Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

stackprof VS Kcachegrind

Compare stackprof VS Kcachegrind and see what are their differences

stackprof

stackprof is a a sampling call-stack profiler for ruby 2.1+

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Kcachegrind

Callgrind is a profiling tool and KCachegrind is able to visualize output of the profilers.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Eddyter
Build and integrate a WYSIWYG editor in minutes. Eddyter offers fast setup, developer-friendly APIs, and seamless content editing for modern web apps today. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, stackprof seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 3 times since March 2021.

social mentions
3 vs 0
Software Development popularity
43% vs 57%
alternatives listed
15 vs 29

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

stackprof
Kcachegrind
Website github.com apps.kde.org
Listed in
Resource Profiling And Monitoring Software Development Memory Monitoring IDE +1
Resource Profiling And Monitoring Software Development IDE Memory Monitoring +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

stackprof 0 features
Kcachegrind 5 features

No features have been listed yet.

  • Comprehensive Visualization
    KCachegrind provides detailed graphical representations of profiling data, helping users to visualize where time is being spent in their applications.
  • Customizable Views
    Users can customize various views to focus on different aspects of the profiling data, making it easier to identify performance bottlenecks.
  • Call Graph Analysis
    It offers sophisticated call graph analysis, which allows users to see function call hierarchies and understand the call relationships in their applications.
  • Integration with Valgrind
    KCachegrind integrates well with Valgrind, which is a powerful tool for memory debugging and profiling on Linux systems.
  • Cross-platform Support
    Though primarily developed for Unix-like systems, it is also available on Windows, increasing its usability across different platforms.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complexity
    The tool can be complex to use for beginners, with a steep learning curve due to its wide array of features and visualization options.
  • Limited Non-Linux Support
    While available on other systems, the best integration and performance are on Linux, making it less suitable for non-Linux users.
  • Resource Intensive
    KCachegrind can be resource-intensive, potentially leading to performance issues when analyzing very large datasets or long profiling sessions.
  • Limited Real-time Profiling
    It primarily works with data collected from previous runs rather than real-time profiling, which might not suit all types of application analysis needs.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

stackprof
Kcachegrind

Overall verdict

  • StackProf is a well-regarded, sampling-based profiler for Ruby that provides low-overhead, actionable insights into CPU, wall-clock, object allocation, and memory usage, making it a reliable choice for performance analysis in production and development.

Why this product is good

  • Low-overhead sampling profiler that is safe to run in many scenarios, including production, without significantly impacting performance
  • Supports multiple profiling modes including CPU time, wall-clock time, and object allocation, giving flexibility for different diagnostic needs
  • Produces detailed reports with call graphs and flamegraph output that make it easy to identify hotspots and bottlenecks
  • Well-maintained, widely adopted in the Ruby community, and integrates cleanly with tools like rack-mini-profiler and speedscope
  • Simple API that lets you profile specific code blocks or entire applications with minimal setup

Recommended for

  • Ruby developers needing to diagnose CPU or performance bottlenecks in their applications
  • Teams optimizing Rails applications for latency and throughput
  • Engineers profiling memory allocation and garbage collection pressure
  • Developers who want to generate flamegraphs for visual performance analysis
  • Anyone needing a lightweight profiler suitable for production sampling

No analysis of Kcachegrind yet.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
stackprof
Kcachegrind
43% 43%
Software Development
57% 57%
43% 43%
Resource Profiling And Monitoring
57% 57%
46% 46%
IDE
54% 54%
50% 50%
Memory Monitoring
50% 50%

User comments

Share your experience with using stackprof and Kcachegrind. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

stackprof 3 mentions
Kcachegrind 0 mentions
  • A Trick For Reading Flamegraphs
    Stackprof can be used alone/by itself to generate flamegraphs for arbitrary Ruby code. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • Why do my requests take so much time to complete when View and ActiveRecord are finishing fast?
    I’d use something like stackprof ( https://github.com/tmm1/stackprof ) to see where the time is going. If you already have suspicions you can use it to get information about a specific method / few lines of Ruby but there’s also a rack... Source: over 4 years ago
  • Optimizing your tests in 5 steps
    Other profilers, such as stackprof, trace everything that’s happening by line. These types of profilers usually need some instrumentation to be configured, as shown below:. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

Tracking Kcachegrind since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to stackprof and Kcachegrind

When comparing stackprof and Kcachegrind, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...