
GitHub
GitLab
BitBucket
openDesktop.org
Gitea
Launchpad.net
OSOR
The Complete Open-Source and Business Software Platform.

GitHub
figshare
arXiv
Substack
Creative Commons
Medium
Google Scholar
Open Science Framework provides project management with collaborators, and project sharing with the public.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Open Science Framework seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 38 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | sourceforge.net | osf.io |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of Open Science Framework yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Presearch Privacy Review #27 - Sourceforge
More videos
What is the Open Science Framework all about?
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using SourceForge and Open Science Framework. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


SourceForge is a great place for people who like open-source software. It offers a strong platform where you can find, review, and handle software, all while helping the open-source community.
SourceForge’s user interface works fine, but it could do with a modern overhaul to make it easier on the eye and give it a more intuitive feel. While it has a large community, SourceForge’s support is not as extensive...
Sourceforge has been around longer than most, and it has the projects to prove it. Lots of open source Linux, Windows and Mac projects are hosted on SF. It has a totally different project structure when compared with...
We have no reviews of Open Science Framework yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking SourceForge since Mar 2021.
Last night I happened to listen to an episode[1] on EconTalk where the author of the post (Adam Mastroianni, a psychologist) was a guest. Definitely worth a listen. Adam also supports "open science framework" (https://osf.io/) and... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Here are a few options to consider. First, Google Scholar. If you're logged into Google it will make a handful of recommendations on its front page. I've not really paid attention to how good the recommendations are. It says they're... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
It's customary to use OSF (https://osf.io/) on papers this "groundbreaking," as it encourages scientists to validate and replicate the work. It's also weird that at this stage there are not validation checks in place, exactly like those... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
When comparing SourceForge and Open Science Framework, you can also consider the following products.

Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.
Compare GitHub to SourceForge or Open Science Framework:

Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
Compare GitLab to SourceForge or Open Science Framework:

Securely store and manage your research outputs in the cloud, or make them openly available and citable.
Compare figshare to SourceForge or Open Science Framework:

Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.
Compare BitBucket to SourceForge or Open Science Framework:

arXiv is a free distribution service and an open-access archive for scholarly articles.
Compare arXiv to SourceForge or Open Science Framework:

The website openDesktop.
Compare openDesktop.org to SourceForge or Open Science Framework: