Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Sim Daltonism VS react-testing-library

Compare Sim Daltonism VS react-testing-library and see what are their differences

Sim Daltonism logo Sim Daltonism

From the perspective of a color blind person, some colors are impossible to distinguish.

react-testing-library logo react-testing-library

[`React Testing Library`][gh] builds on top of `DOM Testing Library` by adding
  • Sim Daltonism Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-30
  • react-testing-library Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-21

Sim Daltonism features and specs

  • Accessibility Awareness
    Sim Daltonism helps users understand how colorblind individuals see by simulating different types of color blindness, increasing awareness and fostering inclusivity.
  • Real-time Simulation
    The application provides real-time simulation, making it easier for designers to see how their work looks to colorblind users instantly.
  • Free to Use
    Sim Daltonism is available for free, making it accessible to a wide range of users who need to consider colorblind accessibility in their work.
  • Multiple Types of Color Blindness
    The tool supports various types of color blindness, including protanopia, deuteranopia, and tritanopia, allowing users to test their designs against multiple scenarios.
  • Easy to Use
    The software is user-friendly and simple to set up, requiring minimal technical knowledge to start using effectively.

Possible disadvantages of Sim Daltonism

  • MacOS Only
    Sim Daltonism is only available on MacOS, limiting its accessibility to users on other operating systems such as Windows and Linux.
  • Limited to Screen Content
    The app only simulates colors on the screen, which can be a limitation for testing printed materials or non-digital designs.
  • Dependency on Screen Calibration
    The accuracy of the simulation can be affected by screen calibration, potentially leading to inconsistent results across different devices.
  • Lack of Integration
    Sim Daltonism does not integrate directly with design software, requiring users to run simulations as a separate process which can interrupt workflow.
  • No Prototyping Features
    Unlike some other accessibility tools, it doesn't offer additional prototyping or testing features beyond color vision simulation.

react-testing-library features and specs

  • Focused on user-centric testing
    React Testing Library encourages tests that closely resemble how users interact with an application. This approach makes tests more reliable and meaningful.
  • Reduces coupling to implementation details
    By encouraging developers to interact with components via the DOM, the library minimizes dependencies on component internals, making tests less prone to breaking from refactors.
  • Improved test readability
    Tests written with React Testing Library are generally easier to read and understand because they focus on what the user sees and does, rather than the internal logic of the components.
  • Comprehensive query options
    The library provides a wide range of query methods (e.g., getByText, getByRole), which makes it easy to select elements in ways that resemble how users think.
  • Active community and well-maintained
    React Testing Library has a strong, active community and it's maintained by experienced developers who keep the library up-to-date with React's evolution.

Possible disadvantages of react-testing-library

  • Limited support for non-DOM testing
    The library is heavily focused on DOM interactions, making it less suited for testing non-DOM logic or scenarios that don't involve user interactions.
  • Can be slower
    Tests that involve the DOM can be slower compared to tests that interact directly with component methods and state, which can lead to longer test execution times.
  • Learning curve for traditional testers
    Developers who are used to testing implementation details with other tools (like Enzyme) might find it challenging to adjust to the user-centric approach advocated by React Testing Library.
  • Potential for less granular control
    Because the library encourages testing through the UI, developers might find it harder to test specific, isolated internal behaviors of components that aren't directly visible to users.
  • Dependencies on browser APIs
    The library's reliance on browser APIs means that tests may behave differently in different environments or may require polyfills for certain features, leading to potential inconsistencies.

Analysis of react-testing-library

Overall verdict

  • React Testing Library is highly regarded in the React community for its simplicity and effective approach to testing React components. Itโ€™s known for promoting good testing practices that result in reliable and maintainable code.

Why this product is good

  • React Testing Library is considered good because it encourages testing practices that closely resemble how users interact with the application. It emphasizes testing components from the user's perspective and discourages testing implementation details, which can lead to more robust and maintainable tests.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking to improve the reliability of their React applications
  • Teams interested in adopting user-centric testing methodologies
  • Projects that prioritize maintainable and understandable test code

Sim Daltonism videos

No Sim Daltonism videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

react-testing-library videos

React unit testing with Jest & React-testing-library

More videos:

  • Review - Test a React Component that renders a list with react-testing-library

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Sim Daltonism and react-testing-library)
Developer Tools
15 15%
85% 85
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
Color Palette Generator
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Sim Daltonism and react-testing-library. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, react-testing-library seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 135 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Sim Daltonism mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Sim Daltonism yet. Tracking of Sim Daltonism recommendations started around Mar 2021.

react-testing-library mentions (135)

  • ๐Ÿš€ 9 Libraries to Boost Your Productivity as a React Developer
    React Testing Library (RTL) provides lightweight utilities built on top of react-dom and react-dom/test-utils, designed to promote testing through user interactions rather than component internals. Instead of working with component instances, RTL encourages querying and asserting against actual DOM nodes, just like real users would. This approach improves test reliability and pushes developers toward writing more... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Best Practices for React Applications
    Testing ensures code reliability and maintainability. Jest, Vitest and React Testing Library are standard tools for unit and integration testing. Unit tests verify individual components, while integration tests ensure features work together. For example, testing a TodoList component might involve:. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Migrating from AngularJS to React
    Additionally, I wrote Jest and Enzyme unit tests to demonstrate how to go about unit testing the components, as test driven development (TDD) is another methodology my organization subscribes to. Jest is a unit testing framework that actually shipped with React if you use the Create React App CLI to make a new React project. And at the time, Enzyme was created by Airbnb and added additional functionality to Jest... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • How To Convert HTML CSS JS To React JS
    After converting your components, take some time to test your application. Make sure everything is working as expected. Reactโ€™s development server automatically reloads your application whenever you save changes, which makes testing a lot easier. Tools like Jest and React Testing Library are also available to help you write tests for your components. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • How To Write Unit Test Cases In React JS
    React Testing Library: For testing React components from a userโ€™s point of view, visit the React Testing Library documentation. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Sim Daltonism and react-testing-library, you can also consider the following products

Coblis - If you are not suffering from a color vision deficiency it is very hard to imagine how it looks...

Storybook - Storybook is an open source tool for developing UI components in isolation for React, Vue, and Angular. It makes building stunning UIs organized and efficient.

Colorblind Web Page Filter - Enter a URL, and this tool will render it as someone with color blindness will see it.

Jest - Jest is a delightful JavaScript Testing Framework with a focus on simplicity.

Colour Blindness Simulator - Use our Colour Blindness Simulator to reveal how your images may appear to users with a variety of...

Vitest - A blazing fast unit test framework powered by Vite