Software Alternatives & Startups

Smart HTTPS VS XYplorer

Compare Smart HTTPS VS XYplorer and see what are their differences

Smart HTTPS

Automatically changes HTTP addresses to the secure HTTPS, and if loading encounters error, reverts...

Rating
0 reviews
XYplorer

File Manager for Windows

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Smart HTTPS seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
2 vs 0
Chrome Extensions popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
14 vs 138

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Smart HTTPS
XYplorer
Website mybrowseraddon.com xyplorer.com
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Smart HTTPS 4 features
XYplorer 8 features
  • Automatic Redirection to HTTPS
    Smart HTTPS automatically changes HTTP protocol to HTTPS, which enhances the security of your browsing by ensuring that the connection is encrypted.
  • Fallback to HTTP
    In cases where an HTTPS version of the site is not available, it can automatically revert back to HTTP, ensuring you can still access the website instead of facing a disruption.
  • Whitelist Feature
    Allows users to maintain a whitelist of websites that should always be accessed using HTTP, providing flexibility and control over the browsing experience.
  • Improved Privacy
    By automatically using HTTPS, it helps in protecting user data from eavesdroppers and enhances privacy while browsing the web.

Possible disadvantages

  • Compatibility Issues
    Some websites may not function correctly over HTTPS, leading to potential misbehavior or broken features when accessed using Smart HTTPS.
  • Potential for Increased Loading Times
    Sometimes, redirecting to HTTPS can result in slightly longer loading times, especially if the server's configuration is not optimal for HTTPS.
  • Resource Intensive
    The addon might consume additional resources to check for HTTPS versions of every site, which could impact browser performance, especially on older systems.
  • Limited Control Over Redirection
    Users might have limited ability to control which sites are redirected to HTTPS if they haven't preemptively whitelisted specific HTTP sites.
  • Portability
    XYplorer is a portable file manager, meaning it can be run from a USB stick without requiring installation.
  • Customizability
    The software offers a wide range of customization options, allowing users to tailor the interface and features to their specific needs.
  • Powerful Search Functionality
    XYplorer includes a robust search feature that supports Boolean logic, regex, and content searching.
  • Tab-based Interface
    The tabbed browsing makes it easy to manage multiple folders simultaneously, similar to using a web browser.
  • Scripting Capabilities
    Users can automate tasks and extend functionality using the scripting feature built into the software.
  • No Installation Required
    Since it's portable, XYplorer does not need to be installed, making it a good choice for users who do not have admin rights on their systems.
  • Regular Updates
    The software receives frequent updates, ensuring that it stays current with new features and improvements.
  • Customization of Keyboard Shortcuts
    Users can redefine keyboard shortcuts to streamline their workflow.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    XYplorer is not free; it requires a one-time payment or a subscription, which can be a deterrent for some users.
  • Windows Only
    The software is exclusively available for Windows, limiting its usability for those on other operating systems such as macOS or Linux.
  • Learning Curve
    The extensive features and customization options can be overwhelming for new users, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Potential Overkill for Basic Users
    The advanced capabilities and extensive feature set may be more than what a basic user needs, making simpler file managers a better fit for them.
  • No Cloud Integration
    XYplorer lacks built-in integration with popular cloud storage services, requiring third-party solutions or manual management.
  • Limited Customer Support
    While there is a user community and documentation, direct customer support may be limited compared to larger companies.
  • Resource Intensity
    It can be resource-intensive on older or less powerful systems, potentially slowing down performance.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Smart HTTPS
XYplorer

No analysis of Smart HTTPS yet.

Overall verdict

  • Overall, XYplorer is considered a strong choice for users looking for a versatile and powerful file management solution. Its rich feature set and user-friendly interface deserve praise; however, it might be more than needed for casual users who may not leverage all its capabilities.

Why this product is good

  • XYplorer is highly regarded for its extensive set of features, including a customizable dual-pane interface, tabbed browsing, powerful search capabilities, and scripting support. It offers robust file management tools that cater to power users who need more functionality than provided by default file explorers. Additionally, it doesn't require installation, allowing for portable use.

Recommended for

  • Power users who require advanced file management features.
  • IT professionals and system administrators who need a portable solution.
  • Users who favor extensive customization and scripting capabilities.
  • People who frequently manage large volumes of files and directories.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Smart HTTPS 0 videos + Add
XYplorer 3 videos + Add

No Smart HTTPS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

3D Tidy Up! XYplorer

More videos

  • - XYplorer - Manage and track files on your PC - Download Video Previews
  • - XYplorer Top # 20 Facts

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Smart HTTPS
XYplorer
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Smart HTTPS and XYplorer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Smart HTTPS no reviews yet
XYplorer no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Smart HTTPS yet. Be the first one to post

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Smart HTTPS 2 mentions
XYplorer 0 mentions
  • “We don’t track you … except for when we get paid for it.”
    Smart HTTPS, site This tries to send you to https sites instead of http sites. Using http sites makes you venerable to man in the middle attacks. (dont use http on public wifis if possible). Source: over 4 years ago
  • question about non secure websites
    I'd recommend using Smart HTTPS which automatically makes your site's HTTPS if it can offer it so it will reduce these situations. Here's the site where you can choose whichever browser you use. https://mybrowseraddon.com/smart-https.html. Source: over 4 years ago

Tracking XYplorer since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Smart HTTPS and XYplorer

When comparing Smart HTTPS and XYplorer, you can also consider the following products.