Easy to Use
Pytest is designed to be simple and easy to use, with minimal boilerplate code required to write tests. Its straightforward syntax allows users to quickly write and understand tests.
Extensive Plugin System
Pytest has a flexible and powerful plugin architecture, with a wide range of community-maintained plugins available, allowing for easy customization and extension of its functionality.
Detailed Information on Failures
Pytest provides detailed and informative feedback on failures, enhancing the debugging process by highlighting where and why a test failed.
Fixture Support
Pytest's fixture system allows for easy setup and teardown of test environments, encouraging the reuse of setup code and reducing code duplication.
Compatibility
Pytest is compatible with standard Python testing frameworks such as unittest, allowing for easy migration and integration of existing tests.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if pytest is good.
Check the traffic stats of pytest on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of pytest on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of pytest's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of pytest on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about pytest on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Pytest is an excellent alternative to unittest. Even though it doesn't come built-in to Python itself, it is considered more pythonic than unittest. It doesn't require a TestClass, has less boilerplate code, and has a plain assert statement. Pytest has a rich plugin ecosystem, including a specific Django plugin, pytest-django. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
For this lab exercise I had the opportunity to add unit tests to a classmate's project and experience their CI workflow. For this exercise I worked on go-go-web by kliu57. Go-Go Web is written in Python and uses the pytest testing framework. This was my first time writing tests for pytest, but I found the pytest docs helpful. However, more helpful was the information provided in the associated issue and the tests... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
This week, in a setup for a CI/CD pipeline, I added unit and integration testing using Pytest to my Python CLI and utilized pytest-cov for generating a coverage report. As always, the merged commit for changes to the repo can be found here. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
After looking through the various unit testing tools available for Python like pytest, unittest (built-in), and nose, I went with pytest for its simlpicity and ease of use. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Up until now we've been using python's unittest module. This was chosen as a first step since it comes with python out of the box. Now that we've gone over dev dependencies I think it's a good time to look at pytest as a unit test alternative. I highly recommend getting accustomed to pytest as it's used quite often in the python ecosystem to handle testing for projects. It's also a bit more user friendly in how it... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Pytest is regarded as one of the most popular and widely adopted testing frameworks in the Python ecosystem. Its reputation is built on its simplicity, ease of use, and extensibility, which make it suitable for both small and complex codebases. Pytest stands out in the world of Python testing frameworks, often being compared favorably against competitors like unittest, JUnit, RSpec, Cucumber, and others.
A key aspect of Pytest's appeal is its design, which aligns closely with Python's philosophy of simplicity and readability. Unlike the built-in unittest
framework, Pytest does not require a TestClass
, allowing for tests to be written with less boilerplate code. The use of simple assert statements further enhances the readability of tests. This intuitive design makes it particularly attractive to developers who are new to Python testing as well as seasoned Pythonistas who appreciate succinct and expressive code.
A significant strength of Pytest is its rich plugin ecosystem, which extends its functionality far beyond basic testing. This includes integration with Django through pytest-django
, support for coverage reports with pytest-cov
, and many other plugins that cater to various test requirements. This ecosystem enables developers to tailor Pytest to their specific project needs, a flexibility that is not always present with other frameworks.
Pytest benefits from a strong and active community that contributes to its ongoing development and support. The official documentation is frequently cited as helpful, making it easier for developers to get started and implement tests efficiently. Despite occasional external resources being more directly useful, as noted in the context of integrating Pytest with a project's CI/CD pipelines, the documentation serves as a solid foundation.
Pytest is often integrated into continuous integration (CI) and continuous deployment (CD) workflows due to its ease of configuration and robust output. Documented experiences highlight its effectiveness in generating comprehensive coverage reports (using pytest-cov
), facilitating the maintenance of code quality over time. Additionally, Pytest's role in refactoring efforts is emphasized, as it allows developers to iterate on their codebases with confidence, backed by thorough testing.
In conclusion, Pytest's prominence in the Python testing landscape is well-deserved. Its design choices reflect Python's core values, and its extensibility through plugins makes it adaptable for diverse testing scenarios. The community's embrace of Pytest is evident from numerous discussions and articles highlighting its advantages over other testing frameworks. As Python continues to grow in popularity for a variety of applications, Pytest is likely to remain a trusted and versatile tool for developers worldwide.
Do you know an article comparing pytest to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is pytest good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss pytest here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.