Software Alternatives & Startups

Smart HTTPS VS SSL Enforcer

Compare Smart HTTPS VS SSL Enforcer and see what are their differences

Smart HTTPS

Automatically changes HTTP addresses to the secure HTTPS, and if loading encounters error, reverts...

Smart HTTPS Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
SSL Enforcer

SSL Enforcer - Force SSL/TLS encryption for any browser or app. Block all unsecure connections.

SSL Enforcer Landing page
Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Smart HTTPS seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
2 vs 0
Chrome Extensions popularity
56% vs 44%
alternatives listed
15 vs 20

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Smart HTTPS
SSL Enforcer
Website mybrowseraddon.com sslenforcer.com
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Smart HTTPS 4 features
SSL Enforcer 4 features
  • Automatic Redirection to HTTPS
    Smart HTTPS automatically changes HTTP protocol to HTTPS, which enhances the security of your browsing by ensuring that the connection is encrypted.
  • Fallback to HTTP
    In cases where an HTTPS version of the site is not available, it can automatically revert back to HTTP, ensuring you can still access the website instead of facing a disruption.
  • Whitelist Feature
    Allows users to maintain a whitelist of websites that should always be accessed using HTTP, providing flexibility and control over the browsing experience.
  • Improved Privacy
    By automatically using HTTPS, it helps in protecting user data from eavesdroppers and enhances privacy while browsing the web.

Possible disadvantages

  • Compatibility Issues
    Some websites may not function correctly over HTTPS, leading to potential misbehavior or broken features when accessed using Smart HTTPS.
  • Potential for Increased Loading Times
    Sometimes, redirecting to HTTPS can result in slightly longer loading times, especially if the server's configuration is not optimal for HTTPS.
  • Resource Intensive
    The addon might consume additional resources to check for HTTPS versions of every site, which could impact browser performance, especially on older systems.
  • Limited Control Over Redirection
    Users might have limited ability to control which sites are redirected to HTTPS if they haven't preemptively whitelisted specific HTTP sites.
  • Increased Security
    SSL Enforcer ensures that all of the data transferred between your computer and the internet is encrypted using SSL/TLS protocols, protecting sensitive information from eavesdroppers and hackers.
  • Automatic HTTPS Switching
    The tool automatically redirects HTTP connections to HTTPS, ensuring that you are always using a secure connection without needing to manually check and switch.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    SSL Enforcer offers an intuitive interface that makes it easy for users of all technical levels to navigate and ensure their connections are secure.
  • Works Across Different Applications
    Unlike browser-based solutions, SSL Enforcer can be used to secure connections from various applications, not just web browsers.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Compatibility
    SSL Enforcer may not be fully compatible with all software or older systems, which could impede its effectiveness.
  • Potential Performance Overhead
    The constant redirection from HTTP to HTTPS might lead to slight performance overhead, impacting speed and responsiveness.
  • Requires Some Technical Knowledge for Advanced Configuration
    While basic functions are user-friendly, advanced configuration might require technical knowledge, potentially posing challenges for some users.
  • Dependency on System Resources
    As an additional layer of security, SSL Enforcer may consume system resources, which could impact the performance of other applications.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Smart HTTPS
SSL Enforcer
56% 56%
44% 44%
56% 56%
44% 44%
59% 59%
41% 41%
52% 52%
48% 48%

User comments

Share your experience with using Smart HTTPS and SSL Enforcer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Smart HTTPS 2 mentions
SSL Enforcer 0 mentions
  • “We don’t track you … except for when we get paid for it.”
    Smart HTTPS, site This tries to send you to https sites instead of http sites. Using http sites makes you venerable to man in the middle attacks. (dont use http on public wifis if possible). Source: over 4 years ago
  • question about non secure websites
    I'd recommend using Smart HTTPS which automatically makes your site's HTTPS if it can offer it so it will reduce these situations. Here's the site where you can choose whichever browser you use. https://mybrowseraddon.com/smart-https.html. Source: over 4 years ago

Tracking SSL Enforcer since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Smart HTTPS and SSL Enforcer

When comparing Smart HTTPS and SSL Enforcer, you can also consider the following products.