Software Alternatives & Startups

Webgrind VS stackprof

Compare Webgrind VS stackprof and see what are their differences

Webgrind

Webgrind is an Xdebug profiling web frontend in PHP5.

Rating
0 reviews
stackprof

stackprof is a a sampling call-stack profiler for ruby 2.1+

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, stackprof should be more popular than Webgrind. It has been mentioned 3 times since March 2021.

social mentions
1 vs 3
Software Development popularity
46% vs 54%
alternatives listed
3 vs 15

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Webgrind
stackprof
Website github.com github.com
Listed in

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Webgrind
stackprof

No analysis of Webgrind yet.

Overall verdict

  • StackProf is a well-regarded, sampling-based profiler for Ruby that provides low-overhead, actionable insights into CPU, wall-clock, object allocation, and memory usage, making it a reliable choice for performance analysis in production and development.

Why this product is good

  • Low-overhead sampling profiler that is safe to run in many scenarios, including production, without significantly impacting performance
  • Supports multiple profiling modes including CPU time, wall-clock time, and object allocation, giving flexibility for different diagnostic needs
  • Produces detailed reports with call graphs and flamegraph output that make it easy to identify hotspots and bottlenecks
  • Well-maintained, widely adopted in the Ruby community, and integrates cleanly with tools like rack-mini-profiler and speedscope
  • Simple API that lets you profile specific code blocks or entire applications with minimal setup

Recommended for

  • Ruby developers needing to diagnose CPU or performance bottlenecks in their applications
  • Teams optimizing Rails applications for latency and throughput
  • Engineers profiling memory allocation and garbage collection pressure
  • Developers who want to generate flamegraphs for visual performance analysis
  • Anyone needing a lightweight profiler suitable for production sampling

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Webgrind 1 video + Add
stackprof 0 videos + Add

Drupal Quickstart 0.8: Profiling with XDebug and Webgrind

No stackprof videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Webgrind
stackprof
46% 46%
54% 54%
53% 53%
IDE
47% 47%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Webgrind and stackprof. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Webgrind 1 mention
stackprof 3 mentions
  • Weekly help thread
    Is there a way to read the xDebug 3 Profiler results on Windows? I've tried: 1) QCacheGrind?(https://sourceforge.net/projects/qcachegrindwin/) 2) WinCacheGrind (https://github.com/ceefour/wincachegrind/releases/tag/1.1) 3) Webgrind... Source: over 4 years ago
  • A Trick For Reading Flamegraphs
    Stackprof can be used alone/by itself to generate flamegraphs for arbitrary Ruby code. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • Why do my requests take so much time to complete when View and ActiveRecord are finishing fast?
    I’d use something like stackprof ( https://github.com/tmm1/stackprof ) to see where the time is going. If you already have suspicions you can use it to get information about a specific method / few lines of Ruby but there’s also a rack... Source: over 4 years ago
  • Optimizing your tests in 5 steps
    Other profilers, such as stackprof, trace everything that’s happening by line. These types of profilers usually need some instrumentation to be configured, as shown below:. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

Alternatives to Webgrind and stackprof

When comparing Webgrind and stackprof, you can also consider the following products.