Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Splid VS socketify.py

Compare Splid VS socketify.py and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Splid logo Splid

Splid helps friends manage their money.

socketify.py logo socketify.py

Maybe the fastest web framework for Python and PyPy
  • Splid Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30
  • socketify.py Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-24

Splid features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Splid offers an intuitive and easy-to-use interface that makes it simple for users to split expenses without any confusion.
  • Offline Functionality
    Users can log expenses and use the app even without an internet connection, which is useful in remote areas.
  • Multiple Currency Support
    Splid allows users to add expenses in different currencies, making it convenient for international travel and expenses.
  • No Sign-Up Required
    The app does not require users to create an account, simplifying access and reducing privacy concerns.
  • Easy Sharing
    Users can easily share expense reports with group members via a link, simplifying communication and transparency.

Possible disadvantages of Splid

  • Limited Integration
    Splid lacks integration with other financial apps or services, which can limit its functionality for some users.
  • Manual Expense Entry
    All expenses must be entered manually, which can be time-consuming compared to apps that offer receipt scanning.
  • No Real-Time Sync
    Changes are not updated in real-time across devices, potentially leading to discrepancies if multiple users are managing a list.
  • Basic Features Free
    While the basic app is free, advanced features require a paid upgrade, which might not be ideal for all users.
  • Limited to Group Expense
    Splid is focused on group expense sharing, lacking features for individual finance management or budgeting.

socketify.py features and specs

  • High Performance
    Socketify.py is designed for high scalability and performance, leveraging an efficient event loop and native extensions to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently.
  • WebSocket Support
    The library provides built-in support for WebSockets, making it suitable for real-time applications where persistent connections between client and server are necessary.
  • Asynchronous I/O
    Socketify.py is built on top of asynchronous I/O paradigms, allowing non-blocking operations that can improve the throughput of networked applications.
  • Ease of Use
    The library offers a clean and straightforward API with examples and documentation, which lowers the barrier to entry for developers who are new to network programming in Python.
  • Python Integration
    Being a Python library, socketify.py integrates well with existing Python applications and can be included as part of larger, multi-component systems.

Possible disadvantages of socketify.py

  • Limited Adoption
    As a relatively new or niche library, socketify.py might have a smaller user base and community compared to more established frameworks like Flask or Django, which could result in fewer community resources and third-party integrations.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers who are accustomed to synchronous programming paradigms, adapting to the asynchronous programming model of socketify.py may require an initial learning investment.
  • Documentation Depth
    While there is documentation, it might not be as extensive or comprehensive as those of more mature libraries, potentially requiring more experimentation or source code reading to fully grasp advanced features.
  • Potential Stability Issues
    Being less established, there might be undiscovered bugs or stability issues in production environments compared to long-standing Python networking libraries.
  • Ecosystem Limitations
    The library might lack some of the extensive third-party plugins or tools available in more popular frameworks, which could limit its extensibility.

Analysis of socketify.py

Overall verdict

  • Socketify.py is a solid choice for developers seeking a high-performance web framework in Python, particularly for I/O-bound applications requiring speed comparable to frameworks in compiled languages, thanks to its use of uWebSockets under the hood.

Why this product is good

  • Built on uWebSockets, providing significant performance improvements over traditional Python web frameworks
  • Supports WebSockets natively, making it suitable for real-time applications
  • Lightweight and minimalistic design reduces overhead
  • Compatible with ASGI, allowing integration with existing Python async ecosystem
  • Active development and growing community support on GitHub
  • Good for building high-throughput APIs and services

Recommended for

  • Developers building real-time applications like chat apps or live notifications
  • Projects requiring high concurrency and low latency in Python
  • Teams looking to replace slower WSGI-based frameworks with something faster
  • Applications needing WebSocket support without heavy framework overhead
  • Microservices architectures where performance is critical
  • Python developers wanting an alternative to Node.js for performance-sensitive tasks

Splid videos

"Splid" by Kvelertak (ALBUM OF THE YEAR CONTENDER?) | ALBUM REVIEW

More videos:

  • Review - Album Review/Reaction: Kvelertak - Splid
  • Review - Kvelertak: Splid -- ๐Ÿ’ฟ album review ๐Ÿ’ฟ

socketify.py videos

No socketify.py videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Splid and socketify.py)
Personal Finance
100 100%
0% 0
Python
0 0%
100% 100
Expense Tracking
100 100%
0% 0
Web Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Splid and socketify.py. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Splid and socketify.py

Splid Reviews

  1. dee parkes
    ยท retired at retired ยท
    great! easy to use, versatile, flexible. Recommended.

    I prefer this app to similar ones I've tried. It seems clearer, more straightforward and simpler to use for normal holidays etc. But if you need more complex arrangements it's versatile too: in that you can have multiple currencies; and groups containing different people.


12 Best Bill Splitting Apps in 2023
Splid is an excellent app for those who want to take their bill splitting to the next level. It is among the popular bill splitting apps that supports advanced features like location-based payment suggestions, detailed accounts of shared expenses, and a user-friendly interface, Splid app makes splitting bills easier than ever before.
Best Bill-Splitting Apps
Splitting up the cost of group trips can be tough. Splid allows you to add in all the expenses of a trip and then split it up among each person on the trip. The app is useful for splitting up non-trip expenses as well. Multiple payees can be added to each expense, for example, if two people covered the cost of groceries upfront, but five people need to chip in on the bill....

socketify.py Reviews

We have no reviews of socketify.py yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

socketify.py might be a bit more popular than Splid. We know about 2 links to it since March 2021 and only 2 links to Splid. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Splid mentions (2)

  • Running an Open Source App: Usage, Costs and Community Donations
    Would be interesting to see how this compares to https://splid.app/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Show HN: An alternative to Splitwise, more minimalist, no ads, no account
    Https://splid.app/ is a great no-account alternative. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

socketify.py mentions (2)

  • Show HN: Python framework is faster than Golang Fiber
    These "benchmarks" are useless, they're not testing anything real world except the performance of uWebsockets. There are copy errors all over the place. And then an advertisement: https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py#briefcase-comme... Is this a professional framework that produces proper, real-world benchmarks and... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • This is how I started the development of the fastest ASGI and WSGI Server in TechEmPower Benchmarks
    After starting the project called socketify.py at https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py, I got pretty good results and reviews, but many people asked if socketify.py could be used to create a WSGI and ASGI server. WSGI and ASGI have a lot of overhead, that's is why I choose not to use them in the first place, but adding an ASGI and WSGI server allows a lot of code already written to run faster! Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Splid and socketify.py, you can also consider the following products

Splitwise - Splitwise is a free tool for friends and roommates to track bills and other shared expenses, so that everyone gets paid back. On the web, iPhone, and Android!

Tricount - Manage and share expenses with friends

Settle Up - SETTLE UP is an indispensable app for friends and flatmates who need to keep track of shared bills...

Spliit - Free and Open Source Alternative to Splitwise. Share expenses with your friends and family.

Kittysplit - The easiest way of sharing costs with a group of friends

ihatemoney - Manage your shared expenses, easily