Shlink VS cppq

• Self-Hosted
  Shlink is a self-hosted URL shortener, providing full control over your data. You can deploy it on your own server and manage the privacy and security of your shortened links.
• Custom Domains
  Shlink supports the use of custom domains for shortened URLs, allowing you to maintain consistent branding and a professional appearance.
• Detailed Analytics
  Shlink offers comprehensive analytics, including geographic breakdowns, referrers, and device types, allowing you to gain valuable insights into your link traffic.
• REST API
  Shlink comes with a powerful REST API, enabling developers to integrate URL shortening functionality into their own applications with ease.
• Open Source
  As an open-source project, Shlink invites community contributions and code audits, ensuring the software continues to improve and remain secure.
• QR Code Generation
  Shlink can automatically generate QR codes for each shortened URL, providing an easy way to share links in physical media.
• Webhooks
  Shlink supports webhooks, allowing for real-time notifications and triggering of actions when certain events, such as link clicks, occur.

Possible disadvantages

• Setup Complexity
  Setting up Shlink requires some technical knowledge, including server management and configuration, which might be a barrier for users without technical expertise.
• Maintenance
  As a self-hosted solution, Shlink requires regular maintenance and updates to ensure security and performance, which can be time-consuming.
• Resource Intensive
  Running Shlink on your own server can consume significant resources, especially with high traffic volumes, necessitating a robust hosting environment.
• Lack of Premium Support
  Being an open-source project, Shlink does not offer official, dedicated premium support, which might be a drawback for businesses needing immediate assistance.
• Learning Curve
  The extensive feature set and customization options of Shlink come with a learning curve, requiring time and effort to master all functionalities.

• Lightweight C++ implementation
  cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
• Redis-backed reliability
  Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
• Inspired by proven design (asynq)
  The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
• Native integration for C++ projects
  For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
• Open source and inspectable
  Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited maturity and battle-testing
  Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
• Smaller community and ecosystem
  Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
• Documentation gaps
  As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
• C++ build and dependency complexity
  Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
• Fewer built-in features and tooling
  cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

2020 Wine Reviews: Shlink Haus Wines

No cppq videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• How I Built a Scalable, Free URL Shortener.

  Building a URL shortener from scratch? Nah, you’re crazy! Instead, we grabbed a trusty open-source solution that’s already been battle-tested. By using this ready-made tool, we skipped the drama of starting from zero and cut our... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

• Show HN: An open-source alternative to Bitly

  Last big project at my old job was for an appointment notification service. In addition to making messages longer and thus costing us more, counterintuitively the unshortened URLs got flagged as spam by automated systems and end users... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

• Copying microsofts aka.ms links with our internal Dns to help stop phishing

  IF you just want to setup an internal link shortener, there is software out there for it. We do it at my company. The best one I've found is Shlink: https://shlink.io/. Source: over 3 years ago

View more

Tracking cppq since Nov 2022.