Startup Buffer
Product Hunt
BetaList
StartupBase
Startup Stash
PitchWall
SaaSHub
AlternativeTo
Cppcheck
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
lgtm.com
SonarQube
VisualCodeGrepper
Flawfinder
Parasoft C/C++test
Startup Buffer is a premium startup directory that provides quality exposure to startups. It has a good amount of followers on social media and offers premium services. They also share various resources for startups to help them get better at startup marketing.
Startup Buffer CppcheckStartup Buffer is recommended for early-stage startups that are looking for cost-effective ways to increase visibility and reach a broader audience. It is particularly suited for startups without large marketing budgets or those that are just beginning to build their online presence. Additionally, entrepreneurs who value community feedback and networking may find it beneficial.
Cppcheck is recommended for C/C++ developers and development teams, particularly those responsible for maintaining large codebases or projects where code quality and reliability are paramount. It is also beneficial for educational purposes, where students and new developers can learn about potential pitfalls in C/C++ programming.
An alternative place to get some visitors to your site. I tried the paid listing feature and to be honest it worths the money, instead of waiting for months to get published.
Based on our record, Cppcheck should be more popular than Startup Buffer. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Startup Buffer - Broadening the audience for new startups. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Appreciate it if you could mention Startup Buffer. Keep up the good work! Source: about 4 years ago
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 3 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: over 3 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: over 3 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 3 years ago
Product Hunt - A website that lets users share and discover new products
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
BetaList - BetaList provides an overview of upcoming internet startups. Discover and get early access to the future.
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
StartupBase - Launch and discover new products every day ๐
lgtm.com - lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.