
SourceForge.net: ShellNewHandler details page

TinEye
Google Lens
SauceNAO
Yandex.Images
PimEyes
Bing Images
FrameTrace
Free reverse video search with its own index of adult video

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, ShellNewHandler seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | sourceforge.net | saucematch.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | — | 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of ShellNewHandler yet.
SauceMatch is a free reverse video search. You upload a frame, a picture, a GIF or a clip and it looks for the video the footage came from. It searches its own index of over 4 million videos, not Google or Bing. To be clear about the content, that index is adult video from tube sites, Reddit and...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of SauceMatch yet.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing ShellNewHandler and SauceMatch.
SauceMatch's answer:
Google Lens, Bing and TinEye look for pictures that were posted on web pages. A frame from the middle of a video was never posted anywhere, and most of these tools filter adult results anyway, so they usually find nothing. Many sites aimed at this niche either pass your picture to those same engines or show a grid of fake blurred "results" and charge to unblur them. SauceMatch is free, needs no account, and has no blurred results or unlock button. A Match has to be proven before it's shown. When nothing is found it tells you so, which means the video isn't in the index yet. Your browser picks the frames to search. On most computers only fingerprints of those frames are sent, not the video.
SauceMatch's answer:
SauceMatch is a reverse search originally built for video, not photos. You give it a screenshot, picture, GIF or clip, and it finds the full video the footage came from. It doesn't send your picture to Google or Bing. It searches its own index of over 46 million frames from about 5.2 million videos, posts and albums from adult tube sites, creator platforms and NSFW Reddit. A result only counts as a Match after keypoint geometry confirms that the two frames really line up. You get a 0 to 100 confidence score and the frame pairs side by side as proof. Weaker leads are listed separately as Similar and marked unverified. If the same video was uploaded to several sites, you get every copy, so one dead link isn't the end of it. There's also a face search for finding more videos of a performer. Saucematch avoids any SFW in its index for privacy reasons.
SauceMatch's answer:
SSCD, a copy-detection neural network, runs in PyTorch on the server and in ONNX Runtime Web (WebGPU or WebAssembly) in the browser. FAISS holds the nearest-neighbour index of frame fingerprints. A keypoint matcher built on OpenCV is compiled to WebAssembly so the Match check can run in the browser. The API is Python with FastAPI, with SQLite for the catalogue. WebCodecs and mp4box.js read clips in the browser. The site runs on Cloudflare Pages with Turnstile, and the face search uses separate face detection and recognition models.
SauceMatch's answer:
Two groups.
The first is people who come across a clip, GIF or screenshot with no title or link, on Reddit, X, Telegram or forums, and want the full video and every place it's posted. That includes people who answer "source?" requests in communities, since every Match comes with a link to the result they can post in the thread. All of them are adults (18+).
The second is the rights side: creators, performers, creator agencies and the copyright and takedown companies that work for them. Reposts of a creator's videos are hard to find by name or keyword, because reuploads get renamed. SauceMatch finds them by the frames themselves and shows every copy of a video it holds, which is what a takedown needs. Creators can already use the free repost check page and the removal form. Repost reports for agencies and takedown firms, and an API for bulk checks, are planned.
SauceMatch's answer:
It started with the comment that sits under almost every clip posted without context: "source?". Most of the time nobody answers it. I went looking for a tool that could, and found out why nobody does.
Google Lens filters adult results, and TinEye finds pictures posted on web pages, which a frame from a video never was. The sites built for this either forwarded my picture to the same engines or showed blurred results behind a $9.99 unlock. One of them handed my own upload back to me as a "match". So I built my own index from the preview frames that sites publish for their videos, plus a matcher that has to prove a match before it calls it one. It's a one-person project. It went live in September 2026, and the index grows every day.
SauceMatch's answer:
None yet. SauceMatch consumer-side is free, has no accounts and no paid plans. The business/company side as previously mentioned is still in the works, with multiple articles made about it from YTnews and AVN.
Share your experience with using ShellNewHandler and SauceMatch. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Use Shell New Handler. Run the portable app and simply untick the items you don't want to appear in your new context menu. Source: about 4 years ago
I've always used ShellNewHandler for this. It's a really simple portable utility that allows you to remove most of the items from that menu. Tested it out on Windows 11 and it's still compatible. Source: over 5 years ago
Tracking SauceMatch since Oct 2026.