Software Alternatives & Startups

Shields.io VS Commit Together by Github

Compare Shields.io VS Commit Together by Github and see what are their differences

Shields.io

GitHub badges as a service

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Commit Together by Github

Now add co-authors to your commits

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Shields.io seems to be a lot more popular than Commit Together by Github. While we know about 80 links to Shields.io, we've tracked only 1 mention of Commit Together by Github.

social mentions
80 vs 1
API Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
96 vs 73

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Shields.io
Commit Together by Github
Website shields.io github.blog
Pricing
Open source
—
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Shields.io 5 features
Commit Together by Github 4 features
  • Customization
    Shields.io provides a wide range of customization options for badges, allowing users to personalize colors, styles, and formats to suit their needs or match their branding.
  • Wide Range of Services Supported
    Shields.io offers support for numerous services and provides badges for a variety of data points, facilitating easy integration with tools like GitHub, Travis CI, and many others.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, users can contribute to the development and improvement of Shields.io or even host their own badge server if needed.
  • Free to Use
    Shields.io is freely available, making it accessible for individual developers and teams without any associated cost.
  • Ease of Use
    The service is user-friendly, with straightforward URL-based APIs, enabling easy generation and implementation of badges.

Possible disadvantages

  • Performance Impact
    Embedding many badges from Shields.io can potentially slow page load times, as each badge results in an additional HTTP request.
  • Dependency on External Service
    Relying on Shields.io adds an external dependency, which could be a concern if the service experiences downtime or issues.
  • Limited Control Over Availability
    Being a hosted service, users have limited control over the availability and uptime, compared to self-hosted solutions.
  • Design Limitations
    While Shields.io offers a good range of customization options, it may not cover all possible design preferences or organizational branding needs.
  • Enhanced Collaboration
    Commit Together allows multiple authors to be credited in a single commit, which fosters a more collaborative environment and ensures everyone involved receives recognition for their contributions.
  • Improved Code Review Process
    With multiple authors clearly listed, reviewers can better understand who contributed to which parts of the code, facilitating more directed questions and discussions.
  • Accountability
    By attributing every change to the respective author, teams can easily track who made specific changes, which helps in accountability and understanding the history of a project.
  • Efficiency in Pair Programming
    When pair programming, both developers can be credited for their combined effort, streamlining the process of sharing code ownership during collaborative sessions.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Commit History
    Having multiple authors for a single commit may lead to a more complex commit history, making it harder to pinpoint individual contributions over time.
  • Potential Workflow Conflicts
    Teams that are used to single-author commits may experience workflow conflicts or require adjustments in practices to accommodate multi-author contributions.
  • Initial Setup Overhead
    Learners and new users might face a learning curve or require additional setup to understand and correctly implement the multi-author commit feature.
  • Tooling Compatibility
    Some third-party tools and extensions might not fully support or display multi-author commits, leading to inconsistencies in those environments.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Shields.io
Commit Together by Github
100% 100%
0% 0%
60% 60%
40% 40%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Shields.io and Commit Together by Github. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Shields.io 80 mentions
Commit Together by Github 1 mention
  • How to Download a GitHub README as PDF (Badges, Tables and Mermaid Included)
    Badge images. Lines like ![Build](https://img.shields.io/github/actions/workflow/status/...) fetch images from shields.io and similar external URLs. Server-side converters often block external requests; browser-based tools load them... - Source: dev.to / 29 days ago
  • How to Write a Good README: Your Project's Most Important File [2026 Guide]
    Badges. Those little colored shields at the top of a README — build passing, coverage percentage, npm version, license type — aren't decoration. According to shields.io, which powers most of them, badges provide live, at-a-glance... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • How I Made My First GitHub Action Work (With Google's Help)
    Shield.io Badges - Add those cool status badges to your README. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

View more

  • Ask HN: Do you rewrite pull requests?
    There is "Co-authored-by" which is supported on GitHub [1] and seems appropriate if the maintainer is basing the solution on someone's code. [1] https://github.blog/2018-01-29-commit-together-with-co-authors/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

Alternatives to Shields.io and Commit Together by Github

When comparing Shields.io and Commit Together by Github, you can also consider the following products.