ShellNewHandler VS Uiprobe

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, ShellNewHandler seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions: 2 vs 0
File Sharing popularity: 100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

	ShellNewHandler	Uiprobe
Website	sourceforge.net	uiprobe.io
Pricing	—	Freemium Free trial $39 / Monthly Official pricing
Platforms	—	Web Google Chrome Figma
Company	—	Startup from The Netherlands · 1 - 9 employees · 2026
Listed in	Cloud Storage Monitoring Tools File Sharing Website Monitoring +1	QA Tools Developer Tools QA Testing Design Tools +2

About ShellNewHandler and Uiprobe

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

ShellNewHandler

Uiprobe

No description of ShellNewHandler yet.

Most teams still check design implementation by eye. Flicking between Figma and the browser, taking screenshots, leaving comments. It is an annoying, draining time sink that pulls focus from real work. We built Uiprobe to take that off your plate. You give us a Figma frame and a live URL, and we...

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

ShellNewHandler 0 features

Uiprobe 5 features

No features have been listed yet.

Figma to live page
Figma frame compared against a live URL by reading computed CSS, not image overlays.
Deterministic comparison
Same probe run twice returns the same findings. No AI in the detection path.
Structured findings
Differences organized into Properties, Spacing, and Unverified, each with expected and actual values.
Spacing measurements
Layout and gap differences shown with on-canvas distance lines and delta labels.
Version comparison
Re-run after a fix to see the delta against the previous run.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

ShellNewHandler

Uiprobe

Overall verdict

ShellNewHandler is a niche, lightweight utility hosted on SourceForge designed to give users more control over the Windows 'New' context menu (the ShellNew menu). It can be considered good for its specific narrow use case, but it is an older, minimally maintained tool that may not suit all users, especially those on modern Windows versions.

Why this product is good

Provides direct control over customizing the Windows right-click 'New' menu, allowing users to add or remove file type entries
Lightweight and free, without bundled bloatware typical of some other free utilities
Simple and focused in scope, making it easy to understand for its specific purpose
Open distribution via SourceForge allows transparency and no-cost access

Recommended for

Power users who want to declutter or customize the Windows New context menu
IT administrators managing standardized desktop environments across multiple machines
Users comfortable with older utility-style tools and Windows registry-related tweaks
Not recommended for casual users seeking modern, actively supported software with regular updates

Overall verdict

Uiprobe.io appears to be a niche UI/UX testing or monitoring tool, but there is limited independent, verifiable information available about it, so its overall quality cannot be confidently confirmed.

Why this product is good

May offer automated UI testing or probing capabilities useful for catching visual or functional regressions.
Could integrate into CI/CD pipelines for streamlined testing workflows.
Potentially lightweight and easy to set up compared to more complex QA tools.
Lack of widespread reviews or public case studies makes it hard to verify long-term reliability and support quality.

Recommended for

Small to medium development teams looking for a simple UI testing solution.
Startups wanting an affordable alternative to enterprise-level testing suites.
Developers who need quick UI monitoring without extensive configuration.
Teams willing to try a lesser-known tool and evaluate it through a trial period before committing long-term.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100

ShellNewHandler

Uiprobe

100% 100%

0% 0%

100% 100%

0% 0%

100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing ShellNewHandler and Uiprobe.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Uiprobe's answer:

We render the live page with a browser engine and read its computed CSS, then run a deterministic comparison engine that maps elements between the Figma frame and the rendered page. Design input comes through the Figma API, with a Chrome extension and a Figma plugin as entry points.

What makes your product unique?

Uiprobe's answer:

We compare your Figma design against the live page deterministically, reading the rendered page's computed CSS rather than overlaying screenshots. Run the same probe twice and you get the same findings. The output is a structured list across three sections, Properties, Spacing, and Unverified, each with the exact expected and actual values, so you see the precise property that diverged instead of a fuzzy image diff.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Uiprobe's answer:

Reliability. We deliberately kept AI out of the detection path, because AI-based comparison gave different results between runs, and if you run the same comparison twice and get different answers, nothing else matters. Reading computed CSS instead of comparing images means a finding names the exact property and value that diverged. For teams shipping front-ends from Figma, that means less manual pixel-peeping and fewer back-and-forths in review.

What's the story behind your product?

Uiprobe's answer:

We kept hitting the same annoying, draining task while building front-ends: manually checking whether the live page reflected the Figma design. Switching tabs, taking screenshots, leaving comments. We tried AI comparison first, but the results shifted between runs and we could not trust them. So we rebuilt the comparison to be deterministic, reading computed CSS, and made the output a list of findings rather than a judgment. Uiprobe is the tool we wanted while doing that work.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Uiprobe's answer:

Frontend developers and UI designers who build from Figma and care that what ships reflects the design. That includes product teams and agencies, Webflow, Shopify, and custom front-end shops, who handle design QA by hand today. It increasingly includes developers using AI coding tools, who generate UI fast and need a reliable way to verify the output against the design.

User comments

Share your experience with using ShellNewHandler and Uiprobe. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

ShellNewHandler 2 mentions

Uiprobe 0 mentions

I recently got libreoffice, but now the new option in right click looks like a mess. Can someone help me get rid of them please?
Use Shell New Handler. Run the portable app and simply untick the items you don't want to appear in your new context menu. Source: about 4 years ago
This menu should be easy to add/remove programs to... Who is really creating Access Databases from this menu often enough to keep it here? (Not me!) Is there an easy way to edit this?
I've always used ShellNewHandler for this. It's a really simple portable utility that allows you to remove most of the items from that menu. Tested it out on Windows 11 and it's still compatible. Source: over 5 years ago

Tracking Uiprobe since Jun 2026.

Compare ShellNewHandler VS Uiprobe and see what are their differences

Base details

About ShellNewHandler and Uiprobe

Features and specs

Analysis

Category popularity

Questions & Answers

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

What makes your product unique?

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

What's the story behind your product?

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

User comments

Social recommendations and mentions