
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Squoosh seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 202 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | squoosh.app | makerstage.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | — | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Squoosh yet.
MakerStage is an on-demand manufacturing platform that connects hardware teams with precision CNC machining, 3D printing, and sheet metal fabrication — delivered in days, not weeks. We exist to remove the friction from custom part procurement. Upload your CAD file, get a quote in hours, and...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Web developers, designers, bloggers, and anyone needing to optimize images for the web, particularly those concerned about maintaining image quality while reducing file size.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Jumbo Squoosh-o’s Review! #SLIMESTAGRAM #JumboSquooshos
More videos
No MakerStage videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Squoosh and MakerStage.
MakerStage's answer:
MakerStage makes custom manufacturing simpler by combining fast quoting, hands-on support, and vetted manufacturing partners across Asia and the U.S.
MakerStage's answer:
MakerStage offers a simpler, more reliable way to source custom parts with fast quoting, hands-on support, and vetted manufacturing partners across Asia and the U.S.
MakerStage's answer:
Engineers, procurement teams, and hardware startups sourcing CNC, 3D printed, and sheet metal parts.
Share your experience with using Squoosh and MakerStage. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


The only negative thing about this web app, is that it's not clear which formats are supported in which browsers.
We have no reviews of MakerStage yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


WebP/AVIF over PNG/JPG: Converted all icons to WebP (using Squoosh) – average size reduction of ~60% (e.g., a 40KB PNG icon became 15KB WebP). - Source: dev.to / 4 days ago
It often comes down to compat, and developer requests. Personally I find in-browser encoding for images inadequate, because it doesn't expose enough options. When we built https://squoosh.app/, we exposed the browser encoders for... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
Its a fun challenge. I used https://squoosh.app to make a pretty good one. Mostly just a resize and then OxiPNG for compression. Managed a 124x62 black/white image. OP has a resolution of 195x53, so I had very similar, but slightly worse... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Tracking MakerStage since Apr 2026.
When comparing Squoosh and MakerStage, you can also consider the following products.

Make your website faster and save bandwidth. TinyPNG optimizes your PNG images by 50-80% while preserving full transparency!
Compare TinyPNG to Squoosh or MakerStage:


iLoveIMG is one of most powerful solution that comes with all the major tool you cloud want to edit images in bulk.
Compare iLoveIMG to Squoosh or MakerStage:

Compress your pictures up to 90% without visible quality loss.
Compare Caesium Image Compressor to Squoosh or MakerStage:

convert anything to anything - more than 200 different audio, video, document, ebook, archive, image, spreadsheet and presentation formats supported.
Compare CloudConvert to Squoosh or MakerStage:
