Simply Static VS Lego Static Site Generator

Compare Simply Static VS Lego Static Site Generator and see what are their differences

Zarla

Zarla: The AI Website Builder for Local Businesses featured

Contents:

Never worry about WordPress hacks again.

Fast Static Site Generator that generates optimised, performant websites.

Security
Since Simply Static generates static HTML files, there are significantly fewer vulnerabilities compared to dynamic websites that rely on databases and server-side scripts.
Performance
Static sites load faster because they serve pre-generated HTML files directly from the server, minimizing processing time and server load.
Cost-Effective
With fewer server-side resources required, hosting static sites tends to be more affordable compared to dynamic sites.
Scalability
Static sites can easily handle high traffic volumes since they don’t require database queries or dynamic content generation for each request.
Simplified Backup
Backing up a static site is straightforward as it involves simply copying the HTML, CSS, and asset files.

Lack of Dynamic Content
Static sites cannot change or load new content dynamically without regenerating the static files, which can limit functionality for interactive elements.
Time-Consuming Updates
Updating content can be cumbersome, requiring a full regeneration of the site to reflect content changes.
Limited Plugin Support
Many WordPress plugins, particularly those relying on backend processing, are not compatible with static site setups.
SEO Management Challenges
Static sites might need extra effort to manage SEO elements dynamically, especially for large websites with frequent content changes.
Complex Integration
Integrating third-party services or APIs might require additional setups or modifications since traditional methods expecting server-side processing may not work.