Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

sshuttle VS Firezone

Compare sshuttle VS Firezone and see what are their differences

sshuttle

sshuttle: where transparent proxy meets VPN meets ssh

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
Firezone

Firezone is a remote access platform that’s painless to deploy, easy to manage, and built on WireGuard® to be blazing fast. Best of all it's self-hosted and open-source.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source Freemium Free trial
Alternatives Is it good?
CGPulse
Scan Azure and AWS resources against 621 policy rules. Auto-remediate findings, track compliance frameworks, integrate via API. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, sshuttle seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 29 times since March 2021.

social mentions
29 vs 0
VPN popularity
81% vs 19%
alternatives listed
173 vs 61

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

sshuttle
Firezone
Website github.com firezone.dev
Pricing
Open source
Open source Freemium Free trial Official pricing
Platforms —
Windows Linux Mac OSX iOS +1
Company — 2021
Listed in
VPN Security Cloud VPN SSH +1
VPN Cloud VPN Security Security & Privacy +1

About sshuttle and Firezone

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

sshuttle
Firezone

No description of sshuttle yet.

Use Firezone to manage secure remote access to applications in your private cloud, funnel traffic through a single egress gateway for your team, establish a reverse tunnel to a host behind NAT, or simply ensure that the first hop from your teams' laptops is encrypted when connecting from...

Read more about Firezone

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

sshuttle 5 features
Firezone 4 features
  • Simplicity
    sshuttle is easy to set up and use, requiring minimal configuration. It leverages SSH, a tool that many are already familiar with.
  • No Root Access Required
    sshuttle can be used without root access on the client side, making it accessible in environments where administrative privileges are restricted.
  • Cross-Platform
    sshuttle works on multiple operating systems including Linux and macOS, providing flexibility in different environments.
  • Compatibility
    As it operates at the IP level, sshuttle can work with any program and command-line tools that interact over TCP/IP without requiring any changes.
  • Security
    Utilizes SSH's encryption mechanisms, ensuring data is securely tunneled between the client and the server.

Possible disadvantages

  • Performance
    While convenient, sshuttle may not perform as well as more specialized VPN solutions, especially under heavy network load.
  • Limited Features
    Compared to dedicated VPN software, sshuttle lacks advanced features such as traffic shaping, advanced logging, and fine-grained access controls.
  • No UDP Support
    sshuttle primarily supports TCP, and has limited support for UDP, which may be a drawback for applications that rely heavily on UDP.
  • Dependency on SSH Servers
    Requires a functional SSH server at the remote end, which may not always be feasible or permitted in all network configurations.
  • Complex Networks
    Handling complex network environments may get tricky. More sophisticated routing configurations or VPN setups can better manage such cases.
  • Users
    Unlimited
  • Devices
    Unlimited
  • Split Tunnel
  • WireGuard

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

sshuttle
Firezone

Overall verdict

  • sshuttle is generally considered a good and reliable tool for securely tunneling traffic. It is suitable for users who need an easy way to bypass firewalls and access remote networks securely without the complexity of traditional VPNs.

Why this product is good

  • sshuttle is a popular tool because it combines the simplicity of SSH tunneling with the transparency of a VPN, allowing users to forward traffic easily over an SSH connection. It is particularly appreciated for its ability to overcome restrictive firewalls and provide secure access to resources without needing root privileges (on the client side) or requiring a VPN setup on the server.

Recommended for

  • Developers and system administrators who need to access office or remote networks securely.
  • Users who need to bypass firewalls or restrictive network conditions.
  • People seeking a simpler alternative to VPNs, especially when working with SSH-accessible servers.
  • Individuals who require a temporary or lightweight solution for secure network access.

No analysis of Firezone yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

sshuttle 3 videos + Add
Firezone 1 video + Add

Hak5 1224.1, SShuttle and Linux Talk

More videos

  • - Hak5 1224.2, SShuttle and Linux Talk
  • - Hak5 1224.3, SShuttle and Linux Talk

Deploy Firezone on AWS

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
sshuttle
Firezone
81% 81%
VPN
19% 19%
79% 79%
Security & Privacy
21% 21%
100% 100%
Tool
0% 0%
66% 66%
Cloud VPN
34% 34%

User comments

Share your experience with using sshuttle and Firezone. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

sshuttle 29 mentions
Firezone 0 mentions

View more

Tracking Firezone since Jun 2022.

Alternatives to sshuttle and Firezone

When comparing sshuttle and Firezone, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...