Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

soapUI VS pytest

Compare soapUI VS pytest and see what are their differences

soapUI logo soapUI

SoapUI Pro is one of the most prominent API testing platforms around, allowing developers to quickly prototype the functions of their apps and get them to market with little hassle.

pytest logo pytest

Javascript Testing Framework
  • soapUI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-16
  • pytest Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-15

soapUI features and specs

  • Comprehensive Testing
    soapUI supports a wide range of testing types including functional, security, and load testing, providing a one-stop solution for API testing needs.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The tool features an intuitive graphical user interface, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise.
  • Extensive Protocol Support
    soapUI supports multiple protocols like SOAP, REST, JMS, AMF, as well as a range of underlying technologies including HTTP, HTTPS, JMS, etc., offering flexibility in testing different kinds of APIs.
  • Scripting Capability
    With Groovy scripting support, users can create custom assertions, automation scripts, and add advanced logic to their tests.
  • Community and Documentation
    A large community of users and extensive documentation and tutorials are available, aiding in faster troubleshooting and learning.
  • Integrations
    soapUI integrates well with other tools such as Jenkins, Maven, and JIRA, streamlining the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Open Source Version
    The availability of an open-source version allows users to start testing without any initial cost.

Possible disadvantages of soapUI

  • Performance Issues
    soapUI can become slow, especially with large and complex projects, which can affect productivity.
  • High Memory Usage
    The application often consumes a significant amount of memory, leading to potential performance degradation on less powerful machines.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic features are user-friendly, mastering advanced functionalities and scripting capabilities can be challenging for beginners.
  • Limited Advanced Reporting
    The reporting capabilities in the open-source version are quite basic compared to other commercial API testing tools.
  • Paid Licensing for Pro Features
    Many advanced features and more efficient workflows are locked behind the paid 'Pro' version, which might not be affordable for smaller teams or individual developers.
  • UI Glitches
    Users occasionally report glitches and bugs in the graphical user interface, which can be inconvenient and interrupt workflow.
  • Lack of Cloud Deployment
    As of now, soapUI does not offer a cloud-native or SaaS version, limiting flexibility for teams that prefer cloud-based tools.

pytest features and specs

  • Easy to Use
    Pytest is designed to be simple and easy to use, with minimal boilerplate code required to write tests. Its straightforward syntax allows users to quickly write and understand tests.
  • Extensive Plugin System
    Pytest has a flexible and powerful plugin architecture, with a wide range of community-maintained plugins available, allowing for easy customization and extension of its functionality.
  • Detailed Information on Failures
    Pytest provides detailed and informative feedback on failures, enhancing the debugging process by highlighting where and why a test failed.
  • Fixture Support
    Pytest's fixture system allows for easy setup and teardown of test environments, encouraging the reuse of setup code and reducing code duplication.
  • Compatibility
    Pytest is compatible with standard Python testing frameworks such as unittest, allowing for easy migration and integration of existing tests.

Possible disadvantages of pytest

  • Steeper Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic usage is straightforward, mastering advanced pytest features, such as writing custom plugins and fixtures, can have a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Overhead
    For very large projects, the additional features and flexibility of pytest can introduce some performance overhead when running tests, compared to simpler testing frameworks.
  • Complexity in Parameterized Testing
    While pytest supports parameterized testing, setting up and managing complex parameterizations can become cumbersome and might require additional abstraction layers.
  • Plugin Conflicts
    With a vast ecosystem of plugins, there is a potential for conflicts or compatibility issues between different plugins, especially when they modify similar pytest behaviors.

Analysis of soapUI

Overall verdict

  • Overall, SoapUI is considered a good tool for API testing, particularly for those looking for an all-in-one solution. Its extensive feature set and flexibility in handling different test scenarios make it a reliable choice in the industry. However, users should be aware of its potentially steep learning curve and resource-intensive nature, especially with large test suites.

Why this product is good

  • SoapUI is widely regarded as a robust tool for API testing due to its comprehensive set of features, including functional testing, security testing, and load testing capabilities. It offers a user-friendly interface that allows both technical and non-technical users to create and execute tests with ease. Furthermore, SoapUI supports multiple protocols such as SOAP, REST, JMS, and HTTP, making it versatile for various testing scenarios.

Recommended for

    SoapUI is recommended for QA engineers, developers, and testers who need a powerful tool to test APIs thoroughly. It is suitable for organizations that require detailed and comprehensive API testing solutions and are looking for a tool that can integrate with their DevOps processes. Additionally, teams using multiple API protocols will benefit from SoapUI's versatility.

soapUI videos

REST API Automation - SoapUI OpenSource Review - Mac

More videos:

  • Review - Testing REST API with SoapUI OpenSource - Part 6 - Assertions - Mac
  • Review - SoapUI Certification : Basic details about certification

pytest videos

getting started with pytest (beginner - intermediate) anthony explains #518

More videos:

  • Review - Python Code Review: Adding Pytest Tests to an Existing Python Web Scraper
  • Review - pytest: everything you need to know about fixtures (intermediate) anthony explains #487

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to soapUI and pytest)
Website Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Automated Testing
83 83%
17% 17
Software Testing
100 100%
0% 0
Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using soapUI and pytest. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare soapUI and pytest

soapUI Reviews

Top 20 Open Source & Cloud Free Postman Alternatives (2024 Updated)
Product Introduction: SoapUI is a robust tool for testing SOAP and REST APIs, known for its extensive testing capabilities, including functional, load, and security testing, which makes it the perfect postman alternative.
Source: medium.com
Best Postman Alternatives To Consider in 2025
This open-source tool caters specifically to SOAP and RESTful web services. SoapUI excels in security testing, with features like load testing and functional testing. While not as beginner friendly as Postman, SoapUI offers a comprehensive solution for more complex API testing needs.
Postman Alternatives for API Testing and Monitoring
SoapUI is a popular open-source and commercial API testing tool (the commercial is called ReadyAPI), due to its powerful capabilities, flexibility and user-friendly platform. It’s particularly effective for testing SOAP, REST and GraphQL APIs. SoapUI allows inputting the WSDL or endpoint URL, configuring the requests with headers, parameters, or body content and sending the...
15 Best Postman Alternatives for Automated API Testing [2022 Updated]
SoapUI provides security and load testing features, and its functional testing supports SOAP and REST API. Users can use SoapUI’s drag-and-drop or point-and-click for scripting features, creating and running automated regression, compliance, and load tests on Web API.
Source: testsigma.com
15 BEST SoapUI Alternatives (2022 Update)
SoapUI is a widely popular API testing tool. It allows you to test REST and SOAP protocols. It facilitates seamless integrations and reusability of scripts. However, load and workflow testing is difficult with SoapUI.
Source: www.guru99.com

pytest Reviews

25 Python Frameworks to Master
Pytest is a widely adopted testing framework that is designed to be easy to use and extend. It helps you to write elegant tests in both small and complex Python codebases.
Source: kinsta.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, pytest seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

soapUI mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of soapUI yet. Tracking of soapUI recommendations started around Mar 2021.

pytest mentions (5)

  • An Introduction to Testing with Django for Python
    Pytest is an excellent alternative to unittest. Even though it doesn't come built-in to Python itself, it is considered more pythonic than unittest. It doesn't require a TestClass, has less boilerplate code, and has a plain assert statement. Pytest has a rich plugin ecosystem, including a specific Django plugin, pytest-django. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • How I Added Continuous Integration (CI) to a C++ Project
    For this lab exercise I had the opportunity to add unit tests to a classmate's project and experience their CI workflow. For this exercise I worked on go-go-web by kliu57. Go-Go Web is written in Python and uses the pytest testing framework. This was my first time writing tests for pytest, but I found the pytest docs helpful. However, more helpful was the information provided in the associated issue and the tests... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • CI/CD Part 1: Unit/Integration Testing
    This week, in a setup for a CI/CD pipeline, I added unit and integration testing using Pytest to my Python CLI and utilized pytest-cov for generating a coverage report. As always, the merged commit for changes to the repo can be found here. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Testing in Python
    After looking through the various unit testing tools available for Python like pytest, unittest (built-in), and nose, I went with pytest for its simlpicity and ease of use. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Testing and Refactoring With pytest and pytest-cov
    Up until now we've been using python's unittest module. This was chosen as a first step since it comes with python out of the box. Now that we've gone over dev dependencies I think it's a good time to look at pytest as a unit test alternative. I highly recommend getting accustomed to pytest as it's used quite often in the python ecosystem to handle testing for projects. It's also a bit more user friendly in how it... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing soapUI and pytest, you can also consider the following products

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

JUnit - JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests.

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.

TestComplete - TestComplete Desktop, Web, and Mobile helps you create repeatable and accurate automated tests across multiple devices, platforms, and environments easily and quickly.

unittest - Testing Frameworks