Productivity Power Tools VS Hurl.dev

Hello everyone, this is the Data Wrangler team at Microsoft! Over the past year, we've engaged with numerous data scientists who expressed frustration over the time-consuming and often tedious tasks of cleaning, preparing, and analyzing their datasets. This process typically involves a trial-and-error approach, repeatedly searching for the right Pandas API for a transformation and verifying the results by... - Source: Hacker News / about 16 hours ago

If you're in VSCode, GitLens provides this too: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=eamodio.gitlens. - Source: Hacker News / 3 days ago

Https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=AI-Maintainer.ai-maintainer-monty Hi HN, we built Monty: a VS Code extension that connects your code with an LLM. We designed Monty to be privacy friendly: your chat messages are sent directly to your LLM (bring your own key) and we use a local index for RAG (as opposed to a remote service for embedding/storage). If your company restricts tools that send code to... - Source: Hacker News / 5 days ago

Wow, this looks awesome and carefully designed! It even has an official VSCode plugin with a language server[0]. Well done, author! [0] https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=elves.elvish. - Source: Hacker News / 5 days ago

Some prior art from brown university, code bubbles: https://cs.brown.edu/people/spr/codebubbles/ They have teamed up with Microsoft to develop a visual studio ultimate extension: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=DebuggerCanvasTeam.DebuggerCanvas. - Source: Hacker News / 9 days ago

You may be able to replace some of your curl+shell with Hurl — https://hurl.dev/#also-an-http-test-tool . - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

I am currently looking for a solution to run automated tests on a sql website generator I am working on ( https://sql.ophir.dev ) I wanted to use hurl (https://hurl.dev/), but Bruno's UI seems to be useful while developing the tests... Has someone tried both ? Which is better for automated testing, including when the response type is html and not json? - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

Shameless promotion: Hurl [1] is an Open Source cli using libcurl to run and tests HTTP requests with plain text! We use libcurl for the super reliability and top features (HTTP/3 for instance) and we've added little features like: - requests chaining, - capturing and passing data from a response to another request, - response tests (JSONPath, XPath, etc...) There is nice syntax sugar for resuesting... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

- This too will suffer the same fate as the previous two and will gradually also adopt a busy, unworkable, confusing UI This is why I’ve started using Hurl because that doesn’t even have a UI. Bonus: can be kept in source control and run as part of CI/CD. https://www.communication-generation.com/enshitification/ https://hurl.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

Testing our application is a matter of running npm run start:dev and making requests to it. To test it better I'll leave a Hurl file in the repository that you can use to test the API. You can run it using hurl --test ./collection.hurl. This will run all the tests and make sure that everything is working as expected. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago