Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Social-Engineer Toolkit VS Commit Together by Github

Compare Social-Engineer Toolkit VS Commit Together by Github and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Social-Engineer Toolkit logo Social-Engineer Toolkit

The Social-Engineer Toolkit is an open source penetration testing framework designed for social...

Commit Together by Github logo Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits
  • Social-Engineer Toolkit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-13
  • Commit Together by Github Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-04

Social-Engineer Toolkit features and specs

  • Comprehensive Toolset
    The Social-Engineer Toolkit (SET) offers a wide range of features that cover numerous aspects of social engineering, including phishing attacks, credential harvesting, and more. This makes it a versatile tool for users looking to simulate or learn about social engineering techniques in a controlled environment.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    SET provides a user-friendly interface that makes it accessible to users who may not be highly technical. This allows a broader audience to utilize the tool for educational, testing, and security purposes.
  • Regular Updates
    The tool is regularly updated to include new features, improvements, and bug fixes. This ensures that users have access to the latest security tactics and attack vectors, enhancing the tool's effectiveness over time.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, SET allows users to review its code, ensuring transparency and enabling customization according to specific needs. This also fosters a community-driven approach to tool development and improvement.

Possible disadvantages of Social-Engineer Toolkit

  • Legal and Ethical Concerns
    While SET is a powerful tool for education and simulated testing, it can be misused for unethical activities if placed in the wrong hands. Users must have a clear understanding of legal and ethical implications before using SET.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendliness, users may encounter a learning curve, especially those who are unfamiliar with social engineering concepts and the technical aspects of cybersecurity testing.
  • Dependency on Environment
    SET might require specific environments or dependencies to be fully functional, which can lead to compatibility issues or require additional setup efforts for users unfamiliar with such configurations.
  • Potential for Misconfiguration
    There is a possibility of misconfiguration when setting up and using SET, which could lead to less effective simulation of attacks or even security risks if not handled properly.

Commit Together by Github features and specs

  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages of Commit Together by Github

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Social-Engineer Toolkit videos

Stealing Credentials with the Social-Engineer Toolkit (SET)

More videos:

  • Review - David Kennedy - Social-Engineer Toolkit (SET v7.0)
  • Review - ๐Ÿ’ผSET๐Ÿ’ผ(Social-Engineer Toolkit)๐ŸฆœParrot Security OS๐Ÿ“ฑIphone X๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ

Commit Together by Github videos

No Commit Together by Github videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Social-Engineer Toolkit and Commit Together by Github)
Security
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Web Application Security
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Social-Engineer Toolkit and Commit Together by Github. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Social-Engineer Toolkit should be more popular than Commit Together by Github. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Social-Engineer Toolkit mentions (2)

  • How can a file be malicious?
    There's programs out there to make these malicious PDFs, word documents, etc https://github.com/trustedsec/social-engineer-toolkit. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Awesome Penetration Testing
    Social Engineer Toolkit (SET) - Open source pentesting framework designed for social engineering featuring a number of custom attack vectors to make believable attacks quickly. - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago

Commit Together by Github mentions (1)

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Social-Engineer Toolkit and Commit Together by Github, you can also consider the following products

ZoomEye - Network mapping service

Refined GitHub - Browser extension that makes GitHub cleaner & more powerful

Armitage - Armitage makes penetration testing easy by adding a GUI to the Metasploit framework

GitHub for Mobile - The worldโ€™s development platform, in your pocket

Cobalt Strike - Advanced threat tactics for penetration testers.

GitHub for Atom - Git and GitHub integration right inside Atom