Most teams still check design implementation by eye. Flicking between Figma and the browser, taking screenshots, leaving comments. It is an annoying, draining time sink that pulls focus from real work.
We built Uiprobe to take that off your plate. You give us a Figma frame and a live URL, and we compare them by reading the computed CSS of the rendered page rather than overlaying images. We surface the exact differences in spacing, color, typography, and size as structured findings, each with its expected and actual values.
The comparison is deterministic. Run the same probe twice and you get the same findings. That reliability is the whole point: AI tools generate the code, and we verify the output against the design.
Findings are organized into three sections so you can scan what diverged and act on it:
Re-run a probe after a fix to see the delta against the previous version. Uiprobe runs as a web app, a Chrome extension, and a Figma plugin.
A startup from The Netherlands that is founded by Maarten Boon.
Figma to live page
Figma frame compared against a live URL by reading computed CSS, not image overlays.
Deterministic comparison
Same probe run twice returns the same findings. No AI in the detection path.
Structured findings
Differences organized into Properties, Spacing, and Unverified, each with expected and actual values.
Spacing measurements
Layout and gap differences shown with on-canvas distance lines and delta labels.
Version comparison
Re-run after a fix to see the delta against the previous run.
We render the live page with a browser engine and read its computed CSS, then run a deterministic comparison engine that maps elements between the Figma frame and the rendered page. Design input comes through the Figma API, with a Chrome extension and a Figma plugin as entry points.
We compare your Figma design against the live page deterministically, reading the rendered page's computed CSS rather than overlaying screenshots. Run the same probe twice and you get the same findings. The output is a structured list across three sections, Properties, Spacing, and Unverified, each with the exact expected and actual values, so you see the precise property that diverged instead of a fuzzy image diff.
Reliability. We deliberately kept AI out of the detection path, because AI-based comparison gave different results between runs, and if you run the same comparison twice and get different answers, nothing else matters. Reading computed CSS instead of comparing images means a finding names the exact property and value that diverged. For teams shipping front-ends from Figma, that means less manual pixel-peeping and fewer back-and-forths in review.
We kept hitting the same annoying, draining task while building front-ends: manually checking whether the live page reflected the Figma design. Switching tabs, taking screenshots, leaving comments. We tried AI comparison first, but the results shifted between runs and we could not trust them. So we rebuilt the comparison to be deterministic, reading computed CSS, and made the output a list of findings rather than a judgment. Uiprobe is the tool we wanted while doing that work.
Frontend developers and UI designers who build from Figma and care that what ships reflects the design. That includes product teams and agencies, Webflow, Shopify, and custom front-end shops, who handle design QA by hand today. It increasingly includes developers using AI coding tools, who generate UI fast and need a reliable way to verify the output against the design.
Uiprobe.io appears to be a niche UI/UX testing or monitoring tool, but there is limited independent, verifiable information available about it, so its overall quality cannot be confidently confirmed.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Uiprobe is good.
Check the traffic stats of Uiprobe on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Uiprobe on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Uiprobe's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Uiprobe on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Uiprobe on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Do you know an article comparing Uiprobe to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Uiprobe good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Uiprobe here. The primary details have been verified within the last quarter. So they could be considered up to date. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.