Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Sound Control VS Parse-Server

Compare Sound Control VS Parse-Server and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Sound Control logo Sound Control

App-specific volume control

Parse-Server logo Parse-Server

parse-server. Parse-compatible API server module for Node/Express. JS, 14271, 3819. parse-server-conformance-tests. Conformance tests for parse-server adapters.
  • Sound Control Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-02
  • Parse-Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-14

Sound Control features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    Sound Control features an intuitive and easy-to-use interface, making it accessible for both beginners and experienced users to manage audio settings.
  • Application-specific Volume Control
    Users can adjust the volume for individual applications, providing more precise control over the audio experience.
  • Audio Equalizer
    Includes a built-in audio equalizer allowing users to fine-tune sound frequencies to better fit their listening preferences.
  • Menu Bar Access
    Sound Control is conveniently accessible from the macOS menu bar, enabling quick and easy adjustments without navigating complex menus.
  • Global Hotkeys
    The software supports global hotkeys, allowing users to adjust volume and other settings without leaving their current application.

Possible disadvantages of Sound Control

  • Platform Limitation
    Sound Control is only available for macOS, excluding Windows and Linux users from utilizing its features.
  • Paid Software
    The application is not free and requires a purchase, which might be a drawback for those looking for cost-free alternatives.
  • Resource Usage
    Running Sound Control might consume additional system resources, potentially affecting performance on lower-end machines.
  • Updates and Support
    Users may encounter delays in receiving updates and support, depending on the developerโ€™s release schedule and responsiveness.

Parse-Server features and specs

  • Open Source
    Parse-Server is open-source, which means it's free to use and you can modify the source code to fit your specific needs. It also benefits from community contributions and improvements.
  • Backend as a Service
    It provides a backend as a service (BaaS), offering out-of-the-box features like data storage, user authentication, and push notifications, which allows developers to focus more on the frontend.
  • Cloud Independence
    You can deploy Parse-Server on any cloud service of your choice, giving you flexibility and control over your server environment, unlike other closed BaaS options.
  • Rich Feature Set
    Parse-Server includes a rich set of features such as live queries, GraphQL support, and file storage, which helps in developing complex applications efficiently.
  • Community Support
    An active community supports Parse-Server, providing regular updates, plugins, and extensions that can help solve common issues and expand the server's capabilities.

Possible disadvantages of Parse-Server

  • Self-Hosting Requirements
    Unlike fully managed BaaS platforms, you need to set up and maintain your own server infrastructure to use Parse-Server, which can be time-consuming and require technical expertise.
  • Limited Native SDKs
    Although Parse-Server provides SDKs for various platforms, it may not offer the same level of support or regular updates as commercial platforms, leading to potential compatibility issues with newer technologies.
  • Scaling Challenges
    Managing and scaling a self-hosted service can be challenging, especially for applications with growing and fluctuating user bases, requiring additional resources and infrastructure management.
  • Potential Feature Lag
    As an open-source project, Parse-Server might lag behind the latest innovations or features that commercial BaaS providers can rapidly implement due to their resources and funding.
  • Community Reliance
    Since Parse-Server is community-driven, critical bug fixes and improvements depend on community input, which can result in slower resolution times compared to proprietary solutions with dedicated support teams.

Analysis of Parse-Server

Overall verdict

  • Parse-Server is considered a good choice, particularly for developers looking for a flexible, open-source backend solution that avoids vendor lock-in. It offers a robust set of features out of the box, which can significantly accelerate the development process.

Why this product is good

  • Parse-Server is an open-source backend platform that allows developers to build applications faster by leveraging features like user authentication, push notifications, cloud functions, and real-time database capabilities. It is highly customizable, scalable, and can be deployed on any infrastructure. Moreover, it's backed by a strong community and extensive documentation, making troubleshooting and development easier.

Recommended for

    Parse-Server is recommended for startups, small to medium enterprises, and individual developers seeking a cost-effective backend solution with full control over their infrastructure. It's also ideal for projects that require rapid prototyping and deployment, app developers who need pre-built SDKs, and teams looking to migrate away from Parse's legacy hosted services.

Sound Control videos

LizardSkin Sound Control Test

More videos:

  • Review - Klock Werks Dynamat Sound Control Kit Review and Install
  • Review - Get the 'Ultimate Sound Control' for Your Device

Parse-Server videos

No Parse-Server videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Sound Control and Parse-Server)
Note Taking
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Focus Music
100 100%
0% 0
Design Prototyping
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Sound Control and Parse-Server. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Sound Control and Parse-Server

Sound Control Reviews

  1. IngAjVillalon
    ยท CEO at Villalon Engineering ยท
    Staticz Software's update system sucks

    It's been more than two months since Mac OS 15 came out, and we still don't have a functional update to be able to use it even though we have paid for the license.

    ๐Ÿ‘ Pros:    It works sometimes
    ๐Ÿ‘Ž Cons:    The update system sucks

Parse-Server Reviews

Firebase Alternative: 3 Open-Source ways toย follow
Parse Server comes with a gazillion out-of-the-box features that allows you to get your MVP out quick and effortlessly. Currently, Parse server is the most popular and robust BaaS framework available that helps developers build mobile apps faster without any technical locks. It is an open source version of the Parse backend that can be easily downloaded for free on GitHub....
Source: medium.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Sound Control should be more popular than Parse-Server. It has been mentiond 23 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Sound Control mentions (23)

  • Detailed audio device control?
    Not sure it has those specific features but you may want to check out Sound Control. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Audio/Sound/Volume Mixer - Concept UI Art - macOS
    SoundControl is exactly this and more: https://staticz.com/soundcontrol/. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Earhive Gen3 V1E - Unable to adjust volume when paired to Macbook pro M1
    Hey, bro, I think I've found a solution: I installed the SoundControl software, enabled the "Force Soft Volume Control" option. Yay, the volume is now adjustable! Hope this helps you too! Screenshot. Source: over 3 years ago
  • No Mac support, not obvious on product page.
    I havenโ€™t installed it yet, Iโ€™ve got a few days off and donโ€™t want to waste the trial period. This is the one I bookmarked from the ones I found: https://staticz.com/soundcontrol/. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Controlling USB-C monitor volume with keyboard keys?
    IDK whether a 3rd party software audio mixer would help; you may download a trial here: https://staticz.com/soundcontrol/. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

Parse-Server mentions (6)

  • AI Coding: Building a 1-Hour App Clone Is Easy. Shipping It Is the Work
    If youโ€™re coming from the Parse ecosystem, it may help to know that Parse itself is a long-running open source backend framework. You can start from the official Parse Platform site, or go deeper with the communityโ€™s Parse Server repository. Our own developer docs are organized around that reality. If you want implementation-level guides, start with our SashiDo Documentation. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • What to choose for backend
    If you like headless CMS / Backend As A Service you should consider https://directus.io/ or https://github.com/parse-community/parse-server. Both nodejs and open source. Source: about 4 years ago
  • Any general purpose visualisation "just add the data" framework
    There's numerous standard backends which frontenders could use in simplistic cases to start, say https://github.com/PostgREST/postgrest or https://github.com/parse-community/parse-server. Source: over 4 years ago
  • Show HN: Caffeine, minimum viable back end for prototyping
    Parse is still around and supported: https://github.com/parse-community/parse-server. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
  • Ask HN: What Back End Framework with User Management Is Your Favorite?
    I am curious what backend framework you would choose to run with for prototyping an application with run of the mill user management requirements. That is functionality along the lines of: session management, password policies, password reset, user verifications, etc. Sadly it seems there really aren't any frameworks that have user management natively supported. The only one I am aware of is [Parse... - Source: Hacker News / about 5 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Sound Control and Parse-Server, you can also consider the following products

SoundSource - The sound control that should be built into MacOS

Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.

Volume2 - Volume2 is an advanced Windows audio mixer, a complete replacement for the standard Volume Control.

Marvel - Turn sketches, mockups and designs into web, iPhone, iOS, Android and Apple Watch app prototypes.

EarTrumpet - Volume Control for Windows

Moovweb Platform - Other Mobile Development