Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Spliit VS socketify.py

Compare Spliit VS socketify.py and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Spliit logo Spliit

Free and Open Source Alternative to Splitwise. Share expenses with your friends and family.

socketify.py logo socketify.py

Maybe the fastest web framework for Python and PyPy
  • Spliit Home Page
    Home Page //
    2024-02-09
  • Spliit Expenses
    Expenses //
    2024-02-09
  • Spliit Balances & Suggested Reimbursements
    Balances & Suggested Reimbursements //
    2024-02-09
  • Spliit Receipt Scanning
    Receipt Scanning //
    2024-02-09

Use Spliit to track your expenses with your roommates, travel friends, or family.

  • Create expenses faster than ever by scanning the receipt
  • Assign categories to your expenses
  • See optimize reimbursement suggestions to avoid too many transfers

Spliit is totally free and without any ads. It is open source, meaning you can contribute by reporting issues, suggesting features, or even implement them!

  • socketify.py Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-24

Spliit

Website
spliit.app
$ Details
free
Platforms
ReactJS TypeScript
Release Date
2022 July

socketify.py

Website
github.com
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

Spliit features and specs

  • Expenses
  • Categories
  • Receipt Scanning
  • Balances
  • Suggested Reimbursements
  • Ad-free

socketify.py features and specs

  • High Performance
    Socketify.py is designed for high scalability and performance, leveraging an efficient event loop and native extensions to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently.
  • WebSocket Support
    The library provides built-in support for WebSockets, making it suitable for real-time applications where persistent connections between client and server are necessary.
  • Asynchronous I/O
    Socketify.py is built on top of asynchronous I/O paradigms, allowing non-blocking operations that can improve the throughput of networked applications.
  • Ease of Use
    The library offers a clean and straightforward API with examples and documentation, which lowers the barrier to entry for developers who are new to network programming in Python.
  • Python Integration
    Being a Python library, socketify.py integrates well with existing Python applications and can be included as part of larger, multi-component systems.

Possible disadvantages of socketify.py

  • Limited Adoption
    As a relatively new or niche library, socketify.py might have a smaller user base and community compared to more established frameworks like Flask or Django, which could result in fewer community resources and third-party integrations.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers who are accustomed to synchronous programming paradigms, adapting to the asynchronous programming model of socketify.py may require an initial learning investment.
  • Documentation Depth
    While there is documentation, it might not be as extensive or comprehensive as those of more mature libraries, potentially requiring more experimentation or source code reading to fully grasp advanced features.
  • Potential Stability Issues
    Being less established, there might be undiscovered bugs or stability issues in production environments compared to long-standing Python networking libraries.
  • Ecosystem Limitations
    The library might lack some of the extensive third-party plugins or tools available in more popular frameworks, which could limit its extensibility.

Analysis of socketify.py

Overall verdict

  • Socketify.py is a solid choice for developers seeking a high-performance web framework in Python, particularly for I/O-bound applications requiring speed comparable to frameworks in compiled languages, thanks to its use of uWebSockets under the hood.

Why this product is good

  • Built on uWebSockets, providing significant performance improvements over traditional Python web frameworks
  • Supports WebSockets natively, making it suitable for real-time applications
  • Lightweight and minimalistic design reduces overhead
  • Compatible with ASGI, allowing integration with existing Python async ecosystem
  • Active development and growing community support on GitHub
  • Good for building high-throughput APIs and services

Recommended for

  • Developers building real-time applications like chat apps or live notifications
  • Projects requiring high concurrency and low latency in Python
  • Teams looking to replace slower WSGI-based frameworks with something faster
  • Applications needing WebSocket support without heavy framework overhead
  • Microservices architectures where performance is critical
  • Python developers wanting an alternative to Node.js for performance-sensitive tasks

Spliit videos

DSC Spliit โ€” Cricket Bat Review 2022/2023

socketify.py videos

No socketify.py videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Spliit and socketify.py)
Personal Finance
100 100%
0% 0
Websocket
0 0%
100% 100
Expense Tracking
100 100%
0% 0
Python
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Spliit and socketify.py. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, socketify.py seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Spliit mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Spliit yet. Tracking of Spliit recommendations started around Feb 2024.

socketify.py mentions (2)

  • Show HN: Python framework is faster than Golang Fiber
    These "benchmarks" are useless, they're not testing anything real world except the performance of uWebsockets. There are copy errors all over the place. And then an advertisement: https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py#briefcase-comme... Is this a professional framework that produces proper, real-world benchmarks and... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • This is how I started the development of the fastest ASGI and WSGI Server in TechEmPower Benchmarks
    After starting the project called socketify.py at https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py, I got pretty good results and reviews, but many people asked if socketify.py could be used to create a WSGI and ASGI server. WSGI and ASGI have a lot of overhead, that's is why I choose not to use them in the first place, but adding an ASGI and WSGI server allows a lot of code already written to run faster! Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Spliit and socketify.py, you can also consider the following products

Splitwise - Splitwise is a free tool for friends and roommates to track bills and other shared expenses, so that everyone gets paid back. On the web, iPhone, and Android!

Tricount - Manage and share expenses with friends

Splid - Splid helps friends manage their money.

Settle Up - SETTLE UP is an indispensable app for friends and flatmates who need to keep track of shared bills...

Kittysplit - The easiest way of sharing costs with a group of friends

Splitser - Splitser is the app for tracking, calculating and settling group expenses. โœ“ Payment App โœ“ Group Expenses โœ“ Spend app