FreeSnap VS Stack WM

FreeSnap

Ever try to size a window so it just touches the edge of the screen? It’s tedious (at least for me).

Stack WM

Better window manager for Windows

Landing page //
2018-12-17

Landing page //
2021-10-14

FreeSnap

Website: mike-ward.net
$ Details: -

Edit details

Stack WM

Website: losttech.software
$ Details

Edit details

FreeSnap features and specs

Ease of Use
FreeSnap simplifies window management, allowing users to quickly snap windows to different parts of the screen without complex configuration.
Productivity Boost
Enhances productivity by enabling efficient multitasking through better organization of open windows.
Lightweight
The application is lightweight and does not consume significant system resources, ensuring smooth performance even on older machines.
Freeware
Available for free, making it accessible to all users without any cost barriers.

Possible disadvantages of FreeSnap

Limited Features
Compared to other window management tools, FreeSnap offers a basic set of features and lacks advanced functionalities.
Windows Only
The application is restricted to Windows operating systems, not supporting other platforms like macOS or Linux.
Single Monitor Focus
Optimized for single monitor setups, FreeSnap may not provide the best experience for users with multi-monitor configurations.
Legacy Interface
The interface may appear outdated to users accustomed to modern UI designs, potentially impacting the overall user experience.

Stack WM features and specs

Resource Efficiency
Stack WM is designed to be lightweight and efficient, consuming minimal system resources, which can lead to better performance on older or less powerful hardware.
Customizability
The window manager offers significant customization options, allowing users to tailor the interface and functionality to their specific needs and preferences.
Tiling Features
It provides automatic tiling of windows, which can improve workflow and multitasking by making better use of screen real estate.
Keyboard Shortcuts
Offers a variety of configurable keyboard shortcuts to improve navigation speed and efficiency, reducing the reliance on a mouse.
Open-Source
Being open-source, it allows developers to view, modify, and contribute to the codebase, fostering a community of collaborative improvement.

Possible disadvantages of Stack WM

Steep Learning Curve
New users may find it difficult to learn and configure as it does not provide a standard desktop environment with typical graphical tools.
Limited Graphical Tools
Unlike more mainstream desktop environments, Stack WM does not come with many built-in graphical configuration tools, which may necessitate manual configuration file editing.
Compatibility
Some users might face compatibility issues with certain applications designed mainly for more popular environments, necessitating additional configuration or troubleshooting.
Niche User Base
Being a less widely used window manager, it has a smaller community, which can mean fewer resources and support options are available online.
Potential Stability Issues
As with many lightweight or less commonly used software solutions, users might encounter bugs or stability issues that have yet to be fully addressed.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to FreeSnap and Stack WM)

Stack WM

Window Manager

56 56%

Window Manager

44% 44

OSX Tools

61 61%

OSX Tools

39% 39

OS & Utilities

66 66%

OS & Utilities

34% 34

OSX Window Manager

61 61%

OSX Window Manager

39% 39

User comments

Share your experience with using FreeSnap and Stack WM. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Stack WM should be more popular than FreeSnap. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

FreeSnap mentions (1)

Vivaldi picture in picture player stuck in unclickable area
You can try using utilities such as DualMonitorTools or FreeSnap to move windows around. Source: almost 3 years ago

Stack WM mentions (5)

Show HN: A tiling window manager like i3wm written in C#
What is the license? I am author of Stack WM [1]. Also C#, but all the configuration and layouts are defined in WPF XAML and are generally static (e.g. Like PowerToys, but much more flexible due to WPF containers and data binding + you can make WPF-based widgets). Curious about the license for I am interested in having a common library for window manipulation. I am using VirtualDesktop [2] to handle Windows... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
A terminal with UI like visual code
> I could envision a WM that allows you to group windows together into tabs There's one on Windows, that has the tabs feature: https://losttech.software/stack.html Disclaimer: I made it. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
KDE: A Nice Tiling Environment and a Surprisingly DE
Disclaimer: I am the author. For Windows I made Stack WM: https://losttech.software/stack.html I works differently from i3: you _predefine_ screen zones (possibly overlapping), and then just move your windows between them with keyboard shortcuts or middle mouse button. IMHO, covers the problems you mentioned. You can have: - multiple windows in one zone with normal Z ordering - a taskbar for any zone or a group of... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Switching to the I3 Window Manager
I've made my own tiling WM for Windows (non-free): https://losttech.software/stack.html But it does not work like i3. You predefine the layouts (which can be dynamic). - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Ask HN: What are some tools / libraries you built yourself?
A tiling window manager for Windows https://losttech.software/stack.html. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago