI Powered by HTTL
    It looks similar to https://hurl.dev. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Step CI and Hurl.dev, you can also consider the following products

restclient.el - HTTP REST client tool for emacs

Hoppscotch - Open source API development ecosystem

Restfox.dev - Browser based HTTP client inspired by Insomnia and Postman

Kreya - GUI Client - Kreya is a GUI client for gRPC and REST APIs with innovative features for environments, authorizations and more.

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

Productivity Power Tools - Extension for Visual Studio - A set of extensions to Visual Studio 2012 Professional (and above) which improves developer productivity.

Loading...