Serverless
SST
CTO.ai
AWS Lambda
Webiny
Vercel
Google Cloud Platform
Up by apex
Amazon Elastic Transcoder
HandBrake
VideoLan
BombBomb
Renderforest
Rendi
Moovly
Reflector
Serverless Amazon Elastic TranscoderBased on our record, Serverless should be more popular than Amazon Elastic Transcoder. It has been mentiond 39 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
GP may have been referring to Serverless Framework (http://serverless.com//). - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
I deployed a lambda and http api gateway using a serverless.com (sls) template as a start. I get the following error when it processes a specific request:. Source: almost 3 years ago
Have you tried serverless.com ? It lets you have infrastructure as code. Source: over 3 years ago
- With Lambda, you manage creating and building the container yourself, as well as updating the Lambda function code. There are tools out there such as sst or serverless.com which help streamline this. Source: over 3 years ago
If you'd like to use Lambda, usually you need to engineer FOR it, from day one, you don't (often) get to choose some other framework and shoehorn it into Lambda and Serverless. There's some great frameworks to help deploy code into Lambda easily and create REST endpoints for things, one such frameworks is serverless.com that helps easily deploy to it, but it lacks a framework for doing REST that also supports... Source: over 3 years ago
That's certainly true to an extent. Other commenters have already highlighted necessary complexities. There is absolutely a lot of very entrenched "ways-of-working" that add unnecessary complexity, as with every domain. Not everything is a technical problem though and the social / process side of this sort of setup is what can make it work at all. The approach that you're hinting mostly describes the general... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Alternatively, if your Internet connection can handle it, you could upload your videos to a cloud service that processes them for you. For example, Amazon's AWS has a transcoding service called Elastic, which charges 3 cents per minute of video (half of that if it's lower than 720p). Might be worth the reduced time and effort for business use. Source: about 3 years ago
If you're looking for an AWS specific solution, check out Amazon Elastic Transcoder. I think it'll do what you want with a pipeline and you can do it serverless. Source: almost 4 years ago
If you use https://aws.amazon.com/elastictranscoder/ then you donโt need a computer, itโs a managed service, get your files to s3 somehow and thats it. There are some other services from other providers that can do the same too, I strongly encourage to look into that, unless you have specific encoding specs that you canโt do somewhere. Source: over 4 years ago
However compressing on the server is the better option in case you want to generate gifs, thumbnails, and different sizes and formats of the video. A lot of big video streaming companies will use something like Amazons media convert. Source: almost 5 years ago
SST - Work on your serverless apps live
HandBrake - HandBrake allows users to easily convert video files into a wide variety of different formats.
CTO.ai - Build, share & run developer workflows in the CLI + Slack
VideoLan - VLC: Official site - Free multimedia solutions for all OS!
AWS Lambda - Automatic, event-driven compute service
BombBomb - BombBomb allows companies to easily record and send video email from Gmail, mobile, or web.