Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Stack WM VS QuickTile

Compare Stack WM VS QuickTile and see what are their differences

Stack WM logo Stack WM

Better window manager for Windows

QuickTile logo QuickTile

A lightweight utility for allowing you to quickly snap windows to a tiling grid under your existing...
  • Stack WM Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-14
  • QuickTile Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-29

Stack WM features and specs

  • Resource Efficiency
    Stack WM is designed to be lightweight and efficient, consuming minimal system resources, which can lead to better performance on older or less powerful hardware.
  • Customizability
    The window manager offers significant customization options, allowing users to tailor the interface and functionality to their specific needs and preferences.
  • Tiling Features
    It provides automatic tiling of windows, which can improve workflow and multitasking by making better use of screen real estate.
  • Keyboard Shortcuts
    Offers a variety of configurable keyboard shortcuts to improve navigation speed and efficiency, reducing the reliance on a mouse.
  • Open-Source
    Being open-source, it allows developers to view, modify, and contribute to the codebase, fostering a community of collaborative improvement.

Possible disadvantages of Stack WM

  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users may find it difficult to learn and configure as it does not provide a standard desktop environment with typical graphical tools.
  • Limited Graphical Tools
    Unlike more mainstream desktop environments, Stack WM does not come with many built-in graphical configuration tools, which may necessitate manual configuration file editing.
  • Compatibility
    Some users might face compatibility issues with certain applications designed mainly for more popular environments, necessitating additional configuration or troubleshooting.
  • Niche User Base
    Being a less widely used window manager, it has a smaller community, which can mean fewer resources and support options are available online.
  • Potential Stability Issues
    As with many lightweight or less commonly used software solutions, users might encounter bugs or stability issues that have yet to be fully addressed.

QuickTile features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    QuickTile provides a straightforward approach to window tiling, allowing users to manage window layouts efficiently without complex configurations.
  • Customization
    It supports extensive customization, enabling users to define their own tiling layouts and shortcuts to suit their workflow needs.
  • Lightweight
    QuickTile is lightweight and doesn't consume significant system resources, making it suitable for older or less powerful machines.
  • Cross-Platform
    QuickTile is compatible with various Linux distributions, making it accessible to a wide range of Linux users.

Possible disadvantages of QuickTile

  • Linux Only
    QuickTile is designed for Linux systems, which means users on other operating systems like Windows or macOS cannot use it.
  • Limited Features
    Compared to full-fledged tiling window managers, QuickTile offers a more limited set of features focused solely on tiling.
  • Manual Configuration
    Some users may find the initial setup and configuration to be manual and time-consuming, especially if they want to tailor their shortcuts extensively.
  • No GUI
    QuickTile operates without a graphical user interface, which might not appeal to users who prefer visual configuration tools.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Stack WM and QuickTile)
Window Manager
41 41%
59% 59
OSX Tools
39 39%
61% 61
OS & Utilities
32 32%
68% 68
OSX Window Manager
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Stack WM and QuickTile. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Stack WM might be a bit more popular than QuickTile. We know about 5 links to it since March 2021 and only 4 links to QuickTile. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Stack WM mentions (5)

  • Show HN: A tiling window manager like i3wm written in C#
    What is the license? I am author of Stack WM [1]. Also C#, but all the configuration and layouts are defined in WPF XAML and are generally static (e.g. Like PowerToys, but much more flexible due to WPF containers and data binding + you can make WPF-based widgets). Curious about the license for I am interested in having a common library for window manipulation. I am using VirtualDesktop [2] to handle Windows... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
  • A terminal with UI like visual code
    > I could envision a WM that allows you to group windows together into tabs There's one on Windows, that has the tabs feature: https://losttech.software/stack.html Disclaimer: I made it. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
  • KDE: A Nice Tiling Environment and a Surprisingly DE
    Disclaimer: I am the author. For Windows I made Stack WM: https://losttech.software/stack.html I works differently from i3: you _predefine_ screen zones (possibly overlapping), and then just move your windows between them with keyboard shortcuts or middle mouse button. IMHO, covers the problems you mentioned. You can have: - multiple windows in one zone with normal Z ordering - a taskbar for any zone or a group of... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
  • Switching to the I3 Window Manager
    I've made my own tiling WM for Windows (non-free): https://losttech.software/stack.html But it does not work like i3. You predefine the layouts (which can be dynamic). - Source: Hacker News / almost 5 years ago
  • Ask HN: What are some tools / libraries you built yourself?
    A tiling window manager for Windows https://losttech.software/stack.html. - Source: Hacker News / about 5 years ago

QuickTile mentions (4)

  • My (challenging) experience building a window switcher for Ubuntu
    As the author of QuickTile, which is written in Python but even closer to what you describe than a window manager would be, I have to say that, yeah, doing X11 stuff takes a lot of knowledge that's not ideally documented in non-print sources. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Rust's problematic reliance on GitHub
    Actually, I plan to add a .nojekyll file and then use something like Pelican with custom plugins, then set GitHub Actions to run my update.sh on push... Similar to how http://ssokolow.com/quicktile/ is a Sphinx-based site hosted on GitHub Pages and automatically regenerated from the pushed sources. Source: about 4 years ago
  • tilling wm on elementary os ?
    I've been using ssokolow.com/quicktile for this purpose, it does what I need and doesn't replace the wm. Source: over 4 years ago
  • Converting an array, slice or vector to base58 encoding WITH check
    The best I could do for the API documentation for this project of mine was to use the automodule directive to autogenerate at the coarsest level possible and remember to never create new .py files if I could possibly avoid it. Source: almost 5 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Stack WM and QuickTile, you can also consider the following products

GridMove - GridMove - A window management tool that can quickly arrange your windows into desktop grids.

Preme for Windows - Speeds up your window switching.

WinDock - WinDock is a window manager ideal for large, or multi-monitor setups. Features:

TaskSpace - boost up your productivity using our software

WindowSpace - WindowSpace is a powerful desktop enhancement utility for large monitors, widescreens and...

FreeSnap - Ever try to size a window so it just touches the edge of the screen? Itโ€™s tedious (at least for me).