Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Smalltalk VS D (Programming Language)

Compare Smalltalk VS D (Programming Language) and see what are their differences

Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Smalltalk logo Smalltalk

Smalltalk is an object-oriented programming (OOP) language. It is objects all the way down.

D (Programming Language) logo D (Programming Language)

D is a language with C-like syntax and static typing.
  • Smalltalk Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-10
  • D (Programming Language) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-09

Smalltalk features and specs

  • Pure Object-Oriented Language
    Smalltalk is consistently object-oriented. Everything is an object, including primitive operations, which simplifies the mental model for developers.
  • Interactive Development Environment
    Smalltalk offers a rich, dynamic development environment with tools for live code updates and immediate feedback, enhancing productivity and experimentation.
  • Simple Syntax
    The language has a small and easily understandable syntax, which makes it more accessible to beginners and allows developers to focus more on problem-solving.
  • Dynamic Typing
    Smalltalk's dynamic typing allows for flexible coding and polymorphism, making it easy to write generic and reusable code components.
  • Mature and Influential
    As one of the oldest object-oriented languages, Smalltalk has a rich history, influencing many modern languages like Java, Ruby, and Python.

Possible disadvantages of Smalltalk

  • Performance
    Smalltalk can suffer from slower performance due to its high level of abstraction and dynamic typing, which may not be suitable for compute-intensive applications.
  • Niche Community
    The Smalltalk community is relatively small compared to more mainstream languages, which can limit resources, libraries, and support available for developers.
  • Learning Curve
    While the syntax is simple, Smalltalk's unique development environment and paradigms can introduce a learning curve for developers coming from other languages.
  • Limited Integration
    Interfacing Smalltalk with non-Smalltalk systems can be challenging, limiting its use in mixed technology environments without proper bridging mechanisms.
  • Dynamic Typing Drawbacks
    While flexible, dynamic typing can also lead to runtime errors that are not caught at compile time, potentially making debugging more difficult.

D (Programming Language) features and specs

  • Performance
    D is designed to be a high-performance systems programming language, offering performance comparable to C and C++ through native machine code compilation.
  • Expressiveness
    D features a rich standard library and modern language constructs, such as garbage collection, first-class arrays, and advanced templating, making it easier to write expressive and maintainable code.
  • Memory Safety
    D offers optional garbage collection along with manual memory management. This hybrid approach can help in developing safer applications by reducing memory-related errors.
  • Interoperability
    D can easily interoperate with C API, enabling seamless integration with existing C libraries and systems. It also supports better C++ interoperability compared to other languages.
  • Built-in Unit Testing
    D has built-in support for unit tests, allowing developers to write and run tests as part of the language itself, facilitating test-driven development.
  • Concurrency
    D offers built-in concurrency support with message passing, similar to the actor model found in languages like Erlang, making it easier to write concurrent and parallel programs.

Possible disadvantages of D (Programming Language)

  • Adoption
    D is not as widely adopted as other languages like C, C++, or Java. This limited adoption means fewer libraries, frameworks, and community support.
  • Toolchain Maturity
    While D's compilers and tools have improved over the years, they may still lack the maturity and feature set of more established languages, which can affect developer productivity.
  • Learning Curve
    D's richness and combination of paradigms (such as imperative, object-oriented, and functional programming) can present a steep learning curve for new developers.
  • Garbage Collection
    Although D offers optional garbage collection, its reliance on it for memory safety might be seen as a drawback for real-time system development where deterministic memory management is crucial.
  • Ecosystem
    The ecosystem for D is less vibrant compared to more popular languages, leading to potentially fewer third-party libraries, tools, and resources.
  • Standard Library Documentation
    The standard library documentation can be inconsistent or less comprehensive compared to other languages, making it difficult for developers to fully utilize all features of the language.

Analysis of D (Programming Language)

Overall verdict

  • Overall, D is a solid programming language choice that balances performance with productivity. It may not be as widely adopted as some other languages, but it has a dedicated community and continues to evolve, making it a viable option for various programming tasks.

Why this product is good

  • The D programming language is considered good by many developers for various reasons. It combines the performance and low-level control of C/C++ with the expressive power and ease of use found in modern languages. D offers features like garbage collection, first-class functions, and compile-time function execution, providing both speed and flexibility. Its interoperability with C, the convenience of a powerful standard library (Phobos), and the availability of packages via the DUB package manager make it a practical choice for systems programming, application development, and rapid prototyping.

Recommended for

  • System programming enthusiasts looking for an alternative to C/C++
  • Developers interested in writing high-performance applications
  • Programmers who appreciate modern language features and strong community support
  • Projects requiring seamless C integration
  • Individuals looking for a language that supports easy code maintenance and scalability

Smalltalk videos

No Smalltalk videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

D (Programming Language) videos

+ Add

D Language Tutorial

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Smalltalk and D (Programming Language))

Smalltalk

D (Programming Language)

Programming Language
35 35%
Programming Language
65% 65
OOP
35 35%
OOP
65% 65
Generic Programming Language
35 35%
Generic Programming Language
65% 65
Development
27 27%
Development
73% 73

User comments

Share your experience with using Smalltalk and D (Programming Language). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, D (Programming Language) should be more popular than Smalltalk. It has been mentiond 60 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Smalltalk mentions (28)

View more

D (Programming Language) mentions (60)

  • Ask HN: What is your (AI) dev tech stack / workflow? (June 2026)
    I've spent 2 weeks (2-4h per day) to make D language[1] version of Sciter SDK [2] Choice of AI "tooling" was by accident - typed something like "how to define copy constructor in D for custom structure" in Microsoft's Copilot in Edge browser that gives context for AI. The answer was good enough for me and so I went with it further. [1] D language HQ : https://dlang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Rue: Higher level than Rust, lower level than Go
    > Mostly, I am not really trying to compete with C/C++/Rust on speed, but I'm not going to add a GC either. So I'm somewhere in there. Out of curiosity, how would you compare the goals of Rue with something like D[0] or one of the ML-based languages such as OCaml[1]? 0 - https://dlang.org/ 1 - https://ocaml.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Pony: An actor-model, capabilities-secure, high-performance programming language
    The D language home page has something similar with a drop down with code examples https://dlang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Show HN: D++lang โ€“ A new systems programming language with Python-like syntax
    What is this? There's a lot of red flags here. * The name "D" for a programming language was taken in 1999: https://dlang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Koto Programming Language
    >For me the biggest gap in programming languages is a rust like language with a garbage collector, instead of a borrow checker. I cannot agree more that's the much needed sweet spot/Goldilock/etc. Personally I have been advocating this approach for some times. Apparently the language is already widely available and currently has stable and wide compiler support including the venerable GNU compiler suite (GDC). It... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Smalltalk and D (Programming Language), you can also consider the following products

Pharo - Pharo is a pure object-oriented programming language and a powerful environment, focused on...

C++ - Has imperative, object-oriented and generic programming features, while also providing the facilities for low level memory manipulation

Nim (programming language) - The Nim programming language is a concise, fast programming language that compiles to C, C++ and JavaScript.

F# - F# is a mature, open source, cross-platform, functional-first programming language.

V (programming language) - Simple, fast, safe, compiled language for developing maintainable software.

Perl - Highly capable, feature-rich programming language with over 26 years of development

Loading...