Splitwise VS CryptaCount

CryptaCount's answer:

CryptaCount is a crypto sub-ledger, not a portfolio tracker with an export button. It turns raw blockchain data into audit-ready financial statements, with a complete three-layer audit trail running from the original on-chain event through to the posted journal entry. Every figure can be traced back to the transaction that produced it.

It is built to the standards accountants actually report under: IFRS and US GAAP financial statements, FASB ASC 350-60 fair value accounting, and 8 cost basis methods including FIFO, LIFO, HIFO, LOFO, Weighted Average, Specific ID and ACB. Methods can be switched at any time and the ledger replays from genesis, so a change in policy does not mean rebuilding history by hand.

It is also built for the regulation that is arriving rather than the regulation that has passed: MiCA, CARF, DAC8 and VARA reporting are supported out of the box. Coverage spans 90 blockchain networks - EVM and non-EVM, including Aptos, Cosmos, Cardano, Tron, TON and Sui — and it posts straight into QuickBooks, Xero, Zoho Books, Sage and NetSuite, so crypto stops being the one ledger that sits outside the accounting stack.

It was founded by an ACCA-qualified accountant, which is why the product starts from the audit requirement and works backwards, rather than starting from the blockchain data and hoping it is enough.

CryptaCount's answer:

Because most crypto tools produce numbers. CryptaCount produces numbers an auditor will accept.

Audit defensibility is the core of the product. The three-layer audit trail links every blockchain event to its classification and to the resulting journal entry, with immutable records throughout. When an auditor asks how a figure was derived, the working is already there rather than reconstructed after the fact.

Real accounting standards, not approximations. IFRS and US GAAP statements, FASB ASC 350-60 fair value treatment, real-time NAV and portfolio valuation, and 8 cost basis methods you can switch between with a full replay from genesis.

Regulatory coverage ahead of the curve. MiCA, CARF, DAC8 and VARA are supported now, not on a roadmap. For firms and funds in the EU and UAE, that is the difference between being ready and scrambling.

It fits the stack you already run. Native integrations with QuickBooks, Xero, Zoho Books, Sage and NetSuite mean crypto flows into the same close process as everything else, instead of living in a spreadsheet.

Breadth of data. 90 blockchain networks covering both EVM and non-EVM chains, plus major exchange integrations, with a rule engine that auto-classifies staking rewards, DeFi yields, gas fees, transfers and swaps.

And it is built by an accountant. The founder is ACCA qualified, so the design question was always "will this survive an audit", not "does this look good on a dashboard".

CryptaCount's answer:

CryptaCount is built for professionals who have to answer for the numbers.

Accounting firms and practices managing crypto clients, who need a sub-ledger that produces defensible statements at scale rather than a spreadsheet per client.

Auditors, who need a complete, immutable trail from blockchain event to journal entry in order to sign off.

Crypto funds and institutional treasuries, who need real-time NAV, portfolio valuation, treasury and cash-flow analysis, and IFRS or US GAAP reporting.

Web3 companies and node operators, who hold and earn crypto operationally and need it to close properly alongside the rest of the business.

Geographically it skews toward jurisdictions where crypto reporting obligations are already binding — the EU under MiCA, DAC8 and CARF, the UAE under VARA, and the US under FASB.

Individual investors filing personal crypto taxes are served by our sister product, CryptaTax, rather than CryptaCount.

CryptaCount's answer:

CryptaCount was founded by an ACCA-qualified accountant, and that is the whole origin of the product. Coming from practice rather than from trading, the problem looked different: the market was full of tools that could tell you what your crypto was worth, and almost none that could produce something an auditor would sign.

Crypto had become a real balance-sheet item — treasuries, funds, node operators, Web3 payrolls — but it was still being closed in spreadsheets, outside the accounting system, with no traceable link between an on-chain event and the journal entry it eventually became. That is fine until someone asks you to prove it.

So we built the missing layer: a crypto sub-ledger that ingests 90 blockchain networks, classifies transactions automatically, applies a proper cost basis method, and posts audit-ready entries straight into QuickBooks, Xero, Zoho Books, Sage or NetSuite — with a three-layer audit trail behind every number.

The timing was not accidental. FASB fair value rules, MiCA, DAC8 and CARF all land in roughly the same window, and they all assume a standard of record-keeping that most crypto holders do not currently have. CryptaCount exists to close that gap. Today it is used by 1,000+ businesses, and it sits alongside CryptaTax, our personal filing product, under CryptaCount, Inc.

CryptaCount's answer:

• Google Cloud Platform infrastructure
• JasperReports for financial reporting and custom report templates
• SOC 2 compliant architecture with per-workspace data isolation and role-based access control
• Direct blockchain node/indexing across 90 networks (EVM and non-EVM: Ethereum, Bitcoin, Solana, Cosmos, Aptos, Cardano, Tron, TON, Sui)
• Read-only exchange API integrations (Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, OKX, Bybit, KuCoin, Crypto.com, Gate.io)
• Accounting system APIs: QuickBooks, Xero, Zoho Books, Sage, NetSuite

CryptaCount's answer:

• Accounting firms and practices managing crypto clients
• Crypto funds and institutional treasuries
• Web3 companies and node operators
• Auditors requiring full transaction-to-journal audit trails