
Sejda
iLovePDF
Smallpdf
Adobe Acrobat DC
PDF24
PDF24 PDF Creator
CloudConvert
PDF24 - Online PDF Tools
Cppcheck
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
lgtm.com
SonarQube
VisualCodeGrepper
Flawfinder
Parasoft C/C++test
Sejda
CppcheckCppcheck is recommended for C/C++ developers and development teams, particularly those responsible for maintaining large codebases or projects where code quality and reliability are paramount. It is also beneficial for educational purposes, where students and new developers can learn about potential pitfalls in C/C++ programming.
Based on our record, Cppcheck should be more popular than Sejda. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
This is a week late, but through the FreeMediaHeckYeah sub, I was able to discover sejda.com , which is basically an (almost) all-in-one PDF editor website. Was neat to realize I didn't even have to download any software whatsoever. Source: over 3 years ago
Sejda.com - By far my most favorite experience but limits you to a # of docs per day. Source: almost 4 years ago
Might try sejda.com. Also as u/jakethepeg111 suggests, Libreoffice Draw could be an option. Source: almost 4 years ago
You need a Pdf file and then visit sejda.com. Source: almost 4 years ago
I use sejda.com for PDF editing. The best. Source: about 4 years ago
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 3 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: over 3 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: over 3 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 3 years ago
iLovePDF - Premium online PDF tool set
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
Smallpdf - PDF document management and conversion suite
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
Adobe Acrobat DC - Make your job easier with Adobe Acrobat DC, the trusted PDF creator. Use Acrobat to convert, edit and sign PDF files at your desk or on the go.
lgtm.com - lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.