StartupSubmit.app VS git-sizer

• Manual Directory Submission
  StartupSubmit manually submits your startup, SaaS product, or AI tool to relevant directories and software platforms. Each listing is handled by a real person rather than an automated submission bot.
• SEO & Backlink Growth
  Build a stronger online presence through relevant directory listings that can support SEO, referring domains, brand visibility, and Domain Rating over time.
• 200+ Directory Reach
  Get access to a broad network of startup, SaaS, AI, software, and business directories, including platforms such as Product Hunt, G2, Capterra, BetaList, Indie Hackers, and more.
• Done-for-You Submission
  Save hours of manual research and form filling. StartupSubmit handles the directory research, submissions, and listing details for you.
• Directory-Specific Listings
  Listings are tailored to each platform instead of relying on one generic description, helping maintain accurate and relevant information across directories.
• Submission Report
  Receive a detailed report showing the directories submitted, submission status, screenshots, and other campaign details for easy tracking.
• SaaS & AI Focused
  Built for SaaS founders, AI startups, software products, and technology businesses looking to expand their online visibility.
• AI Discoverability
  Consistent listings across relevant software and startup platforms can give search engines and AI systems more reliable information about your product and brand.

• Comprehensive Repository Analysis
  git-sizer analyzes many different dimensions of a Git repository including commit count, tree size, blob size, history depth, and reference counts, providing a holistic view of repository health and potential scaling issues.
• Easy to Use
  The tool is simple to run with minimal setup—just execute it within a git repository—and it produces clear, human-readable output that highlights potential problem areas without requiring complex configuration.
• Identifies Performance Bottlenecks
  It helps identify specific issues that could degrade Git performance, such as excessively large blobs, deep history, large trees, or too many references, which is valuable before migrating or scaling repositories.
• Open Source and Maintained by GitHub
  Being an official GitHub project, it benefits from credibility, community trust, and ongoing maintenance, and it is well documented with clear explanations of what each metric means.
• Useful for Pre-Migration Checks
  It's particularly helpful for teams migrating repositories to new platforms or consolidating repos, as it flags potential issues that could cause problems during migration or with hosting providers' limits.

Possible disadvantages

• No Automatic Remediation
  git-sizer only identifies and reports issues but does not offer any built-in tools or automated processes to fix problems like large blobs or excessive history depth—users must use separate tools like BFG Repo-Cleaner or git-filter-repo.
• Output Can Be Overwhelming for Beginners
  While detailed, the output includes many metrics and threshold levels that may be confusing for users unfamiliar with Git internals, requiring some learning curve to fully interpret results.
• Limited to Local Analysis
  The tool analyzes a local clone of the repository, so it requires users to have a full local copy of the repo (or at least enough history) to get accurate results, which can be time-consuming for very large repositories.
• No Real-Time Monitoring
  It functions as a one-time analysis tool rather than providing continuous or real-time monitoring of repository health, requiring manual reruns to track changes over time.
• Command-Line Only Interface
  The tool lacks a graphical user interface, which may be less accessible for users who prefer visual dashboards or are less comfortable with command-line tools.

Tracking StartupSubmit.app since Sep 2025.

• how to keep github repos small?

  Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago