Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

WP2Static VS Simply Static

Compare WP2Static VS Simply Static and see what are their differences

WP2Static logo WP2Static

Static site generator for WordPress

Simply Static logo Simply Static

Never worry about WordPress hacks again.
  • WP2Static Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-23
  • Simply Static Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-02

WP2Static features and specs

  • Performance
    By converting a dynamic WordPress site into a static one, WP2Static eliminates the need to query the database or execute PHP code, resulting in faster page load times.
  • Security
    Static sites have a reduced attack surface as they do not rely on server-side code execution. This significantly decreases the risk of vulnerabilities such as SQL injection and other attacks common to dynamic sites.
  • Scalability
    Static sites can handle a large volume of traffic without additional infrastructure because they serve pre-rendered files, greatly reducing the demand on the server.
  • Cost Reduction
    Without the need for a high-performance server or a database, hosting static sites can be much cheaper compared to dynamic sites.
  • Ease of Deployment
    Static files can be easily deployed to any web hosting platform, CDN, or file storage service, making it flexible in terms of hosting options.

Possible disadvantages of WP2Static

  • Limited Interactivity
    Static sites lack dynamic features such as user authentication and content management, which are inherent to WordPress by default.
  • Complex Updates
    Updating content on a static site requires regenerating and redeploying the static files, which is less straightforward compared to updating a dynamic WordPress site.
  • Plugin Compatibility
    Some WordPress plugins rely on dynamic content generation or server-side execution, which may not work as expected with static site generators.
  • Learning Curve
    Users may need to adapt to a different workflow for deploying updates and managing their site, especially if they are accustomed to a traditional WordPress setup.
  • SEO Concerns
    Certain SEO features, like dynamic XML sitemaps or real-time meta tags updates, require special handling or additional tools to implement in static sites.

Simply Static features and specs

  • Security
    Since Simply Static generates static HTML files, there are significantly fewer vulnerabilities compared to dynamic websites that rely on databases and server-side scripts.
  • Performance
    Static sites load faster because they serve pre-generated HTML files directly from the server, minimizing processing time and server load.
  • Cost-Effective
    With fewer server-side resources required, hosting static sites tends to be more affordable compared to dynamic sites.
  • Scalability
    Static sites can easily handle high traffic volumes since they don’t require database queries or dynamic content generation for each request.
  • Simplified Backup
    Backing up a static site is straightforward as it involves simply copying the HTML, CSS, and asset files.

Possible disadvantages of Simply Static

  • Lack of Dynamic Content
    Static sites cannot change or load new content dynamically without regenerating the static files, which can limit functionality for interactive elements.
  • Time-Consuming Updates
    Updating content can be cumbersome, requiring a full regeneration of the site to reflect content changes.
  • Limited Plugin Support
    Many WordPress plugins, particularly those relying on backend processing, are not compatible with static site setups.
  • SEO Management Challenges
    Static sites might need extra effort to manage SEO elements dynamically, especially for large websites with frequent content changes.
  • Complex Integration
    Integrating third-party services or APIs might require additional setups or modifications since traditional methods expecting server-side processing may not work.

WP2Static videos

Simply Static Vs WP2Static - Creating Static Sites with Wordpress

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to create a Static version of your Wordpress Website (DEPRECATED) PLEASE USE wp2static

Simply Static videos

Simply Static Vs WP2Static - Creating Static Sites with Wordpress

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to Convert a WordPress site into Static HTML using Simply Static WordPress Plugin

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WP2Static and Simply Static)
Blogging
61 61%
39% 39
CMS
57 57%
43% 43
Blogging Platform
58 58%
42% 42
Static Site Generators
56 56%
44% 44

User comments

Share your experience with using WP2Static and Simply Static. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, WP2Static seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

WP2Static mentions (12)

  • WordPress plugin hole puts '2M websites' at risk
    > It is not actually that hard to run Wordpress securely. Stick to supported plugins and themes, and install security patches quickly when they are released. Depending on your site's functionality, it may also be possible to run a static WP site: * https://wordpress.org/plugins/simply-static/ * https://wp2static.com You do all your regular updates via the CMS, but, instead of putting the dynamic site on the... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Wordpress.org website creation and hosting
    The closest "free" option I can think of is Oracle Cloud, but /r/oraclecloud shows plenty of horror stories in registration and maintaining an instance. If you don't actually need interactive features, WP2Static on your local instance to be deployed to Cloudflare Pages might work. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Wp-SQLite: WordPress running on an SQLite database
    > Most WP sites should be static sites. https://wordpress.org/plugins/simply-static/ https://wp2static.com. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • WordPress sites getting hacked ‘within seconds’ of TLS certificates being issued
    Depending on the site, ask yourself "How dynamic does it actually have to be?". Perhaps using the GUI to update the content, and then creating static files and serving those may be an option: * https://wp2static.com. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • Building a blog from scratch in 2022 using Hugo, Docker and a bit of Python
    What is wrong with using Wordpress? I believe now one can get Wordpress to have 'static site' capabilities these days [0] [0] https://wp2static.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
View more

Simply Static mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Simply Static yet. Tracking of Simply Static recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WP2Static and Simply Static, you can also consider the following products

Staatic - Staatic is a platform to create an extremely fast and highly secure static version of your WordPress site without effort.

GatsbyJS - Blazing-fast static site generator for React

Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.

Pelican - A static site generator, written in Python, that requires no database or server-side logic

Grav - The modern open source flat-file CMS

CrocoBlock - Advanced plugins for Elementor and Gutenberg