Tap a thing and the counter resets. A quiet, local-first day counter for the things you keep meaning to do. No account needed, no spreadsheet.
sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Smoke Free
seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned
11 times
since March 2021.
social mentions
11 vs 0
Health And Fitness popularity
100% vs 0%
Base details
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
User-Friendly Interface Smoke Free offers a clean and intuitive user interface, making it easy for users to navigate through the app and access various features quickly.
Comprehensive Tracking The app provides detailed tracking of cigarettes not smoked, money saved, and time smoke-free, helping users monitor their progress effectively.
Motivational Insights Smoke Free offers motivational insights and tips, which can help users stay motivated and committed to quitting smoking.
Community Support Users can connect with a community of individuals who are also trying to quit smoking, providing peer support and encouragement.
Research-backed Methods The app uses evidence-based strategies to help users quit smoking, increasing the likelihood of success.
Possible disadvantages
Subscription Required While the app offers free features, some advanced features require a paid subscription, which may not be affordable for all users.
Limited Personalization Some users may find that the app's features are not tailored enough to their specific needs or smoking habits, reducing effectiveness.
Technical Issues Some users have reported technical issues such as crashes or bugs, which can disrupt the experience and tracking.
Initial Setup Complexity New users might find the initial setup process a bit complex or time-consuming, potentially discouraging continued use.
Lightweight C++ implementation cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
Redis-backed reliability Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
Inspired by proven design (asynq) The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
Native integration for C++ projects For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
Open source and inspectable Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.
Possible disadvantages
Limited maturity and battle-testing Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
Smaller community and ecosystem Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
Documentation gaps As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
C++ build and dependency complexity Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
Fewer built-in features and tooling cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.
Analysis
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
SF
Smoke Freecppq
No analysis of Smoke Free yet.
Overall verdict
cppq is a lightweight, Redis-backed distributed task queue for C++ inspired by Go's popular 'asynq' library. It's a good choice for developers who need a simple, dependency-light job queue system in C++ without the overhead of larger enterprise messaging systems, though it's a smaller, less battle-tested project compared to mature alternatives.
Why this product is good
Simple and lightweight design makes it easy to understand and integrate into existing C++ projects
Built on Redis, a well-established and reliable backend for queue storage, giving it a solid foundation
Inspired by asynq (a proven Go library), so the design patterns and task queue semantics are based on a well-thought-out model
Open source on GitHub, allowing developers to inspect, modify, and contribute to the code
Good fit for projects already using Redis, minimizing the need for additional infrastructure
Straightforward API for enqueueing and processing background jobs in C++ applications
Recommended for
C++ developers needing a background job/task queue without adopting a heavyweight message broker
Projects already using Redis as part of their infrastructure
Small to medium-sized applications requiring asynchronous task processing
Teams comfortable working with less mainstream or smaller open-source libraries and willing to contribute or debug issues themselves
Developers familiar with asynq (Go) looking for a similar pattern in C++
Prototyping or hobby projects where a minimal task queue solution is sufficient
Share your experience with using Smoke Free and cppq.
For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Social recommendations and mentions
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.
SF
Smoke Free11 mentionscppq0 mentions
Smokers, do you think you will continue to smoke 20 years from now?
I got the 'Smokefree' app. I just used the free version. I found it helpful for the first few months. https://smokefreeapp.com/.
Source:
almost 4 years ago
One down
It's the Smoke Free app, https://smokefreeapp.com.
Source:
almost 4 years ago
It's not a course nor a book but it was huge for me. I tried reading books, different patches, different ways to stop smoking. But in the end what made it click for me was a simple app If you want to stop smoking check it and good luck....
- Source: Hacker News
/
almost 4 years ago