
Sizzy
Polypane
Responsively
Browsershots
Sauce Labs
browserling
CrossBrowserTesting
Litmus
Clearbit
Apollo.io
Lusha
DiscoverOrg
Hunter.io
ZoomInfo
UpLead
Lead411
ClearbitSizzy might be a bit more popular than Clearbit. We know about 19 links to it since March 2021 and only 18 links to Clearbit. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Seems quite similar to https://sizzy.co/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Just so you know Sizzy exists as well and has been around for a while so you would competing with them as well. Source: over 2 years ago
I would like to introduce you to Sizzy. Source: over 3 years ago
Sizzy is the only exception I've found to date, but while being a nice for development it's not useful as an everyday browser. Source: over 3 years ago
I am personally debating on buying this eventually https://sizzy.co. Right now I use the built in Safari tool for testing on multiple iOS devices, but this will allow me to test on multiple device types. Source: over 3 years ago
Some display names need a lookup table, not fuzzy strings. Pairs like Investing.com / Fusion Media Limited or Lyrie.ai / OTT Cybersecurity Inc. Share almost no tokens, so WRatio stays low and that's correct behavior. For irreconcilable aliases like that you still want GLEIF, Clearbit, or simply a maintained slug → legal_name map. Fuzzy matching handles stylistic drift on the same name; it can’t handle unrelated... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Personal email domains destroy this. Clearbit's Enrichment API returns a null company when it hits gmail.com. Apollo routes personal domains straight to a consumer bucket and skips B2B fields entirely. Even PDL's /person/enrich endpoint — the most permissive of the major providers — gives you around 32% hit rate on Gmail addresses versus 74% on corporate domains. I measured this across 6,200 signups for a... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
A few things worth flagging: PDL beats Clearbit's historical rates for US and Western European companies, but drops to ~52% match rate for Japan and South Korea specifically. Apollo underperforms on raw company matching but returns significantly more contacts per domain in Prospector-style queries than Clearbit's Prospector ever did — the tradeoff is more stale titles in the result set. Hunter.io is fast and cheap... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Match rate of 38% in my test, but the data quality on what it does match is solid: title, seniority, industry, company size all returned cleanly. If you're already in HubSpot and enriching form fills in-place, Clearbit/Breeze is probably your lowest-friction option even at lower match rates. If you're not in HubSpot, there's no reason to choose it over PDL or Prospeo. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
One thing comparison guides consistently get wrong: Clay is not an enrichment API. It's a waterfall orchestration tool that calls People Data Labs, Apollo, Clearbit, and others in sequence for you. It's useful, but it adds 2–8 seconds of latency per row in my runs and costs more per match than going direct. For a CRM webhook flow where you need sub-second enrichment calls, Clay is the wrong layer to hit first. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Polypane - The browser for ambitious web developers that want to 5× their quality and efficiency.
Apollo.io - Apollo’s predictive prospecting, sales engagement, and actionable analytics help the teams to reach its full revenue potential.
Responsively - Develop responsive web-apps 5x faster!
Lusha - Search less. Sell more.
Browsershots - Browsershots makes screenshots of your web design in different browsers.
DiscoverOrg - DiscoverOrg is an IT sales intelligence platform providing technology marketers access to data, IT org charts, and real time projects.