Software Alternatives & Startups

Soasta TouchTest VS Cloudsmith

Compare Soasta TouchTest VS Cloudsmith and see what are their differences

Soasta TouchTest

TouchTest makes it faster and easier than ever to test and deliver high-quality mobile applications.

No screenshot yet
Rating
0 reviews
Cloudsmith

Cloudsmith is the preferred software platform for securely storing and sharing packages and containers. We have distributed millions of packages for innovative companies around the world.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid Free trial

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Cloudsmith seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 2
Developer Tools popularity
14% vs 86%
alternatives listed
14 vs 75

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Soasta TouchTest
Cloudsmith
Website soasta.com cloudsmith.com
Pricing
Paid Free trial Official pricing
Listed in

About Soasta TouchTest and Cloudsmith

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Soasta TouchTest
Cloudsmith

No description of Soasta TouchTest yet.

Cloudsmith is a single source of truth for all your software assets, available to teams, individuals, customers and build processes anywhere on the planet. Cloudsmith is the only cloud-native, universal package management solution, allowing your organization to create, store and share packages in...

Read more about Cloudsmith

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Soasta TouchTest 5 features
Cloudsmith 5 features
  • Real Device Testing
    SOASTA TouchTest allows testing on real mobile devices rather than just emulators or simulators, providing more accurate and realistic test results that reflect actual user experiences.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    TouchTest supports testing across multiple mobile platforms including iOS and Android, enabling teams to use a single tool for testing apps on different operating systems.
  • Integration with CloudTest
    TouchTest integrates with SOASTA's CloudTest platform, allowing teams to combine functional mobile testing with performance and load testing in a unified environment for more comprehensive test coverage.
  • Visual Test Creation
    The tool offers a visual, record-and-playback approach to creating test scripts, making it accessible to testers who may not have deep programming expertise and speeding up the test creation process.
  • Continuous Testing Support
    TouchTest supports integration into CI/CD pipelines, enabling automated mobile testing as part of continuous integration and delivery workflows, which helps teams deliver quality apps faster.

Possible disadvantages

  • Acquisition and Product Uncertainty
    SOASTA was acquired by Akamai in 2017, and much of the original product line including TouchTest has been discontinued or absorbed, leading to uncertainty about long-term support and availability.
  • Cost
    SOASTA TouchTest was an enterprise-grade solution with pricing that could be prohibitively expensive for smaller teams or organizations, making it less accessible compared to open-source alternatives like Appium.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its visual interface, the tool had a significant learning curve for advanced test scenarios, requiring considerable time investment to master its full capabilities and configuration options.
  • Limited Community and Resources
    Compared to open-source mobile testing tools, TouchTest had a smaller community of users, meaning fewer online resources, tutorials, and community-driven support were available for troubleshooting.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Using TouchTest meant relying heavily on SOASTA's proprietary ecosystem, making it difficult to migrate tests or workflows to alternative tools if the need arose, creating significant vendor lock-in risks.
  • Universal Support
    Cloudsmith supports a wide range of package formats, enabling seamless management for different types of software artifacts in one place.
  • Security Features
    Offers comprehensive security features including encryption, access controls, and logging, ensuring the integrity and confidentiality of your packages.
  • Reliable Hosting and Distribution
    Provides a reliable cloud-based system for hosting and distributing software packages, reducing infrastructure overhead and ensuring high availability.
  • Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) Integration
    Easily integrates with popular CI/CD tools, streamlining the build, release, and deployment process for development teams.
  • Global Content Delivery Network (CDN)
    Utilizes a global CDN to ensure fast and reliable delivery of software packages to developers around the world.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Cloudsmith can be expensive compared to self-hosted solutions, particularly for organizations with large-scale needs.
  • Complexity
    The vast array of features might be overwhelming for new users or small teams with simple package management needs.
  • Dependency on Internet Access
    Being a cloud-based solution, Cloudsmith requires reliable internet access, which could be a potential issue in environments with limited connectivity.
  • Learning Curve
    Users may encounter a learning curve when adopting Cloudsmith, particularly if they are transitioning from a simpler or different package management system.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Soasta TouchTest
Cloudsmith

Overall verdict

  • Soasta TouchTest was a capable mobile app testing and performance automation tool, but it is now discontinued/outdated since Soasta was acquired by Akamai and later Tricentis absorbed its technology, so it's not a viable choice for new projects today.

Why this product is good

  • Historically offered robust automated testing for native and hybrid mobile apps across real devices
  • Provided cloud-based load and performance testing capabilities integrated with CI/CD pipelines
  • Supported gesture-based test scripting which was innovative for mobile UI testing at the time
  • Backed by Soasta's broader performance testing platform, giving it credibility in enterprise environments

Recommended for

  • Legacy enterprises still maintaining older Soasta-based testing infrastructure
  • Teams researching the history of mobile test automation tools
  • Organizations transitioning away from TouchTest who need to understand its prior functionality before migrating to modern alternatives like Tricentis, BrowserStack, or Sauce Labs

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Cloudsmith is generally considered a good platform for managing software distribution and package management.

Why this product is good

  • Cloudsmith is appreciated for its robust features and flexibility in handling various package types, making it a versatile choice for developers. It offers secure, scalable, and private repositories for managing your software assets and supports multiple package formats, including Docker, Maven, npm, and more. The platform also provides strong security features to ensure the protection of software packages.

Recommended for

  • Organizations seeking a reliable and secure platform for software package distribution.
  • Developers who need support for multiple package formats in a unified platform.
  • Teams looking for a scalable solution to manage private repositories with strong access controls.
  • Companies interested in improving their DevOps processes through integrated package management solutions.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Soasta TouchTest 0 videos + Add
Cloudsmith 1 video + Add

No Soasta TouchTest videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Using Cloudsmith to store and distribute any type of file

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Soasta TouchTest
Cloudsmith
14% 14%
86% 86%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Soasta TouchTest and Cloudsmith. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Soasta TouchTest no reviews yet
Cloudsmith no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Soasta TouchTest yet. Be the first one to post

  • Repository Management Tools
    mindmajix.com · Jan 2023

    Cloundsmith Package is one of the best DevOps tools that is available in the Repository Management space and also ensures that levels up your DevOps enterprise-grade repositories as like Debian, Maven, Python, Ruby,...

  • What is Artifactory?
    blog.packagecloud.io · Feb 2022

    Cloudsmith Package makes sure that your DevOps enterprise-grade repositories, such as Vagrant, Ruby, Python, Maven, Debian, and others, are leveled up. It allows you to concentrate on your product because Cloudsmith...

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Soasta TouchTest 0 mentions
Cloudsmith 2 mentions

Tracking Soasta TouchTest since Mar 2021.

  • How a Beige Keyboard Changed My Life: From C64 to CTO
    Now, well beyond the fall of Newzbin, and with a stint in corporate land, security, and fintech, I’m co-founder and CTO of Cloudsmith (website). We use our unique blend of cloud-native artifact management to secure the software supply... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Lazygit: A simple terminal UI for Git commands
    Linus Torvalds about this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pzl1B7nB9Kc Distros (Debian in particular comes to mind) have some really annoying packaging rules, and as a maintainer of a Go program, it's a huge pain, so we decided to just... - Source: Hacker News / almost 5 years ago

Alternatives to Soasta TouchTest and Cloudsmith

When comparing Soasta TouchTest and Cloudsmith, you can also consider the following products.