Smalltalk VS Ember-cli

• Pure Object-Oriented Language
  Smalltalk is consistently object-oriented. Everything is an object, including primitive operations, which simplifies the mental model for developers.
• Interactive Development Environment
  Smalltalk offers a rich, dynamic development environment with tools for live code updates and immediate feedback, enhancing productivity and experimentation.
• Simple Syntax
  The language has a small and easily understandable syntax, which makes it more accessible to beginners and allows developers to focus more on problem-solving.
• Dynamic Typing
  Smalltalk's dynamic typing allows for flexible coding and polymorphism, making it easy to write generic and reusable code components.
• Mature and Influential
  As one of the oldest object-oriented languages, Smalltalk has a rich history, influencing many modern languages like Java, Ruby, and Python.

Possible disadvantages

• Performance
  Smalltalk can suffer from slower performance due to its high level of abstraction and dynamic typing, which may not be suitable for compute-intensive applications.
• Niche Community
  The Smalltalk community is relatively small compared to more mainstream languages, which can limit resources, libraries, and support available for developers.
• Learning Curve
  While the syntax is simple, Smalltalk's unique development environment and paradigms can introduce a learning curve for developers coming from other languages.
• Limited Integration
  Interfacing Smalltalk with non-Smalltalk systems can be challenging, limiting its use in mixed technology environments without proper bridging mechanisms.
• Dynamic Typing Drawbacks
  While flexible, dynamic typing can also lead to runtime errors that are not caught at compile time, potentially making debugging more difficult.

• Convention over Configuration
  Ember-cli enforces strong conventions for file structure, naming, and project organization, which reduces decision fatigue and makes it easier for developers to jump between different Ember projects with minimal onboarding time.
• Built-in Tooling
  Comes with a robust set of built-in tools including a development server, testing framework integration (QUnit), asset compilation, and live reload, reducing the need to manually configure and integrate third-party build tools.
• Addon Ecosystem
  Ember-cli supports a rich ecosystem of addons that can be easily installed and integrated into projects, allowing developers to extend functionality without reinventing the wheel for common features.
• Blueprints and Generators
  Provides powerful generator commands (blueprints) that scaffold components, routes, models, and other application pieces quickly, speeding up development and ensuring consistency across the codebase.
• Stable Long-term Support
  Ember-cli follows Ember's release cycle with clear LTS (Long Term Support) versions, providing stability and predictability for teams maintaining large applications over time.

Possible disadvantages

• Steep Learning Curve
  The strict conventions and unique architecture of Ember-cli can be difficult for newcomers to learn, especially those coming from more flexible frameworks or with no prior Ember experience.
• Smaller Community Compared to Alternatives
  Compared to tools like Vite, Webpack, or CRA used with React/Vue, Ember-cli has a smaller community and ecosystem, which can mean fewer third-party resources, tutorials, and community-driven troubleshooting.
• Build Performance
  For large applications, Ember-cli's build process can become slow, and while improvements have been made with embroider, some developers still report slower build times compared to more modern bundlers.
• Rigid Structure
  The opinionated nature of Ember-cli, while helpful for consistency, can feel restrictive for developers who prefer more flexibility in structuring their applications or adopting non-standard patterns.
• Migration Complexity
  Upgrading between major Ember-cli versions or migrating to newer build systems like Embroider can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for older or heavily customized applications.

No analysis of Smalltalk yet.

• Old version of offline Scratch that had a secret OS

  Also, it's not really an "operating system", nor was it implemented by the ST. It's just part of Squeak (you got the name right), the "engine" Scratch 1.x was made with (which lets you edit the code in the same window it's running in). Source: over 3 years ago

• Ask HN: Alternatives to organizing code in files and folders?

  Just downloaded https://squeak.org/ to play around with this concept. I wonder if there is already a modern tool/suite for Node/Python inspired by Smalltalk... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

• What are some important differences between the popular versions of OOP (e.g. Java, Python) vs. the purist's versions of OOP (e.g. Smalltalk)?

  AFAIK the major SmallTalk distributions are https://squeak.org/ and https://pharo.org/. I've heard that Pharo is more complex and "practical", while Squeak is more educational and beginner-friendly. But both stick to their roots with... Source: over 3 years ago

View more

• Help! Why does chrome console inner text and my program inner text not return the same values? (spent nearly the whole day trying to extract an element). Turned to reddit as its always had the best community. Any help is MASSIVELY appreciated. Puppeteer!!

  The webpage is LinkedIn.com. While this isn’t a framework, I know that are using https://cli.emberjs.com/release/. Source: about 5 years ago