Sendy VS D (Programming Language)

• Cost-effective
  Sendy provides a cost-effective solution for email marketing by allowing users to send emails via Amazon SES, which is significantly cheaper than other email marketing services.
• Self-hosted
  Since Sendy is a self-hosted application, users have full control over their data and server environment, providing better privacy and customizability.
• High Deliverability
  By leveraging Amazon SES, Sendy offers high deliverability rates, ensuring that emails land in recipients' inboxes rather than spam folders.
• One-time Payment
  Sendy requires a one-time payment for the license, making it a more affordable option in the long run compared to recurring subscription models.
• Rich Features
  Sendy includes many features such as campaign tracking, list segmentation, autoresponders, and integration with other applications, making it a comprehensive email marketing solution.

Possible disadvantages

• Technical Setup
  As a self-hosted application, setting up Sendy requires some technical knowledge and can be challenging for users who are not familiar with server management and configuration.
• Limited Integrations
  Unlike cloud-based email marketing services, Sendy offers fewer integrations with other third-party applications and services, which may limit its usability for some users.
• No Built-in Customer Support
  Sendy does not offer dedicated customer support; users must rely on the community forum and documentation for troubleshooting and assistance.
• Dependence on AWS
  Sendy specifically relies on Amazon SES for email delivery. If AWS services experience downtime or issues, Sendy's email delivery could be affected.
• Initial Cost
  While Sendy is generally cost-effective in the long term, the initial license purchase might be a barrier for individuals or small businesses with very limited budgets.

• Performance
  D is designed to be a high-performance systems programming language, offering performance comparable to C and C++ through native machine code compilation.
• Expressiveness
  D features a rich standard library and modern language constructs, such as garbage collection, first-class arrays, and advanced templating, making it easier to write expressive and maintainable code.
• Memory Safety
  D offers optional garbage collection along with manual memory management. This hybrid approach can help in developing safer applications by reducing memory-related errors.
• Interoperability
  D can easily interoperate with C API, enabling seamless integration with existing C libraries and systems. It also supports better C++ interoperability compared to other languages.
• Built-in Unit Testing
  D has built-in support for unit tests, allowing developers to write and run tests as part of the language itself, facilitating test-driven development.
• Concurrency
  D offers built-in concurrency support with message passing, similar to the actor model found in languages like Erlang, making it easier to write concurrent and parallel programs.

Possible disadvantages

• Adoption
  D is not as widely adopted as other languages like C, C++, or Java. This limited adoption means fewer libraries, frameworks, and community support.
• Toolchain Maturity
  While D's compilers and tools have improved over the years, they may still lack the maturity and feature set of more established languages, which can affect developer productivity.
• Learning Curve
  D's richness and combination of paradigms (such as imperative, object-oriented, and functional programming) can present a steep learning curve for new developers.
• Garbage Collection
  Although D offers optional garbage collection, its reliance on it for memory safety might be seen as a drawback for real-time system development where deterministic memory management is crucial.
• Ecosystem
  The ecosystem for D is less vibrant compared to more popular languages, leading to potentially fewer third-party libraries, tools, and resources.
• Standard Library Documentation
  The standard library documentation can be inconsistent or less comprehensive compared to other languages, making it difficult for developers to fully utilize all features of the language.

Email Marketing With Sendy - Review & Tutorial

More videos

D Language Tutorial

• Cheap Email Marketing Services: 6 Great Budget Tools Compared
  themeisle.com · Dec 2022

  💸 cheapest Sendy: For a one-time fee, you can install the Sendy software on your own server and then affordably deliver emails via Amazon SES.

• Any good Mailchimp alternatives?
  www.indiehackers.com · Mar 2021

  Separately, been keeping a list of Mailchimp alternatives. Sendfox works pretty well, and I plan to try out Sendy sometime soon.

• 7 Cheaper Mailchimp Alternatives to Consider in 2019
  www.codeinwp.com · Apr 2019

  Once you install Sendy on your own server, you’ll connect to Amazon SES to send the actual emails, which costs just $0.0001 per email (maybe an easier way to look at that is $1 per 10,000 emails). Plus, there’s no...

We have no reviews of D (Programming Language) yet. Be the first one to post

• Ask HN: Self hosted Waitlist with Landing page?

  "Preferably using shadcn/react/supabase. I don't want to reinvent the wheel here." Respectfully, you don't need supabase for a landing page with waitlist especially when you don't want to reinvest the wheel. You have several options: 1.... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• I tried the top email marketing tools

  What about https://sendy.co -- 1 million is about $100. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

• Ask HN: Cheap way to run a small newsletter?

  You can use https://listmonk.app or https://sendy.co and use a provider lke SES under the hood. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

View more

• Ask HN: What is your (AI) dev tech stack / workflow? (June 2026)

  I've spent 2 weeks (2-4h per day) to make D language[1] version of Sciter SDK [2] Choice of AI "tooling" was by accident - typed something like "how to define copy constructor in D for custom structure" in Microsoft's Copilot in Edge... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

• Rue: Higher level than Rust, lower level than Go

  > Mostly, I am not really trying to compete with C/C++/Rust on speed, but I'm not going to add a GC either. So I'm somewhere in there. Out of curiosity, how would you compare the goals of Rue with something like D[0] or one of the... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago

• Pony: An actor-model, capabilities-secure, high-performance programming language

  The D language home page has something similar with a drop down with code examples https://dlang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

View more